Please do not be unkind to IJWT. He is a sensitive boy
(Used to be a member here too)
Printable View
^
its seems the only good thing about " steven " is he is over there and we are over here. :)
lets keep it that way shall we.
Here's my warning.
I replied...Quote:
Since you seem dissatisfied with the moderation on this forum, you will now have 10 days of relief from posting on it.
As most of your warnings are related to this issue, you may wish to examine your motivations for posting on TV.
"Steven"
True isn't it.Quote:
What thread are you referring too?
If you are making a suspension on this comment
"The bottom line is they do not know how to manage a forum on world politics (for example), it would be out of control before the week is out."
Then its not about dissatisfaction, its the real reason why these sub forums are not allowed on TV.
The subject has been brought up many times before and always a mod will explain that this the reason why we can have no world politics on here, it's simply not easy enough for them to control.
Ask any mod or admin and they will agree with you. They have already tried it before hence the bearpit coming about.
This is information I have heard from mods and repeated in that thread.
Well at least he come back quickly
10 days holiday for me I think.Quote:
I will post your reply in the mods room, and if the other mods back you up I will remove the warning.
how many you got up now madness.?
you must be getting close to getting the arse.
I remember when people weren't allowed to talk about bedlam outside of bedlam, that has changed now, maybe they will change their views and rules on talking about moderation aswell, don't know why george always wants this stuff kept quiet, seems silly to me.
https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif
Look it's the Samsung 300 post laser printer
Yes you heard me right
300
I think BKK Madness should get another 10 day suspension for his sheer temerity. (i.e answering back)
Possibly 11
I think you should go and read that corkscews latest thread about the new benz he bought for his wife.
OK, politically & gender incorrect, but I'm a woman, so I can say it :p
Does anyone else think it's "Steven's" time of the month?
Well, that explains Steven, but what about Pattaya Fox's "owning" weho all the time? And I'm not complaining that much about senai, because it was just the once, but others seem to have had troubles with that one. It seems to be an endemic problem of either too much discretion being given to Mods who shouldn't have it; or too much control from the top being administered with an iron hand. I'm fairly new around these forums. You guys know better than me.
Well we have bantered on now coz he's fine to talk too. I have asked him to clarify what rule I broke. I have also asked if Brit has received a suspsenion for saying the same thing 6 posts earlier (sorry Brit!).
He thanked me for my restrained manner and suggested that is other members were as polite and restrained then maybe they could communicate better. I honestly feel is thinks he is talking to children in his replies, I told him I wasn't a wild animal that needs to be restrained (possibly coz not drunk yet).:)
Anyway, see what he comes back with he said I would have to wait until tomorrow but I don't see why don't see why I should be inconvenienced over his mistake.
i've been in communication this morning with one of the mods and i wrote:
i refer you specifically to pretty much anything ijwt touches these days. Maybe he's having discipline probs with his students or something but that shouldn't be carried over /compensated for here on the forum.
The amount of threads closed by him in the past few days is sickening. And his pissy school teacher attitude is boring.
I don't mean to sound like I'm bashing him, but the guys having issues about something and it's spilling over into his moderation duties in my humble opinion and I think that should be considered by his peers.
i await a reply
^^
jeez madness,
your shagging " steven " aint ya.? :)
I think it's mainly the one I've highlighted, although some of the other. Many of the mods on there are OK (here come my first reds!! :p). Some even manipulate the rules to do the "right" thing, but still leaving the message intact. There are some that are drunk, high & Lord knows what else on "the power" though. That's my opinion.
^^^
nice work kayo, and this is what needs to be communicated back to the mods.
Member/mod communications start to break down.
bkkmadness...
IJWTQuote:
The rules need to be set out clearer as well. Just reading through and noticed there is no rule about being dissatified about forum moderation. And since an individual moderation action wasn't discussed can you just clarify what exact rule I have broken?
Because thinking now why should I wait until tomorrow, if I haven't even broken a rule? I seem to have been inconvenienced because of your mistake here haven't I?
Quote:
And things were going so nicely. *This* is the point at which I say that I am doing what is necessary to investigate your request for clarification, and I don't expect to hear further from you on this issue. I will let you know when/if the request is processed. Don't call me, I'll call you.
Having read all the opinions I'd vote for NR's theory.
:bunny3:
^
jeez madness,
your going to give " steven " a nervous breakdown. :)
Well, I'm on holiday :-) But it seems I got off lightly; I've only got three days.
What a sad guy. Universally despised by just about every poster and - I've been told confidentially - several of the moderators too.
The mods there are not as tight knit as they lead you to believe.
^
That's a 'no-shitter' for sure...