^ I was hoping you could enlighten us mate. You do think Welsh are smarter than Aussies and have a better education system yeah? And you seem to be an expert on the subject with all the claims you're making.
You could also try answering a question or two.
??What initiatives are the Aus. Government lacking to acheive this goal
Do you actually know anything about Finland, Australia and their relationship regarding education? Or are you just trolling?
^^
PM me if you've got her phone #.
^ Haha, that's good for you ENT. Nice one.
PM me for the answer to questions;
1) = Balls.
2) = I have an answer for that on another thread.
Back to topic.
David Icke suggested that alternative views existed regarding normally accepted beliefs held by all people.
Everyone seeing the video will remember 60%<75% immediately after, as a norm.
This is reduced to 20% memory of the event after a few days or so.
A month later, only iconic memories will remain to recall clearly that which you perceived.
Based on that assumption.
Any further contributions?
Just another unidentifiable flying object.
That will do, to test any witness' memory and credulity.
Is your mind a little more disorganized than usual today, ENT ?
Have a rough night scanning the heavens ? Or did you spend it trolling under your other nickname ?
Last time I tried to contribute and engage your request for input you shot it down in a flame of ignorance. I'm still upset about that.Originally Posted by ENT
I answered you politely, several times on that issue.
No you didn't. You did respond, but it was hardly polite, and got no insight whatsoever into your thoughts on that type of extra-terrestrial experience. Don't worry, I'm slowly getting over it. With time I'll be OK.Originally Posted by ENT
It seems to me that if it was a drug induced event, it is called a psychosis, as are all visions presumed to be.
Art is a psychotic process, for instance, as it involves vision and its expression in terms that are not always intelligible in the norm.
The contents of the link you have not pasted.
you did so with only one point.
You avoided mentioning the other three links which put the whole point into perspective.
The links are in;
Post #s 612, 613 and 616, this thread.
Quote them if you dare.
Cool, a few decent comments.Originally Posted by ENT
There are other forms of psychosis other than drug induced. That's the point I made earlier. Now how do you think this relates to UFO's / alien abductions and such claimed experiences?
Only anecdotal evidence is known to exist of alien abductions.
No physical evidence to prove the event.
Could be a psychosis.
Falling in love is a psychosis.
The sightings reported of unusual flying craft are documented both in written repots and in visual documentation.
These documented evidences are not the result of a psychosis, but of a carefully selected sample of creditable reports.
NASA and related sites yield some of the most credible information.
The Hubble telescope has yielded several images of strange craft like shapes/objects and other anomalous objects or entities in the space around us, especially outside of our immediate atmosphere.
Many govs. have now released "Secret" UFO docs and no explanation given for any of the recorded, witnessed, verified accounts.
So why the stonewalling?
No idea. Probably the same reason astral plane interaction is stonewalled and fobbed off as psychosis.Originally Posted by ENT
Psychosis is a clinical term used to describe an event in the mind where both the psyche and the soma reach a statis, upon which may occur satis.
A psycho-somatic experience.
LSD can induce such an experience.
So can other agents.
The astral plane experience can be induced or occur otherwise.
^ Do you agree then that it's possible for extra-terrestrial / astral plane encounters to be dismissed as clinical psychosis regardless of the method in which said psychosis was induced?
So I take it that ENT is also Hansuman?
Imagine if one saw a set of lights bobbing along the sky line at night, and on getting nearer, appeared to be an ovoid shaped object. This object then noiselessly passing by on it's erratic path to disappear into a single, low stationary cloud in the otherwise clear sky. The cloud then proceeding NE at a rapid rate of knots, disappearing over the low hills.
What would you think that thing was?
a) hallucination.
b) secret experiment
c) new kind of silent aircraft
d) weather balloon
e) blimp
f) the rising of Venus
g) terrible spectacles
h) unidentifiable flying ovoid
i) a head ache.
After the event, would you;
a) Call the police
b) Fall over
c) Go home and have a rest
d) Tell your missus
e) Tell your mates
f) Tell anyone
g) Become an alcoholic.
Has anyone seen such a thing?
Any replies and opinions on the matter are welcome.
Go on, be brave.![]()
If you want a cross-section of opinion on it, start a thread about it. See how many fish you catch.
Last edited by Latindancer; 20-12-2011 at 07:51 AM.
It seems no one's interested in sharing their UFO experiences with you ENT.
maybe because the aliens tell us not to.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)