Thread: London Attacked Again

full of kunts who are totally against the country

Not exactly a model of integration yourself, are you Xanax.

^ Now there's the answer we were looking for...

Begging your pardon (as I am ignorant),

What political party or candidate will (likely) benefit the most from this (and other recent) terrorist attacks in the U.K.?

Cheers

No words to say.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

As for Japan, well I suppose this doesn't count. Japan park explosions: Blasts kill one, injure three, in Utsunomiya | Daily Star Japan knife attack: At least 19 dead - CNN.com

Nope, just individual nut cases, they were not Muzzie terrorists...or affiliated with any extremist religious cult...

There have been such incidents in Japan, but not the ones you highlighted and no Muslim attacks as of yet....

Still.. complacency breeds vulnerability, so we should all remain vigilant.

When the Saxon begins to hate.

Originally Posted by NZdick1983

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

As for Japan, well I suppose this doesn't count. Japan park explosions: Blasts kill one, injure three, in Utsunomiya | Daily Star Japan knife attack: At least 19 dead - CNN.com

Nope, just individual nut cases, they were not Muzzie terrorists...or affiliated with any extremist religious cult...

There have been such incidents in Japan, but not the ones you highlighted and no Muslim attacks as of yet....

Still.. complacency breeds vulnerability, so we should all remain vigilant.

I seem to remember one religion gassing a load of people on the Tokyo metro with Sarin.

These are nutjobs, they aren't directed and they're extremely hard to defend against.

Lumping all muslims in with these people is as irrational as lumping all Christians in with the nutters that used to bomb abortion clinics.

^I really hope Dick will see this one day.

Not least because people need to see it as a first step towards a practicable solution. Or an amelioration, at least.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Thai3

No to sharia law at any level might be sensible

I think you'll find sharia law forbids random acts of murder.

Apart from beheading and stoning you mean? Killing the infidel and waging war on 'troublemakers' is not considered random, but jihad

'The wrath of the awakened Saxon'.

Sounds like some kind of mediaeval battle reenactment society - lonely Dungeons and Dragons fanatics putting on plastic armour on Sunday afternoon for the entertainment of primary school children. Having watched the video, he looks like the kind of guy who might have that in mind, too. Mind you, Anders Breivik looked like a pedo primary school caretaker, rather than a mass-murdering lunatic, so one can't be too sure.

Originally Posted by Slick

Originally Posted by Maanaam

The UK and Britain need to immediately get out of all Muslim countries and to seriously denounce and sanction Israel. Not just do it, but do it openly and apologising to all Muslims for all historical atrocities.

What?!

"Im sorry sir, please stop killing us"

Christ on a crutch dude thats the most soft-cock horseshit ive read in a while.

You're twisting it.
Muslims have suffered under the hands of Western empire-building, resource-stealing, and politics for generations. It's no wonder there's a group of them with vengeance in mind.
The sensible thing to do is to atone for past sins. Tell them what you're doing and make it up to them.
And yes, in a way parley for peace. It's very hard to win a war against unidentifiable guerrillas and the cycle will just continue. It's up to the West to break the cycle. You can't expect aggrieved Muslims to suddenly forgive the West, especially since the West is STILL interfering.

It's sheer arrogance to hit a guy, and when he hits you back be outraged and blame him for his aggression.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I seem to remember one religion gassing a load of people on the Tokyo metro with Sarin. These are nutjobs, they aren't directed and they're extremely hard to defend against. Lumping all muslims in with these people is as irrational as lumping all Christians in with the nutters that used to bomb abortion clinics.

Yep, that was the incident my wife told me was in any way remotely similar.

I was venting, I'm not lumping all Muslims together as evil... even I am not that stupid. Take what I said with a lump of rock salt.

Originally Posted by cyrille

^I really hope Dick will see this one day. Not least because people need to see it as a first step towards a practicable solution. Or an amelioration, at lea

^ What practical solution are you suggesting? (this late in the game)...

Vilifying all Muslims won't be a part of any practical solution. In fact it's what these people want. Surely you see that?

'Venting' just makes you look like another dimwit, tbh.

Solutions to this type of problem are never easy or palatable.

Let's have a go.
Agreeing in the main with the sentiments of Maanaam, however it would never be enough to have the West talk their way out of it.

A solution that would work may be as follows:

The western democracies make it clear that for every suicide bomber he/she will have 5 of his closest family executed.

I am not advocating, but it would be a solution.

Sigh...

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Originally Posted by Slick

Originally Posted by Maanaam

The UK and Britain need to immediately get out of all Muslim countries and to seriously denounce and sanction Israel. Not just do it, but do it openly and apologising to all Muslims for all historical atrocities.

What?!

"Im sorry sir, please stop killing us"

Christ on a crutch dude thats the most soft-cock horseshit ive read in a while.

You're twisting it.
Muslims have suffered under the hands of Western empire-building, resource-stealing, and politics for generations. It's no wonder there's a group of them with vengeance in mind.
The sensible thing to do is to atone for past sins. Tell them what you're doing and make it up to them.
And yes, in a way parley for peace. It's very hard to win a war against unidentifiable guerrillas and the cycle will just continue. It's up to the West to break the cycle. You can't expect aggrieved Muslims to suddenly forgive the West, especially since the West is STILL interfering.

It's sheer arrogance to hit a guy, and when he hits you back be outraged and blame him for his aggression.

Muslims were aggressive and over ran Christian counties for 300 years before the west did anything about it, Islam is inherently violent because Mohamad was and the Quran has 104 verses advocating violence. The bastard Prophet is quoted in the haddith of Bukari as saying 'I have been victorious by terror.' So give the poor oppressed Muslim excuse a rest, these fuckers have been at war with us forever no matter what we might have done to them. Without beating the fukers back at Tours, Lepanto and Vienna we would all be writing in Arabic, if we had not had our hand or heads cut off of course

Originally Posted by cyrille

Vilifying all Muslims won't be a part of any practical solution. In fact it's what these people want. Surely you see that? 'Venting' just makes you look like another dimwit, tbh.

Not vilifying all Muslims.. my bad if that was how I came across... just the radicalized cnuts that commit these atrocious acts.. just as sad to see the dead, broken children in Syria, Afghanistan, etc.. that we see on the news almost daily...

Cyrille is a spastic, he still cannot tell the difference between Muslims and ISLAM

Tommy, understandably emotional, some of our politicians should be as well



oh yeah before some spastic a hole says he is a racist or a bigot

Originally Posted by Iceman123

The western democracies make it clear that for every suicide bomber he/she will have 5 of his closest family executed.

Israel does collective punishment and it's unacceptable and it makes them despised not only by Muslims but many others around the world. All that would do is enrage and recruit countless more radicals.

We know the Q'uran does not really tell them to go out and kill the infidels and in fact really does advocate peace. It's the angry (and political) Imams twisting the "holy words". The solution lies in disarming those radicals of the ammunition WE give them, ie OUR provocations in the Middle East.
There's no need to go soft at home and pander to immigrants wishes, but in the homelands of Muslims DO go soft and make up for the decades of damage WE have done.

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Originally Posted by Iceman123

The western democracies make it clear that for every suicide bomber he/she will have 5 of his closest family executed.

Israel does collective punishment and it's unacceptable and it makes them despised not only by Muslims but many others around the world. All that would do is enrage and recruit countless more radicals.

We know the Q'uran does not really tell them to go out and kill the infidels and in fact really does advocate peace. It's the angry (and political) Imams twisting the "holy words". The solution lies in disarming those radicals of the ammunition WE give them, ie OUR provocations in the Middle East.
There's no need to go soft at home and pander to immigrants wishes, but in the homelands of Muslims DO go soft and make up for the decades of damage WE have done.

Liar the Quran does instruct the killing of unbelievers and hypocrites and those making trouble in Muslim lands, do you really need the stinking quotes all over again, are you really this stupid? The Quran only indicated peace in it's ealry suras, the law of abrogation makes those null and void by the latter, far more intolerant and violent ones. Seems Allah changed his mind when the fukers got the upper hand

^^^ If ISIS restricted themselves to murdering thick, incoherent, uninformed idiots like that, it wouldn't be much of an issue. They could murder away to their mad hearts' content and the rest of us could breath a quiet sigh of relief.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by NZdick1983

....you would need a weapon to confront an attacker with a knife,

Not true. It depends on the form of attack. Run, if you've got time or don't know how to handle the attacker's form. If cornered and you have no training in self defence skills against a knife attack,... you're fwkd.

Muay Thai can't defeat a knife...

True.

but a baseball bat can

Sometimes.

you can always strike then run (if you trust your quickness of foot)...

If you can hit him once where it counts, then repeat until the attacker stops moving.

Carrying a baseball bat might get you noticed if there are no jihadists performing in your vicinity. You usually need to get close enough to hit someone where it counts or anywhere else, and if they are armed and you're not you should ignore keyboard warriors and leg it.

Otherwise, with nowhere to run/hide, not that I expect true liberals to consider such a dishonest hack, especially given that jihad has nothing to do with Islam, my best advice is learn a few key Arabic/Koranic phrases which might just earn you a new lease on life if blurted loud enough in a close quarter attack.

Originally Posted by Scottish Gary

Reports coming in of a speeding van ramming into pedestrians on London Bridge and a knife attack at Borough Market.
Armed police attending both incidents.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

What's with the move to the thread with the stupid title? Fuck this. I'm just across the river from this watching the people being evacuated with their hands over their heads. Last post you'll get from me on this.

Sorry Bob did i steal your thunder

Originally Posted by Thai3

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Thai3

No to sharia law at any level might be sensible

I think you'll find sharia law forbids random acts of murder.

Apart from beheading and stoning you mean? Killing the infidel and waging war on 'troublemakers' is not considered random, but jihad

Keep digging, fucknuts. You'll find the bottom of that hole eventually.