nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
:)
nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
:)
Obviously, you do realise that aliens must have helped the merikans build that space craft, fok me they can't even in this day and age keep planes safely in the air, so I should think most of the space craft was made by aliens for the merikans.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
I find the lack of any sort of crater very odd.
bad planning on the part of the film makers.
https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif
Actually you should. It does provide some explanations to many of the questions posed here. But if your minds made up don't bother.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
^^Starwars was a lot better...
i have seen and read plenty enough about the counter claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
i simply don't believe it happened on the balance of evidence.
This was even worse planning from the film makers, they forgot to remove a coke bottle............
Australian Viewers See Something That Proves Apollo 11 Was A FakeIn western Australia during the live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing, several people saw a very unusual occurrence. One viewer, Una Ronald watched the telecast and was astonished with what she saw.
The residents of Honeysuckle Creek, Australia, actually saw a different broadcast to the rest of the World. Just shortly before Armstrong stepped onto the Moons surface, a change could be seen where the picture goes from a stark black to a brighter picture. Honeysuckle Creek stayed with the picture and although the voice transmissions were broadcast from Goldstone, the actual film footage was broadcast from Australia. As Una watched Armstrong walking on the surface of the Moon she spotted a Coke bottle that was kicked in the right hand side of the picture. This was in the early hours of the morning and she phoned her friends to see if they had seen the same thing, unfortunately they had missed it but were going to watch the rebroadcast the next day. Needless to say, the footage had been edited and the offending Coke bottle had been cut out of the film. But several other viewers had seen the bottle and many articles appeared in The West Australian newspaper.
The Apollo Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
why is it odd? have you been to the moon and seen the ground totally covered with craters?
Course they did I were one. A resident alien from Canada. Even had to carry around a green card to prove it. Now that you remind me, I really hated that term. "Alien Resident".Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtydog
^^
i mean a crater created by the lunar module on landing.
surely it would have displaced a hell of a lot of dust.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
oh alright then
you don't believe any of the evidence, you believe the conspiracy cover-up theory, that's fine
All I know, is that if it was a cover-up, there would have been someone blabbing on the internet by now revealing all, getting their 15 minutes worth
or even anonymously
but there has been nothing, zilch, nada
Balance of the evidence! The clip I gave was a film company trying to replicate the alleged hoax by filming in the desert.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiangMai noon
of course there has.Quote:
Originally Posted by DrAndy
plenty of NASA scientists have spoken up.
i know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
there was a good show on a while back, can't remember what it was called.
special effects experts recreating famous ghost and UFO type films.
they used to do a passable job but never fully hit the nail.
quite difficult to re create with absolute accuracy.
links please, for the blabbers
How did man manage to collect the rock samples if we didn't go to the Moon???
750 lbs or so were said to be collected on the Apollo missions. This maybe so, but according to official NASA records, only a couple of pounds were actually collected by the astronauts. It would not be impossible to irradiate a rock or put it in a vacuum to get the same results.
Did you know that two years before the Apollo 11 mission, its lead scientist Dr. Werner Van Braun made a trip to Antartica which is a prime area for collection Moon rocks?
The moons gravity is 1/6 of the earths. At the last stage of descent they wouldnt need a massive blast of propulsion to slow them down, more of a thud down than a blast down.
oh, it is getting a bit late, have to go out
dinner on the moon tonight, should be fun
thanks
This one?Quote:
Originally Posted by DrAndy
Moonlanding Hoax
How could they prove it's capable of getting there and landing if it hasn't?Quote:
Originally Posted by DrAndy
If Man were so successful at landing on the Moon over 30 years ago, why haven't we been back? In The Ride report, a report headed by Sally Ride, a former astronaut herself, an estimation was made on how long it would take to make a similar trip to the Moon today. If NASA were fully funded in 1987, they estimated that they could land men on the Moon by 2010, that's 23 years... Since it only took 8 years from President Kennedy's announcement till the first mission, why would it take 23 years to send man back to the Moon for the 7th time?
In 1999 this estimate changed. Douglas Cook, Director of the Exploration Office at Houston's Johnson Space Centre calculated that Man could go back to the Moon within 100 years.... I'm not holding my breath!!!
The Apollo Hoax
^
to follow up, i doubt the technology really existed.
Moon Landing Hoax Top 10 Reasons Moon Hoax Documentary Films
Almost 40 years ago, with *combined CSM and LM guidance computer memory totaling only 10.3% [152kb] of a common 1.4MB [1474.56kb] floppy disk, NASA claims to have traveled 60,000% as far as any other manned spacecraft has gone before or since. Basically a household calculator (or discount watch) took 27 men [Apollo 8 to 17] to the moon and back, with the help of slide rules - accounting for fuel consumption, angle of approach, lunar landing, rate of descent, and so on. Yet at a distance of under 300 miles from Earth, we have lost the lives of 14 Shuttle astronauts who never left Earth orbit. In 9 trips there were no incidents involving small meteors. Yes, Space is a big place - but no injuries or damage except Apollo 13's apparent self-inflicted wound? Van Allen made it clear in his 1958-59 report that travelers to the moon would need go around the belts, approaching the moon by first departing through the space directly above the the north or south poles of the Earth. These limitations alone, make the trip to the moon a theory, and not a fact.
Nortons vid.
YouTube - Man Landed on the Moon
Consider this, The distance that Man allegedly had to travel to get to the Moon was the equivalent of 30 Earth diameters. Now compare that with the greatest distance that Man has travelled since then (in the Shuttle) which is 400 miles. That is the equivalent of just 1/2 an inch from the Earth compared to the distance travelled to the Moon.
Von Braun said in his book 'Conquest To The Moon' (published in 1953) that it would be impossible to send anyone to the Moon because of the sheer size of craft needed to do the trip. In fact, taking Von Braun's calculations into consideration, a spaceship that needed to travel that distance would have had to be 266 times bigger than the Saturn 5.
Also consider the recent announcement from NASA that it would take scientists 15 years from now to design and build a craft to go back to the Moon. Why when we have allegedly been there 6 times already?
J. F. Kennedy announced in 1962 that Man would travel to the Moon by the end of the decade. Just 7 years later Man allegedly did just that. But more than 35 years later in a World that is vastly technologically superior to the 1960's, why would it take over twice as long to do the same thing today?
^'Ealth and safety 'ent it :)