China 'building runway in disputed South China Sea island'

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Rand McNally, an American publisher

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrG

.the guys name is Cui Jaiji

---

Let me say firstly. I am assuming that the maps as illustrated in the article are genuine. My local Thai library unfortunately only has the 2005 Beano Book of Brown Lands on it's shelf.

The person, allegedly, bringing this to our attention certainly has a Chines looking name. I will give you that. Whether he ever sat foot in China is not stated, whether he was born and raised/attended Ameristani schools/universities is not stated. Whether he is a red spy lurking at an Ameristani University all these years just to raise a point in a Chinese newspaper is not stated.

What is crystal clear that an Ameristani publisher of books throughout the world, has produced an atlas of the world which indicates, nothing stronger than that, that some of it's atlas buyers believe certain islands in the SCS have Chinese "connections". They are not the world authority.

One could presume either the publisher is sloppy and copied the first map he could find. Or one could assume the publisher, being an exceptional publisher, situated in an exceptional country, with exceptional access to the truth, checked the facts prior to publishing an Atlas.

Further in the article there are "claims" that this atlas has been "revised" over time 1992, 1994 and 1999. One assumes the exceptional publisher used the most "correct" geographical names and locations. Who defines the "correct" names and locations is probably not the Chinese government. More likely a government official closer to home who just happens to be exceptionally inaccurate but bends to any political wind that is blowing.

Many people only buy one atlas in their lifetime, many people use an atlas as a factual book and many libraries use the NON-FICTION area to place their atlases.

But please, don't let facts cast a shadow on your prejudices or the blaze of headlines through the MSM.

China conducts test flights on two new airports on Nansha Islands (7) - People's Daily Online

No problems the first of the many commercial flights have landed. Tourists will now be able to taste the fresh fish and seafood from the devastated islands, swim in the pristine sea and sample the delights of the hostesses and blue khaki clad soldierettes manning the AAC missile systems.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/469.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

No problems the first of the many commercial flights have landed. Tourists will now be able to taste the fresh fish and seafood from the devastated islands, swim in the pristine sea and sample the delights of the hostesses and blue khaki clad soldierettes manning the AAC missile systems.

---

You should be very proud.:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

China conducts test flights on two new airports on Nansha Islands (7) - People's Daily Online

No problems the first of the many commercial flights have landed. Tourists will now be able to taste the fresh fish and seafood from the devastated islands, swim in the pristine sea and sample the delights of the hostesses and blue khaki clad soldierettes manning the AAC missile systems.

---

When one of the CAAC (Chinese Airways, Always Crashing) nosedives into the pristine sea, they can blame on foreign military intervention.


Bonus.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrG

You should be very proud.

---

If it had been one of their own designed and built planes maybe, they missed another PR opportunity, as it is until the bars girls arrive it's no Koh Samui.

Look on the bright side, the more Chines holiday there means less in Thailand clogging up the "foreigners" immigration queues.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

China conducts test flights on two new airports on Nansha Islands (7) - People's Daily Online

No problems the first of the many commercial flights have landed. Tourists will now be able to taste the fresh fish and seafood from the devastated islands, swim in the pristine sea and sample the delights of the hostesses and blue khaki clad soldierettes manning the AAC missile systems.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/469.jpg

---

The cancer (Chinative) is spreading fast. :rolleyes:

(This cancer is spreading faster and is far more dangerous then any known diseases by mankind)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

I will continue to praise any political system which raises it's population out of poverty

---

And you think a nation rife with slave labour is doing this? You are fucking clueless. Continue to swallow your massive dose of propaganda.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

I will continue to praise any political system which raises it's population out of poverty. I will praise any countries leaders who advocate building things as opposed to blowing them up. I will continue to praise any country which allows in other countries companies and extract a premium for that honour. In many cases the companies sold their grandmothers for a slice, allegedly, of a dwindling pie. The Chinese on the other hand have eclipsed the post war Japanese move from copying trinkets to, in some fields world leaders, to become a global player -economically. They have shortened that cycle by 50% and raised a significant % of their own citizens from rural backwardness to world class employees.

---

Just because you like chinese food doesn't mean....:rolleyes:

You sound like one of those communist twats talking only about achievements and loosing reality. The Chinese Communist Party will surely pin another medal on your chest.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/477.jpg

^^ I suspect a lot of the very cheap stuff we buy from China has been made in Gulags.

Chinese cancer spreading from the mainland to the islands !

https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif

Quote:

---

China has been killing turtles, coral and giant clams in the South China Sea, tribunal finds

---

China has been killing turtles, coral and giant clams in the South China Sea, tribunal finds - LA Times

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Latindancer

^^ I suspect a lot of the very cheap stuff we buy from China has been made in Gulags.

---

They also make great organ donors.

Prisoners want to make up for the miss-achievement toward they beloved communist party, and are willing to donor without being forced of course.
Now thats what I call giving your heart and blood for your country. Made in China :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

ohoh may be a retarded brainwashed Chinese forum bot but even TD does have some minimum standards of decency required when slagging each other off.

---

Having worked in sales for too many years it runs of my back similar to water off a ducks.

Politeness can always be observed, even if one has to grit ones mental teeth. My family had standards, even if we ate too many egg and tomato sandwiches at tea time, in my opinion. Some may not have had such a privileged upbringing. For that reason I show tolerance to the underprivileged.

Quote:

---

China has been killing turtles, coral and giant clams in the South China Sea, tribunal finds

---

First China dams the Mekong, screwing up fishing in the delta (not to mention upstream) , now this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Baas Babelaas

we send in the 50 year old AIDS-ridden ladyboys to rip you apart, and cum on your face.

---

You are projecting your fantasies again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bsnub

And you think a nation rife with slave labour is doing this

---

Care to name a country where the "slave" labour is not rife and abused?

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/477.jpg

You do realise those medals are solid gold. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Latindancer

I suspect a lot of the very cheap stuff we buy from China has been made in Gulags

---

Maybe you need to raise your standards of what you swap your hard earned cash for. No demand, no profit, easy as that. Whilst people continue to buy crap somebody will produce it, make a profit and laugh at you, all the way to the gold shop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Chinese cancer spreading from the mainland to the islands !

---

Of course China has problems to solve, which country doesn't, care to list them all. At least China is improving it's infrastructure. Many countries with alleged "shovel ready jobs" don't seem so inclined. Improvements in China or increasing devastation in others. Take your pick as to which you prefer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

ow thats what I call giving your heart and blood for your country.

---

Nothing new in organ harvesting, some countries have been practising it for years. Some were told they were going to a holiday camp, some were prisoners of war, some chose that route for their next fix of heroin whilst others donated their sperm for "the goodness of the gene pool" and money for tuition fees. You are implying the Chinese donors have a choice. Say that to those who historically didn't.

This is some fucking Chines bot you have here or a simple non-educated Englishman.

I know, it hurts you either way doesn't it. :rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Latindancer

China has been killing turtles, coral and giant clams in the South China Sea, tribunal finds First China dams the Mekong, screwing up fishing in the delta (not to mention upstream) , now this.

---

Not as extreme as pulling babies from incubators though. Note they weren't baby turtles only the older ones ripe for Turtle soup, a delicacy worldwide otherwise why harvest them. Coral islands eh, maybe use a few to detonate an H-bomb or two on would be more environmentally acceptable. As for the giant clams, never had your foot stuck in one and running out of oxygen.

A tribunal, which has no authority in deciding a legal issue turns around and becomes an environmental judge. Isn't their another UN forum for that?

Damming rivers eh, must be a new idea or does the previous centuries of using dams for water or hydro power by other environmentally sensitive nations not apply. I wonder how much of the shit and trinkets the west demands to be supplied with uses the water and power in manufacturing. Again stop buying on price and buy on quality and environmental issues, it's up to you.

The answer is to build "civilian" nuclear power stations near the sea and let a few waves pollute an entire ocean. Now that's progress.:rolleyes:

Shooting fish in barrels is harder, keep them coming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Compare that result to Ameristan and Europe. Stagnation, depression, austerity, fraud, corruption, invasion, genocide, lies and bullying. You want it you can keep it.

---

And just where in the Chinese Paradise do you make your home.

My current "paradise" is Trat province - currently pissing down with rain, Thailand. But China, Japan and Malaysia have had the comfort of my presence in the past decade or so.

The Chinese buy a large % of it's agricultural products - fruits, rubber ....., apparently. Without them a collapse of the Thai rural economy is possible.

The piper calls the tune. As such we should all be happy that they want to buy any countries produce, rather than placing sanctions on any foreign country illegally - by international laws and agreements, as some do.

Luckily Chinese gold bars are still legal tender here. My local gold shops have no problems buying or selling them.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/552.jpg

Arms Spending May Rise as Beijing Asserts Control in South China Sea

BEIJING—
China is expected to increase its military investment in the South China Sea and significantly raise its overall defense spending to affirm its claim to the region.

The People's Liberation Army's Navy (PLAN) commissioned a new guided-missile destroyer, Yinchuan, on Tuesday, the day the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague ruled that China's claims to most of the South China Sea are invalid. The tribunal, constituted under the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS), ruled in favor of the Philippines, which had complained that China was claiming part of its territory.

The next day, China tested two new airfields it has built in the Nansha islands in the South China Sea. State media showed civilian flights taking off from the airfields to further legitimize China's control over that part of the sea. It established four light houses in the sea a few days earlier.

China has already spent a massive amount of money to rapidly build artificial islands as well as residential facilities for workers and government crews on the islands. The country has also put a floating hospital to sea and launched several submarines in the area in recent months.

Military preparedness

"This trend in militarizing the South China Sea is expected to continue and indeed expand following the PCA ruling," said Lee YingHui, research analyst at Singapore’s Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies.

The People's Liberation Army assured the nation ahead of the ruling that it stood ready to meet any challenge from the South China Sea. "The Chinese military has never been frightened," PLA spokesman Yang Yujun said in a news briefing.

Yang said that if foreign warships want to "make trouble out of nothing" in the South China Sea, then "of course we have ways to deal with it."

Some regional analysts think China has no need to be worried about any challenge in the key shipping and fishing region.

"China will continue to have relative military supremacy in the South China Sea for a long time to come, given the desolate state of the Philippine navy," Lee said.

"PLAN also enjoys home ground advantage over the U.S. navy in the South China Sea," Lee said, referring to the U.S. naval presence that, some believe, emboldened Manila to file the arbitration claim against the Asian superpower.

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin said Beijing has the right to impose an Air Identification Defense Zone (AIDZ) in the South China Sea region because it belongs to the country. The AIDZ will allow China to monitor and if necessary control flights over the martime region. Beijing, however, would need to increase defense spending to enforce an AIDZ.

Defense budget slowdown

China surprised many international defense experts this year when it said its military budget would grow at a relatively slow pace of 7.5 percent, after five years of increases topping 10 percent. This was an apparent response to a slowing Chinese economy.

Many defense analysts, however, say the official budget does not reflect massive expenditure on military-related infrastructure, such as air and sea ports, frontier rail lines and the construction of new islands.

Regional defense experts say the arbitration ruling may lead other South China Sea claimants to ramp up their defense spending. Vietnam, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines all claim portions of the waterway, which is rich in fish and believed to hold significant underwater mineral resources.

"As states squabble over sovereignty issues and increase spending to safeguard their own interests, it is the global defense industry that is the real beneficiary of the South China Sea disputes," said Jonathan Spangler, director of the South China Sea Think Tank in Taipei.

Arms Spending May Rise as Beijing Asserts Control in South China Sea

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by misskit

Yang said that if foreign warships want to "make trouble out of nothing" in the South China Sea"

---

Erm.....it seems that China has been making land out of nothing !

Complete disregard for the natural environment these assholes have.
Sometimes I suspect they're descended from an ancient alien �� race that crashed in ancient times hence their being at odds with the earth's nature.

That's why it's so unforgivable : for a very long time China was Buddhist / Taoist and there were many people who had great empathy with Nature.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by misskit

China is expected to increase its military investment

---

Does it's increase means it will overtake the Ameristani budgets?
:rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by misskit

China has already spent a massive amount of money

---

Yes, it did spend a lot and it continues to spend a lot. Most of it was as requested by the G10 countries after they royally fucked up in 2008.

Massive, of course. Take a look at unexceptional countries "Defense Spending".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by misskit

This trend in militarizing the South China Sea is expected to continue

---

One destroyer, for sure some militarisation there. Get real. Maybe the re-stationing of Ameristani troops and weapons systems coupled with stationing 2 carrier task forces in the western pacific has been a more obvious, to some, militarisation of the area.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by misskit

its military budget would grow at a relatively slow pace of 7.5 percent,

---

At th top of the page it is accused or a massive budget, which is it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

Complete disregard for the natural environment these assholes have.

---

Much better to copy the western assholes and use a few as testing sites for an H bomb or two eh. How's the flora and fauna on those coral atolls/islands/defensive weapons test sites?

Or is the rest of the world to Kowtow to those with existing "defensive weapons systems", well just because they are already there.

There does seem to be some discomfort from the UN about the body who created the arbitration award. Seems the body has nothing to do with the UN or UNCLOS. They just happen to be in the same building.
:)

Others are questioning the impartiality of the "judges" and whoever appointed the so called "judges".

http://en.people.cn/n3/2016/0716/c90000-9086845.html

"The United Nations (UN) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) recently issued statements reiterating that they have no connection to the temporary arbitral tribunal established under UNCLOS for the South China Sea case brought unilaterally by the Philippines.​

The spokesperson of UN Secretary-General also stated that “the UN doesn't have a position on the legal and procedural merits of the case or on the disputed claims” at a daily briefing on Tuesday.
On Wednesday, the UN’s official account on Sina Weibo, China’s answer to Twitter, posted that the tribunal has nothing to do with the UN.

“The ICJ, located at the Peace Palace, is the principal judicial organ of the UN, which was established in accordance with the UN Charter,” reads the post.

The Peace Place is built to house the Permanent Court of International Justice, the predecessor of the ICJ, by the Carnegie Foundation. The UN donates to the foundation annually for using the building, the post explained.
“Another tenant of the Peace Palace is the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) established in 1899, but it has no correlation with the UN,” the post further pointed out.

Former ICJ Judge Abdul Koroma confirmed the UN’s post to People’s Daily. He said that the temporary tribunal is not an UN institution and the PCA is not a court in a real sense.

“Many people who are not familiar with the situation would confuse the tribunal with the ICJ who shares the same office building,” Koroma noted.

The PCA is merely an international mediation agency that allows arbitration for non-state entities and individuals. According to Koroma, only 16 arbitration requests have been accepted in its 117-year-long history.

The ICJ also released a statement on its official website on Thursday, stating that “the Award in the South China Sea Arbitration was issued by an Arbitral Tribunal acting with the secretarial assistance of the PCA. The ICJ, which is a totally distinct institution, has had no involvement in the above mentioned case.”


I'm sure there is a very legitimate explanation which will sooth the sheeps sleepless nights worries.

International Law, brought to you by illegal means. Something to suck on.

:)

Weather News .
Unexpected dry and sunny weather in Trat province has disrupted farmers sleeping and drinking. More heavy rain is forecast so the anxiety faced today, will soon disappear.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

You do realise those medals are solid gold.

---

Really? Excellent tailoring then, because the weight of them would pull down the front of the tunic quite a lot. And some of that "solid gold" looks a bit sliverish.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Care to name a country where the "slave" labour is not rife and abused?

---

Many. Many, many, many. Too many to mention.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

use a few as testing sites for an H bomb

---

Sounds like a good idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maanaam

because the weight of them would pull down the front of the tunic quite a lot

---

Not really, all Chinese military never go anywhere without their kevlar lined waistcoats which have special loops for the "gold" medals. You know like some military men never let go of their rifle.
You believe everything I post? Maybe I need to add the sarc icon more.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Many. Many, many, many. Too many to mention

---

OK, just one then.

It's not a matter of this muppet liking the Chinese. Rather that he is rabidly anti-western.

Wouldn't be surprised if he joins IS/Daesh in the near future, and blows his amoeba-like self to bits.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Baas Babelaas

Wouldn't be surprised if he joins IS/Daesh in the near future

---

He is a keyboard propagandist nothing more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bsnub

He is a keyboard propagandist nothing more.

---

Praise indeed! Did anybody think otherwise? Living in a wet humid country does things to ones mind, nearly the same a living in a wet and cold but not so extreme.
:)

China Rhetoric Turns Tough After Unfavorable Tribunal Ruling

In an attempt to maximize its gains in the South China Sea dispute, the Chinese military is getting tough in its rhetoric, a sign analysts say that in comparison to the U.S.’s quiet diplomacy Beijing is adopting a dual-track strategy, following an unfavorable international arbitration ruling.

During a meeting with U.S. Chief of Naval Operations John Richardson in Beijing this week, Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy Commander Wu Shengli vowed that China is ready to counter aggression in the South China Sea.

He was quoted as saying on CCTV the Chinese navy is prepared to react to any infringement of rights or aggression and efforts to force China to succumb to pressure will be counterproductive.

He added construction around the Spratly Islands will continue, while any decision to build up defense facilities will be pending based on the level of threat.

Meanwhile, China’s air force has confirmed that it conducted a “combat overflight” of the disputed Scarborough Shoal, which would become “routine practice” in the future, while another navy officer warned that any freedom of navigation patrols carried out by foreign navies in the disputed waters would lead to “disaster.”

But Admiral Wu also praised Richardson’s visit, which coincided with China’s launch of another three-day military drill near Hainan Island this week. He said the trip showed both countries understand the need to beef up communication and contain the risk of confrontations.

In a case brought by the Philippines, a court in The Hague last week dismissed Beijing's claim of sovereignty over the nearly 3.5 million-square-kilometers of the South China Sea.

Hard line, soft line

All the tough rhetoric is evidence of China’s continued application of military pressure, said Shao Jianping, an associate professor of international relations from Honghe University, during a seminar on Monday.

But that doesn’t mean that China will cease its diplomatic engagement with Asian neighbors by “playing both a hard and soft line,” in order to maximize the country’s interest in the dispute, he added.

Yet Wu Fei, a professor at Jinan University, disagreed, saying the tough stance represents China’s lack of a clear strategy.

“The reason why China has exhibited a tough gesture is that China is not clear of its own strategy. Neither China nor surrounding countries are sure about the intention of the other parties,” Wu said.

The professor expects China to forge a clear policy as it resumes bilateral talks with neighboring countries.

Domestic considerations

Also, the hard line has a domestic element to it, catering to the rise of nationalism in China for Chinese leaders to consolidate their grip of power, according to another observer.

“On the domestic fronts, [President] Xi Jinping doesn’t want to get the nationalists offsite. His anti-corruption program, his restructuring — China has got a lot of key constituencies within the country. He can’t really afford to get the nationalists offsite,” said Tim Johnston, director of Asia Program at Crisis Group.

The observer argued the fact China didn’t get tougher by announcing an air defense identification zone and the United States didn’t carry out a high-profile freedom of navigation patrol over the past week shows that neither China nor the United States want war in the South China Sea.

Ren Xiao, a professor of international studies at Fudan University, agreed, saying both militaries have established rules to follow to avoid direct clashes in the disputed region, although the chance of miscalculation cannot be ruled out completely.

“A greater risk lies with potential clashes over the air as a result of the pace [of the air force]. But I expect both countries to avoid such a risk,” Ren said.

The Crisis Group’s Richardson viewed last week’s court verdict against Beijing’s nine-dash-line territorial claims as a restart for all the dispute’s claimants to return to a more realistic negotiation although the ruling itself carried a moral dimension, which will give other claimants more weight on their side of table, he said.

All politics and diplomacy is about flexibility and compromises - and the South China Sea dispute is no different, Richard said.

China Rhetoric Turns Tough After Unfavorable Tribunal Ruling

Philippines rejects talks with China after arbitration

MANILA, Philippines – The Philippines has rejected China’s request for talks on the South China Sea dispute because it asked Manila to “disregard” a court ruling on the issue, the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said yesterday.

“They asked us to open ourselves for bilateral negotiations but outside of and in disregard of the arbitral ruling. This is something that I told him was not consistent with our Constitution and our national interest,” Foreign Secretary Perfecto Yasay Jr. said, referring to his Chinese counterpart.

Yasay said in an interview with ABS-CBN that he and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi discussed the possibility of bilateral talks on the sidelines of an Asia-Europe summit in Mongolia last weekend but made no headway.

During the meeting, Yasay said the Chinese insisted that the Philippines not make any comment about the ruling.

Yasay said he told Wang that bilateral talks could not be conducted without using the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision as a basis for the meetings.

“We would like to discuss with you how your fishermen would have access in that area, but not in the context of the arbitral tribunal,” Yasay quoted Wang as telling him in Mongolia.

“They said, ‘If you will insist on the ruling, discussing along those lines, then we might be headed for a confrontation’,” he added.

The remark about confrontation, Yasay said, has not only been the line of the Chinese foreign minister but also of Chinese Ambassador Zhao Jianhua when he discussed the South China Sea dispute with him.

The DFA chief said direct talks with China over the maritime flashpoint were unlikely to start anytime soon due to Beijing’s refusal to accept the ruling.

He said President Duterte’s priority was to regain access to Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal for Filipino fishermen.

“We have asked China to exercise restraint and sobriety in this regard, that we maintain the status quo for now in terms of not taking aggressive actions... not coming out with any provocative statements,” he added.

Duterte said the Philippines would not yield its territorial rights in the West Philippine Sea to China, as he vowed to stick to the ruling of the international tribunal on the maritime row.

Duterte gave the assurance during the courtesy call of a US congressional delegation yesterday at Malacañang.

“Just out of a meeting with new Philippine President Duterte. He assured us he has no plans to negotiate with China over island dispute,” Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy posted on Twitter.

Malacañang has yet to confirm Murphy’s tweets.

The meeting was attended by Yasay, Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana, Trade Secretary Ramon Lopez and Defense Assistant Secretary Raymund Jose Quilop.

Last week, Duterte asked former president Fidel Ramos to talk to Chinese officials, saying the Philippines would continue to resolve the sea dispute through diplomatic means.

Yasay to keep post
Meanwhile, Duterte said he has no plans to remove Yasay as DFA chief and concurrent government spokesman on the sea dispute.

Duterte said Yasay continues to enjoy his trust and that everything he says with regard to foreign policy has his blessing.

“Yasay speaks for me. Everything that he says in public, both national and international, comes from my guidance, and he has my backing and full support,” Duterte said.

Duterte praised Yasay, whom he said agreed to join his government despite his job as an educator.

He said Yasay accepted the post on condition that he would only serve for a few months because of his obligations as professor of universities in the US.

Philippines rejects talks with China after arbitration | Headlines, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com

Good stuff. The bullies were told to piss off.

Meanwhile the local airlines are opening up Nansha islands. Commercial jets will be arriving with holiday makers soon, not missiles.

Pics of some leggy maidens.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/847.jpg

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/848.jpg

Does one need a visa to travel to the islands and if so, which countries embassy should one apply to? :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Does one need a visa to travel to the islands and if so, which countries embassy should one apply to?

---

I think your Chinese Passport covers you there, Bloho. And with that Minister of Propoganda emblem on the cover, you're a shoe-in.

^^TD's fruitcake chinese bot buys into the latest transparent fakery from the chinks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Latindancer

First China dams the Mekong, screwing up fishing in the delta (not to mention upstream) , now this.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cujo

Complete disregard for the natural environment these assholes have. Sometimes I suspect they're descended from an ancient alien �� race that crashed in ancient times hence their being at odds with the earth's nature.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Latindancer

That's why it's so unforgivable

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

Sounds like a good idea.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Baas Babelaas

It's not a matter of this muppet liking the Chinese. Rather that he is rabidly anti-western.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bsnub

He is a keyboard propagandist nothing more.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Looper

^^TD's fruitcake chinese bot buys into the latest transparent fakery from the chinks

---

it is so easy to lead you guys to post your bigoted opinions. Your racism precedes your brains ability to think and reason, your opinion is formed prior to typing ........

Do I prick you balloons with alacrity.

You cry about the environment that China is destroying. When China tries to reduce it's impact on the environment and decrease global pollution they are taken to the WTO, by the biggest worldwide polluter of all, and it's vassals.

US expands challenge to China's restraints on raw material export at WTO - Global Times

US expands challenge to China's restraints on raw material export at WTO

"The United States on Tuesday expanded its challenge at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to China's export restraints on key raw materials.

It requested consultation with China on the country's export duties on chromium, as well as China's export quotas on antimony, indium, magnesia, talc and tin, said the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR).

USTR claimed that China's export restraints on these materials, including duties and quotas, provide an unfair competitive advantage to China at the expense of American workers and manufacturers.

On Tuesday, the European Union also launched a legal challenge at the WTO to China's duty and quota requirements on the export of 11 raw materials, including graphite, cobalt, copper, lead, chromium, magnesium, talcum, tantalum, tin, antimony and indium.

China's Ministry of Commerce (MOC) said in a statement Tuesday that the duty and quota requirements on the export of 11 raw materials conform to WTO rules,

The export controls on graphite, cobalt, copper, lead, chromium, magnesium, talcum, tantalum, tin, antimony and indium are imposed to protect the country's resources and the environment, said the statement.

The MOC said China will properly handle the case in accordance with WTO dispute settlement procedures.

The US challenges over China's export restraints on raw materials came at a time of increasing anti-trade rhetoric in the current US presidential campaign."

Says the organisations which bans imports from countries on unfounded, illegal, immoral, undefined "security" grounds. Hypocrites.
Oh dear, do the Ameristanis and the EU wish to be known as anti-environmentally friendly countries, a global polluter in developing countries forever? This puts China on the upper step of environmentally friendly countries, a gold medal performance. What will Greenpeace do call for world sanctions against the two muppet countries.

Tighten the vice on those balls China, make the fuckers pay for their illegal, immoral practices against you.

Do you like ice cream on the blowback. :rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrG

I think your Chinese Passport covers you there, Bloho

---

It was in my contract acceptance negotiations. Unfortunately I was informed that, due to the Opium Wars, no UK citizen will ever be allowed to hold the passport with the "Famous Five" stars embossed on it.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/850.jpg


Pity I did read all the books as a child. Enid even wrote a book about an Island in the China Sea.
:confused:


https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/07/851.jpg

I seen today that the Nasty Yellow scum went mad in Beijing yesty protesting about KFC take out and smashing their Smart phones.

They done this to protest about the Wests imperialism and the Ruling going against them. :confused:

Their Smart phones where fakes for sure and I'll bet they are now back scoffing their fat ugly faces with KFC. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by terry57

Their Smart phones where fakes for sure

---

It's called innovation take the most sold product, redesign it and sell it. Unfortunately many countries put Chinese electronics on the "security sanction/ban" list so many are unable to take advantage of superior products for less money.

Your government political appointees "protecting" you or their imaginary/manipulated stock markets and campaign funders?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

It's called innovation take the most sold product, redesign it and sell it.

---

Umm that is the opposite of innovation. :rolleyes:

It must be tough being a cracker, and hating all crackers.

That's like being Chinese, and hating all Chinese.

Suffer on, buffoon.

OhOh, your arguments are based on logical fallacies.