And if that's not bad enough Blue, today shopping at Tesco , at the exit where two pushy women collecting for a food bank . They expected me to give away some of my shopping to a food bank!
Has the taxi driver been interviewed by the Police in their criminal investigation yet? He needs to answer a lot of questions including why he only alerted one neighbor before clearing off.
Agree 100%Originally Posted by taxexile
Absolutely.Originally Posted by Troy
Surely that can't be true?Originally Posted by blue
Open and shut caseOriginally Posted by astasinim
the immigrants dodgy fridge situated by an open window caught fire
he went to see neighbour, left door propped open
draft sent flames outside igniting cladding, which maybe wasn't fitted very well etc
I wonder how the original concrete face was , in the 1970s they liked to use that congregated, deep grooved lines in it sometimes.
would act like a chimney if so.
Whats the rule with electricity you can see lights on in the building
Do they leave in on in a fire?
Newly-installed cladding is being scrutinised
Fire safety experts have pointed to cladding on the building as a possible reason the blaze spread so quickly.
Footage has shown the fire travelling up one side of the building, before engulfing the entire block.
New cladding was fitted as part of a £8.6m refurbishment of the tower, completed in May last year.
The cladding had a metal outer coating and an expanded foam interior. This polyethylene - or plastic - core is less fireproof than other alternatives.
However, even this type of cladding - when properly fitted and with its polyethylene insulation expertly encapsulated - should resist fire, the Fire Protection Association (FPA), the UK's national fire safety organisation, said.
Some exterior cladding can create cavities which, in some cases, can cause what's known as "a chimney effect", drawing flames up the cavity if there are no fire barriers.
London fire: A visual guide to what happened at Grenfell Tower - BBC NewsRay Bailey, managing director at Harley Facades Limited, which installed the cladding, said: "At this time, we are not aware of any link between the fire and the exterior cladding to the tower."
Rydon, the contractor responsible for the renovation of the tower, said its work "met all required building control, fire regulation, and health and safety standards".
It later issued a new statement, removing the previous mention of the building meeting fire regulation standards, instead saying the project met "all required building regulations".
My highest respects to her Majesty the Queen *edited* she truly looked visibly upset, teary eyed, as she consoled the residents the best she could.
Ditto for Prince William, his mum would be so proud.
The Queen visits Grenfell Tower fire victims as Prince William vows 'I'll be back' to distraught resident - Irish Mirror Online
Last edited by NZdick1983; 18-06-2017 at 07:55 AM.
Nicely summed up Blue, that's about the way of it. Why did the Fire dept pass that material as safe though with all the standards in health and safety the UK is meant to have?
^ My bad.. still half asleep...lazy Sunday..
Long live the Queen!
Tesco give all safe unsold food to charity.
https://www.tesco.com/community-food-connection/
The Above Post May Contain Strong Language, Flashing Lights, or Violent Scenes.
run down apartment blocks in mandalay are probably not plagued by feral british teenagers with nothing better to do than set off fire alarms and sprinklers and fire hoses just for the fun of it, vandalizing lifts and fire doors, stairwells and lighting units is all part of a days fun. something to do until the cider and pills arrive.This is why sprinklers and fire alarms are needed- inanimate objects tend not to panic. The block of flats I live in here in Mandalay is pretty run down- but it has working sprinklers, fire hoses and several exits. I fail to see how these would be an issue to be installed in a building in the developed world.
it only needs a couple of rogue families (e.g. mouthy single mum, five kids by five different absent fathers ) in a block to make the life of the decent families living there intolerable.
years ago, local "justice" would have sorted out such offenders, these days thats impossible. petty criminals are virtually untouchable.
its no wonder councils baulk at serious meaningful improvements to these blocks.
it is all too easy to blame "the government" for every problem that plagues society, but there are times a wider view should be taken.
Councils also seem to turn a blind eye to illegal sub letting and over crowding, that needs to be looked at as well. Having lived in social housing a couple of times the worst problem families were always white single mothers with a half breed brats, they always seemed to be in conflict with the housing office about something or other, wogs were rarely a problem.
The thing is Tax, your observations are based solely on your addled personal recollections of over 15 - 20 years ago, the Daily Mail and Telegraph leader pages, and an innate prejudice that runs through the DNA of all flat-capped, whippet hugging, clog hopping northern twats pontificating from their pulpit of self-righteous sanctimony.
From my more recent experiences these dwellings are quite well run, generally well managed and benefit from CCTV enforcement which in most cases enjoys the full support of the majority. Anti-social behaviour, criminality, drug dealing etc get short shrift and councils are pretty damn quick to boot out offenders. The stereotypical view you have just regurgitated is simply you airing prejudices and your catechism of bigotry, now mostly derived from fantasy.
and what and where exactly were these experiences, budleigh salterton ?From my more recent experiences these dwellings are quite well run,
Typical estate yob, Lily Allen would probably say he just needs a hug
I have had occasion to visit many such tower blocks in London in the course of my duties and through colleagues my knowledge of the zeitgeist is fairly current.
I know of what I speak - the worst places were laterally developed housing estates where territoriality is much more narrowly defined and as a consequence occupiers feel more empowered to enter into conflict to assert what they perceive as their occupation rights.
I bet your not a million miles away with your assumption Blue.
As mentioned before, maybe, if the wind was blowing the other direction, it would have been contained to the one flat.
Had it been winter, would the window have been open (if it ever was).
How old was the fridge? has it a history of bursting into flames.
There are so many considerations that need to be taken into account, and only then can you get to the cause.
Its just got to be risk assessed. Ideally, yes, it should be isolated, but then it creates another hazard which is visibility for crews working and residents evacuating. So long as a decision can be justified, then go for it.
I doubt the fire service were informed of the renovations. I`m not even sure that there is a legal obligation to notify for renovations (I`ll have to check that one).
Unfortunately, it takes tragedies like this, to get legislation changed. It took over 20 years for the fire service to get the legislation changed for new build houses (hard wired detectors must be fitted).
I aint superstitious, but I know when somethings wrong
I`ve been dragging my heels with a bitch called hope
Let the undercurrent drag me along.
While a bunch of repulsive animals on this thread shamefully try to blame immigrants for the conflagration the Chancellor of the Exchequer has confirmed that the cladding used on Grenfell Tower contained polyethylene and that its use was banned in the UK and the rest of Europe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)