Thread: Former Russian spy critically ill in Britain after exposure to unidentified substance

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Not because he suffered lasting medical problems from nerve agent contamination.

Of course not because being shunned socially is far worse than....

By 1992, when the interview was published, the nerve agent had gutted Zheleznyakov’s central nervous system. Less than a year later he was dead, after battling cirrhosis, toxic hepatitis, nerve damage and epilepsy.

SMH

Grow your own dope. Plant a pom.

A nerve agent that takes five years to kill it's victims. Very useful in a battlefield situation.

Originally Posted by Begbie

A nerve agent that takes five years to kill it's victims. Very useful in a battlefield situation.

He was only exposed because of a hood malfunction and received the antidote almost immediately.

The case of a Russian military scientist accidentally exposed to Novichok appears to show that even surviving the effects of the supertoxic nerve agent is horrific.
Andrei Zheleznyakov was said to have been injected with an antidote almost immediately, but a friend said he still went from being a jovial, creative man to suffering “chronic weakness, toxic hepatitis, epilepsy, severe depression and an inability to concentrate”, before dying five years later.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8253976.html

Andrei Zheleznyakov was said to have been injected with an antidote almost immediately, but a friend said he still went from being a jovial, creative man to suffering “chronic weakness, toxic hepatitis, epilepsy, severe depression and an inability to concentrate”, before dying five years later.

But nothing to indicate that the nerve agent was the cause of death.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

But nothing to indicate that the nerve agent was the cause of death.

"He died in 1993 of a brain seizure".

Any proof that the Russians did it yet?

Originally Posted by Neo

Any proof that the Russians did it yet?

Highly likely is the new proof for now..
Don't expect the proof finding committee to present a result "without any doubt" in the near future, they are all busy searching for Saddams weapon of mass destruction.

But you trust the russians eh?

Originally Posted by mcgoo

eh?

...solid Canadian riposte...

Originally Posted by mcgoo

But you trust the russians eh?

They are angels in heaven who can do no wrong as far as Neo and OhDoh are concerned.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Neo and OhDoh

...RT uber alles!...

......oops! Red for stepping on a sensitive RT nerve...

Thread: Former Russian spy critically ill in Britain after exposure to unidentified substance
an argument?

24-03-2018 07:27 AM
Klondyke

Originally Posted by mcgoo

But you trust the russians eh?

No, but that is quite irrelevant in this case.
Take action when there is proof, shutup when there only are unproven theories.

Originally Posted by lom

Take action when there is proof, shutup when there only is unproven theories.

...RT has openings for contributors...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...RT has openings for contributors...

Probably, but that is quite irrelevant in this case.

...^ah, I thought this was an audition thread...

Originally Posted by Neo

Russia wants closer economic and social ties to Europe, but sees the West and Nato repeatedly hostile toward Russian people and encroaching toward it's borders.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So he didn't invade Crimea then, he was just "wanting closer economic and social ties to Europe".

You little joker you.

Originally Posted by mcgoo

But you trust the russians eh?

The impartial OPCW, are looking at the UK supplied "evidence" as we speak. Very similar to the terrorist supplied "evidence" in Syria.

Which could equally dismissed as "contaminated", by the OPCW team or other interested parties.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So he didn't invade Crimea then, he was just "wanting closer economic and social ties to Europe".

You little joker you.

you really are just totally fucking stupid aren't you...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...RT has openings for contributors...

Any argument?

Originally Posted by Neo

From his perspective Russia is not the aggressor, Russia wants closer economic and social ties to Europe, but sees the West and Nato repeatedly hostile toward Russian people and encroaching toward it's borders.

This is not what 'arry wants to hear...

So he didn't invade Crimea then

No, he didn't. But you already know that. Of course, if you can show me some (photoshopped) pictures of invading armies, battlefield casualties etc I might stoop to take a second look- but until then, the crushing result of the Crimean Parliamentary Referendum is proof enough.

Meanwhile, ain't newly Coup installed democratic Ukraine doing well.

Originally Posted by OhOh

The impartial OPCW, are looking at the UK supplied "evidence" as we speak. Very similar to the terrorist supplied "evidence" in Syria.

Which could equally dismissed as "contaminated", by the OPCW team or other interested parties.

It wasn't going to be long before the whackjobs started trying to discredit the OPCW was it?