Thread: Any doubts about Climate Change?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

The Goreacle is back in the news declaring that a guy named Markey running for Senate should be blessed by G_D for pushing this global warming hoax:

"As Democratic Senate candidate Edward Markey was debating Republican Gabriel Gomez in Springfield on Tuesday night, Vice President Joe Biden and former vice president Al Gore, both Democrats, raised around $250,000 for Markey in Washington, D.C., a Markey aide said. [...]

Gore, a passionate advocate for addressing climate change, said of Markey, “He is the only member of Congress to write legislation to fight global warming that passed either the House or the Senate – God bless him for that!"

Joe Biden, Al Gore raise $250,000 for Ed Markey in D.C. fundraiser | masslive.com

Sorta don't think G_D is gonna bless a pro-abortion fanatic...

Great news that we have another candidate who acknowledges the dangers of man made climate change and takes seriously the threat of global warming.

Pseudo-troll and Boontard and the rest of the head in the sand denialists will go down in history as pitifully ignorant and completely detached from reality.


BTW, since when is pro-choice, pro-abortion? Gotta love GOP logic: protect the fetus, but once it's born, deny the kid health care, safe food, a clean environment and education. WTF to that!

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

pro-choice, pro-abortion?

indeed - and that is the kind of nonsense you come out with, isn't it hotshot?

criticise Hillary = misogynist, criticise obama = racist; criticise Israel = anti-Semitic.

Anyway, why not post up some more posters and cut and paste efforts here top gun. That will sway everyone to buy into the same lies that you have.



Never discuss the pertinent points, just chuck up cut an dpaste efforts and posters, ignore anything else and goes straight to Goricle BS and posts it up. It's almost as if you were more than a little http://www.asianconnection71.com/loco.gif

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

pro-choice, pro-abortion?

indeed - and that is the kind of nonsense you come out with, isn't it hotshot?

So in your strange little world Pro-choice is Pro-abortion?! WTF to that!

Robert Redford speaks the truth: It's much better to spend resources investing in ourselves than killing people on the other side of the world.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

So in your strange little world Pro-choice is Pro-abortion?! WTF to that!

Yet more lies and stretching of the truth from our resident bullshit artist. Where did you cut and paste this from?

What a brainless nerk like you can not comprehend that some are quite capable of thinking for themselves and do not have to copy everything from their man crush politician.

My stance on abortion? Who the fuck are you to tell a woman what to do with her body. My stance on climate scam? Who the fuck are you to tell me I have to pay carbon tax when all it does is fill in short fall from the banks you bailed out and the inflation caused by allowing bankers to create money from thin air.

besides, you have not proven anything other than the fact that if you control the media, you control what 90% of the world thinks about a subject. +

Oh, and because yo love a cut and paste of a lovely poster, here is one just for you.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

So in your strange little world Pro-choice is Pro-abortion?! WTF to that!

Yet more lies and stretching of the truth from our resident bullshit artist.

Way to dodge the question hotshot. You wouldn't want to hurt your butt buddy Boontard's wee little feelings, eh?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

pro-choice, pro-abortion?

indeed

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

hotshot.

Immiation, contrary to popular belief, is not the best form of flattery. Now get off your knees and learn to read before you type your typical loads of poop.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

My stance on abortion? Who the fuck are you to tell a woman what to do with her body

I thought I phrased my pro choice stance rather eloquently. Guess you missed it, or you could not find a cut and paste to respond to it?

Is that right, hotshot?


Anyway - how did tony boy do in keeping on topic?


Not good. Who gets the carbon tax money, hotshot? Who pays for the 33,000 climate scam scholars, hotshot?

Originally Posted by GR3

Oh come on catch up, do you not realise that as we all sit here shivering through yet another freezing European summer with rain instead of the much hyped global desert and runaway rising temratures that the man made global warmists have discretly changed the name from global warming to climate change so they can hedge their bets and claim victory should the weather not stay exactly the same?

Summer begins on June 21th, so I suggest to wait with the judgement. For the heavy rain, and before that snowfall, it wouldn't be possible if it weren't warmer somewhere else and this propels more water in the athmosphere. More precipitation was forecast in the global warming models, and more severe events. Here they are, make the connection.

Here's a pic of the gigantic cat 3 hurricane that spanned the North Atlantic in late March till April, caused by sea water 3 degrees warmer than usual. Maybe the largest storm ever, and it just shouldn't happen at this time of the year in the North Atlantic. That's the thing that shovelled lots of snow to Europe in the early spring.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

hotshot.

Immiation, contrary to popular belief, is not the best form of flattery. Now get off your knees and learn to read before you type your typical loads of poop.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

My stance on abortion? Who the fuck are you to tell a woman what to do with her body

I thought I phrased my pro choice stance rather eloquently. Guess you missed it, or you could not find a cut and paste to respond to it?

Is that right, hotshot?


Anyway - how did tony boy do in keeping on topic?


Not good. Who gets the carbon tax money, hotshot? Who pays for the 33,000 climate scam scholars, hotshot?

You sure ask a lot of questions, but so rarely have an answer. And on the rare occasion you actually provide an answer it's invariably something to do with bat shit crazy NWO conspiracy theories, evil Israel or little green men.

So your latest conspiracy is that ~97% of the tens of thousands of climate scientists around the world who agree that anthropogenic climate change is a reality is just some elaborate scam? Is that it?

Originally Posted by Rainfall

Maybe the largest storm ever,

Problem is, you really believe that.

How old is Earth? Yet you want to say that is the largest storm ever? This is how the climate scam works. Someone makes a comment like this, and suddenly it is in a Gore speech, which then gets dumped on the desk of some PhD in Food science who thinks he can get some funding for writing about climate scam instead. So he writes it up with a few projections and models and prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, backed up by the peers also on the same payroll gravy boat, that the worlds largest ever storm was caused by my lawn mower, and if we don't watch out we will get a worlds largest storm every week. This then get's taken up by the politicians who tax us even more.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

You sure ask a lot of questions, but so rarely have an answer. And on the rare occasion you actually provide an answer it's invariably something to do with bat shit crazy NWO conspiracy theories, evil Israel or little green men.

How is Tony boy doing with keeping on topic. Starts with this typical attempt at a slur, dodges a question and posts up a cut and paste again.

On topic or a troll?



Oh and in answer to your question, they don't know it but they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. Try and keep on subject though, troll boy. How is Kansas this time of year Dorothy?



Getting hot - not in the UK though
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...c-8637907.html

UK weather: The coldest spring for 50 years with average temperature of just 6C

The UK is on track for its coldest spring for more than 50 years following another fortnight of below average temperatures, according to provisional figures from the Met Office.

The average temperature for the three spring months of March, April and May is 6C (43F), making it the fifth coldest spring in records dating back for more than a century to 1910, and the chilliest since 1962.

Earlier figures up to mid-May had suggested this spring was on track to be the 6th coldest on record, and the coldest since 1979, but another cooler than average period in the second half of the month has pushed the spring temperatures down.

The main reason for the cold spring was the exceptionally cold March which registered average temperatures of 2.2C (36F), some 3.3C (38F) below the long-term average, making it the coldest March since 1962, the Met Office said.

This May has also had lower than average temperatures at times, and if there is no change once figures for the last three days have been included, it will be the coldest May since 1996.

Spring 2013 bucks the trend of recent years, which has seen eight of the last 10 springs recording warmer than normal seasons, with temperatures above the 7.7C (46F) long-term average.

All UK regions saw colder than average temperatures this year, with England and Wales experiencing their coldest spring since 1962 and Scotland and Northern Ireland registering the coolest spring since 1979.

The Met Office said: "The colder than average conditions have been caused by different weather patterns at certain times, but generally this season has seen frequent easterly and northerly winds which have brought cold air to the UK from polar and northern European regions."

The season is also on track to be drier than normal, but not as dry as the springs of 2010 and 2011 which contributed to drought conditions earlier in 2012, before deluges led to flooding.

But May is already wetter than average for the month, having notched up 86mm of rainfall up to March 28, compared to an average of 70mm, the provisional figures from the Met Office revealed.

Is there any point in arguing with people who have no grasp of reality?

^ heh hotshot - how is that keeping on topic? You never argue or debate anything. All you do is post up obama-isms or Gore print outs and claim some kind of victory? On a web forum? lol Sooo funny. Why don't you phone ya mumma - she will bail you out of the deep water you keep getting yourself in, or tell you not to play with the mean more mature boys.

Mean while, how is tony troll doing with posting on topic?



Anyway - more morons being scammed by this - those clever Chinese are cleaning up...


Who Is Fooling Whom When It Comes to Combating Climate Change?

Chinese firm creates loads more refrigerant gasses than needed because they will get paid shed loads to destroy it under the climate scam system.
lol

Ya gotta love the head-in-the-sand climate change denialists who love to cherry pick the data and ignore the big picture.

A cold spring in one place on the planet must mean global warming is a hoax, right?


What kind of simpleton falls for such a silly argument?

Empirical measurements of the Earth's heat content show the planet is accumulating heat and global warming is happening.

Figure 1: Total Earth Heat Content from 1962 to 2008 (Church et al 2011).

^ Can any denialists provide any empirical evidence to contradict this fact?

Can you tell me what the correct temperature of the earth is, and why there was an ice age, and when the earth temp will peak again and we will fall back into an ice age?

OR will you just post up pretty pictures that prove nothing except to the brainless drones such as yourself?

Why is it so hard for you bluffers to get? The earth gets warmer. And? So what? You trying to tell us that there were no crops on greenland? That the ice age did not happen?

inconvenient truths indeed.

According to Pseudo-troll it must just be an evil conspiracy by the New World Order, Israel and the Little Green Men, eh?

NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries

Earth has been growing warmer for more than fifty years

NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

According to Pseudo-troll it must just be an evil conspiracy by the New World Order, Israel and the Little Green Men, eh?

On target again? Or drifted off to his slurs and make believe world followed by a pretty picture.


You fricking pathetic Tony, lad, all you are is a regurgitator. If the fashionable lib wank mags told you that having wood furniture caused cancer, you would post page after page of pics about it, sat on your wooden chair and desk just as you preach about climate scam but your hobby is burning fuel in a combustion engine of the sort that is one of the most polluting. *

Hypocrite.

You bring nothing to this debate. Wake me up when you finally have soemthing to say, Mr Fail.



*This part is on topic, mods, if you happen to be watching....

Originally Posted by pseudolus

The earth gets warmer. And? So what? You trying to tell us that there were no crops on greenland?

You either don't read very well or you just enjoy being a simpleton.

You don't think man-made climate change is bad for the human race?

Need some examples?
Higher Temperatures

Changing Landscapes

Wildlife at Risk

Rising Seas

Increased Risk of Drought, Fire and Floods

Stronger Storms and Increased Storm Damage

More Heat-Related Illness and Disease

Economic Losses

Source: http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives...acts/index.htm

nature.org

You really can not help being a big weeping bucket of fail, can you. In fact, you are the excrement of fail, you fail so much.

washingtonpost.com: The Nature Conservancy

Get lost, tony, until you have something of merit to say or add.



You use a source which is more proof of climate scam and the elite making stacks of money from climate scam than actually proves anything. To the boys from nature.org, climate scam is a way for them to get lots of park land to build their houses on, dilbert lol . Soooooooooo fumy. FAIL.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

nature.org

You really can not help being a big weeping bucket of fail, can you. In fact, you are the excrement of fail, you fail so much.

washingtonpost.com: The Nature Conservancy

Get lost, tony, until you have something of merit to say or add.



You use a source which is more proof of climate scam and the elite making stacks of money from climate scam than actually proves anything. To the boys from nature.org, climate scam is a way for them to get lots of park land to build their houses on, dilbert lol . Soooooooooo fumy. FAIL.

You have some beef with nature.org or the nature conservancy? Why? Are they part of your tinfoil hat NWO conspracy theory? Perhaps fronts for the Israeli ADL? Or they're run by little green men?

No proof of a climate scam, but clear evidence of your paranoia and delusion.

Don't you realize you're just being played?

Who funds climate change denialism? It should come as no surprise that Climate Change denialism is funded by those most responsible for the problem and who stand to gain the most from inaction.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

washingtonpost.com: The Nature Conservancy

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

You have some beef with nature.org or the nature conservancy? Why? Are they part of your tinfoil hat NWO conspracy theory? Perhaps fronts for the Israeli ADL? Or they're run by little green men?

Hmm so the washington post are not a zionist wank rag after all? interesting?

read the articles, fail boy. Nature.org boys used conservation to buy up loads of lovely places, and then sold them to their trustees (the elite of te USA) for them to build on, at a huge loss of course.

Anyway - wh am I being played by? Who is giving me money? How am I profiting? Is it cool to disbelieve all the BS you think is true?

No help for loonies like you. However, you kept a little on topic despite your typical BS and cut an pastes and refusal to read anything, and just post gore garbage.

On topic or troll this time?

Let's be clear who is obstructing progress on combating Climate Change in the US:


Who is funding those GOP denialists? Those who have the most to lose of course.

And then you have the head-in-the-sand denialists like Pseudo-troll who simply deny reality, one fact at a time.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Robert Redford speaks the truth: It's much better to spend resources investing in ourselves than killing people on the other side of the world.

55555. Even Robert Redford recognizes the danger and suggests money should be spent on the protection of our planet. Now why don't the politicians, bankers and corporates think that? Hmmm, let me guess!