If you have a double entry , immigration draw a number one in a circle to show that your first entry visa has been used up.Originally Posted by dirtydog
Not sure what they do with multiple entry
If you have a double entry , immigration draw a number one in a circle to show that your first entry visa has been used up.Originally Posted by dirtydog
Not sure what they do with multiple entry
The term "visa on arrival" is the same as "visa waiver" which is a bit confusing to say the least.
You do not get a visa on arrival you get a 'permission to stay'Originally Posted by dirtydog
it is not a visa.
Finally a concrete answer. So I ask for TM7 to get my 1 year extension entry on my non-immigrant O within the first 3 months of my initial stay. Correct ?Originally Posted by RDN
Once I have the 1 year stay extension, I will still need to report to the police every 3 months, correct ? how flexible is that ? what if you miss or don't go ?
Totally wrong. Please look here: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kingdom of Thailand : : Visas & Travel Document
You can apply for your extension up to 30 days before your permission to stay expires. Your first extension will be for 9 months only.Originally Posted by Butterfly
The 90 day report I do by post and is very easy.
You can only be late by seven days or you get fined.
Yes, the TM7 is for one year extensions, but I don't know enough about your circumstances to comment on whether you qualify. But you could do worse than go to talk to them at Soi Suan Phlu and explain your circumstances.
Yes, you should report every 90 days, plus or minus 7 days - but to immigration, not the police. I always try to go early. (In theory, for people living in the sticks far from an immigration office, you should be able to report to the police. But I don't know of anyone who has managed to do that. You can also send your 90 day notification by post to immigration but, again, I have never done that, but I have heard of others that have without problems.)
If you miss a report or don't go AND you get caught, you will will have to pay a fine which is I believe currently 2,000 baht. If you manage to leave the country without anyone at the airport noticing that you haven't reported, then you may avoid the fine - just come back in again and the 90 day clock starts again.
But you must get a re-entry permit to enable your one-year extension to continue. Otherwise, that is cancelled and you have to start again.
Edit:
Thetyim says it much more succinctly!
Last edited by RDN; 03-09-2006 at 11:57 PM.
There is a "re-entry permit" booth at the Airport, now I know why it's there. How long does it take to have it ? or can you go to any immigration office to get it ?Originally Posted by RDN
Butterfly, I'm off to bed now.
If I get time I will PM you tommorrow with a couple of tips on getting your extension
You can go to any immigration office,Originally Posted by Butterfly
It takes about 15 minutes
I should think it takes just minutes. My multiple re-entry permit took a few minutes because a girl in the immigration office filled in the form for me, but at the airport I should think they would be quicker.
But I would get it at immigration if I were you - what happens if the airport booth is shut when you go? Best to get it sorted early at immigration. You can get it at any time.
Forms and details of everything here.
https://teakdoor.com/thai-visas-and-v...hich-visa.html
Ssssshhhh.... can I say my peace RDN? So there I was just minding my own business - coming back after a weekend in Singapore - since the Thai red tape had screwed me around once again, I thought I'd better leave the country on a "real" visa run while trying to process my legit visa application - and next thing I know the airline is grilling me to the point where am wondering who will water my plants at home before they die a slow and lonely death. Who are you? When are you leaivng Thailand? Why don't you have an outward ticket? When are you leaving? Why are you going back there? All this after living in LOS for just over a year after 3 yrs on a work permit.... what the??? After finally re-entering LOS - mai pben rai - stamped in as usual - but the stress, the stress - at the other end!!
And you were unsuccessful because you cannot extend a visaOriginally Posted by NickA
You might have extended your 'Permission to Stay ' though
Some would call us pedantic, but I have to agree that this is a distinction with a difference....Originally Posted by Thetyim
Go tell wikipedia!!!Originally Posted by Thetyim
Thank you NickAOriginally Posted by NickA
From Wikipedia :
"Visas are associated with the request for permission to enter a country, and are thus, for some countries, distinct from actual formal permission for an alien to enter and remain in the country."
^^again from Wikipedia...
I'm not arguing with you about whether you are right or wrog Thetyim, dear friend, because we both know you are right. all I'm saying is that it is common usage to say "extending a visa" rather then "extending permission to stay". Everyone I know uses the first expression and nobody the second and so the first is understood to mean the second, if you know what I meanExtending a Visa
Visa Run example
Many countries have a mechanism to allow the holder of a visa to apply to stay longer in that country. For example, in Denmark a visa holder can apply to the Danish Immigration Service for a Residence Permit after they have arrived in the Country. In the United Kingdom applications can be made to the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. In certain circumstances, it is not possible for the holder of the visa to do this, either because the Country does not have a mechanism to prolong visas or, most likely, because the holder of the visa is using a short stay visa to live in a country. In such cases, the holder often engages in what is known as a visa run; leaving the country for a short period in order to apply for a new visa prior to their return or so that they can be given a fresh permission to stay when they re-enter.
Well NickA, the problem is that the imprecise terminology can result in problems. For example, I made a needless trip to Bangkok to "renew my visa" because my visa had expired. Of course, the trip was a huge waste of time because you can't renew a visa. On that trip I was also unable to "extend my stay" because my "stay" wouldn't expire for another nine months.
I've also heard of guys who have "extended their stay" thinking they have extended their visa. The leave the country thinking their visa is still valid (why not, they "extended" it); only to re-enter and get nothing more than a 30 day entry stamp. Why? No visa. No re-entry permit. Time to start all over....
So, although I agree that while "extending a visa" has become common parlance, sites like this one that purport to extend accurate information ought not use it.
I fully agree with you and Thetyim.Originally Posted by buadhai
I've meet people here who think they are here on a 30 day visa, some of them even believes that it is a 30 day "Tourist visa" when all they got is the allowance to enter and stay for 30 days without visa.
One guy even claimed that this was a 30 day "visa-on-arrival".
So lets stop the confusion by telling things for what they are.
^Well, if you want to start a fight for correctness get on over to Wikipedia and change that paragraph and if anyone's got enough time perhaps a glosary of correct visa terminology would put us ahead of the competition
Well before that other thread on VISA, I could never tell the difference. Now I understand that difference. It was explained nicely and simply.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)