Printable View
Kind of like Einstein eh. He said himself he wasn't overly smart per se, but had the ability to focus on a single problem for an extraordinary long period of time. This may be the case with ENT, and he could give us the latest breakthrough in meta-physics. That's if he shifted his focus away from obsessive internet trolling and stalking. Waste of pure talent and genius is ENT.
Thank you for the complement.Quote:
Originally Posted by 9999
Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% dedicated application to the subject on hand.
The stalking I've observed in this case is done by the three "wise" ockers from the east, trying to follow a wandering star.
See ENT, positive and civil, it's not hard, and doesn't it feel much better?
A gift demands a gift.
And what is unacceptable may be returned.
Yes, and a native of NZ. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoNo, you said anyone born in the country is a native of and therefore indigenous to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
This
Has quite a DIFFERENT meaning, which I understand may not be immediately obvious to the less sharp among us (you).Quote:
1. originating in and characteristic of a particular region or country; native (often followed by to ):
Because someone was born in a place does not mean they 'originated' there or are characteristic of that place.
If an Indian were born in NZ do you think he would be Characteristic of NZ?
Still banging on about that, ENT ? Getting caught up in the trees without seeing the forest ? That wasn't the point anyway. The study you quoted referred to Australian aboriginal people.
So he would be indigenous to New Zealand?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTYes, and a native of NZ. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoNo, you said anyone born in the country is a native of and therefore indigenous to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
This
Has quite a DIFFERENT meaning, which I understand may not be immediately obvious to the less sharp among us (you).Quote:
1. originating in and characteristic of a particular region or country; native (often followed by to ):
Because someone was born in a place does not mean they 'originated' there or are characteristic of that place.
If an Indian were born in NZ do you think he would be Characteristic of NZ?
He certainly wouldn't be characteristic of a NZ.
But as latin dancer pointed out, the only thing that survey concluded was that the idigenous aboriginal people of Australia, colloquially refered to as 'abbos', are the thickest indigenous people on the planet.
I'm not surprised.
^
You haven't been to NZ :)
I didn't quote a study.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
I posted four links.
Do you mean a metro man? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyFree
^
It took you 1 1/2 hours to think of that?
Longer.
ENT has this woods/trees problem.
For instance, if asked the question what is 1+6;
ENT would probably say 7
Most would see it's a gangbang.
Which is what's happening here.
That's the hilarious part ! He tells us "you just keep coming back for more", including this smiley :tieme:
but it's HE who is getting punished, and it's obvious to all....as Flyfree has confirmed.
You went to an English public school... right, ENT ?
You posted one linkQuote:
Originally Posted by ENTI didn't quote a study.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
I posted four links.
which led us to this.Quote:
https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...n/post_old.gif 15-12-2011, 02:29 PM #603 (permalink) ENT
Thailand Expat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chiangmai
Posts: 2,287
https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...tation_off.gif
Check this out ockers.
World’s Average IQ Distribution Map : Sabahan.com
Quote:
The map referenced by this article was taken from the book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis” by Richard Lynn. The book focuses on intelligence per race NOT nationality. Richard and Co “tested” (actually just used others research) approximately 813,778 individuals worldwide so basically 0.01% of the worlds population. The people tested were only those indigenous to each country, so for Australia only 2.4% (approximately 400, 000 people) of the population is indigenous, whereas Asia has an indigenous population of 70%.
References
Race Differences in Intelligence (book) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indigenous peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
World population - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
University of Cincinnati Official Athletic Site
Are you saying the Maoris are thicker than the Abbos?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Apparently not according to the study you directed us to.
(And my personal experience)
Oh yes...he tries to make a point, and posts links. But the links do not support his point. Sometimes, comically, they support the contrary view. Then he denies any connection with information in the links, saying that they were only links he posted.
This is why I call him a fence-sitter, ready to jump either way.
.
.
Wrong again, little tefler. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
No, your assumption is the product of your skewed logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoAre you saying the Maoris are thicker than the Abbos?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Apparently not according to the study you directed us to.
(And my personal experience)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoYou posted one linkQuote:
Originally Posted by ENTI didn't quote a study.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
I posted four links.
which led us to this.Quote:
https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...n/post_old.gif 15-12-2011, 02:29 PM #603 (permalink) ENT
Thailand Expat
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chiangmai
Posts: 2,287
https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...tation_off.gif
Check this out ockers.
World’s Average IQ Distribution Map : Sabahan.com
Quote:
The map referenced by this article was taken from the book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis” by Richard Lynn. The book focuses on intelligence per race NOT nationality. Richard and Co “tested” (actually just used others research) approximately 813,778 individuals worldwide so basically 0.01% of the worlds population. The people tested were only those indigenous to each country, so for Australia only 2.4% (approximately 400, 000 people) of the population is indigenous, whereas Asia has an indigenous population of 70%.
References
Race Differences in Intelligence (book) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indigenous peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
World population - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
University of Cincinnati Official Athletic Site
Not very clever Koojo.
There were three links to IQ levels posted,
None were very flattering of Australia.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyFree
Not being an Ocker, gangbangs are unknown by "most" in my culture.
That practice originated in Oz, as part of the "Bankstown bodgies" hoon trip into King's X and elsewhere in the 1960's.
Since there was a shortage of women in Oz at the time, the "men" had to share it around a bit, so gangbanging took over from sheepshagging in the Sydney suburbs.
A practice you're familiar with, it seems.
uh huh. Like Wales is leading the world in education and research :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You should check out the real figures ENT.
I actually just watched a doco called 'The Finland Phenomena', which looked at Finland's approach to education. They pump up some pretty smart kids, and Australia is moving towards educating on this model. Not that this will help with our inherintly indegenous low IQ's :rolleyes:
^
What are the "real" figures?
Gonna be a long slow move for Oz to get to Finland's model.
Certainly won't help re. Ocker indegenes, going by your spelling of (sic) "inherintly", above.
The 'real' figures are not an article on abos. The real figures rank Australia higher than Wales for IQ as well as most other fields. Funny how you posted a link to that obscure article when the real figures are readily available and easy to find.
Pointing out spelling mistakes just makes posters look like anal wankers. You can do better than that, considering you're a full time multi-nicking troll.
So, ENT, tell us, where does Australia really rank in terms of IQ and education compared to Wales?
What makes you say that. What initiatives are the Aus. Government lacking to acheive this goal, apart from an inharuntly stooopid population?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Are we moving to far away from the sophisticated Welsh model?