Thread: Derek Chauvin Murder Trial

Originally Posted by Slick

Yes, that’s clearly the most logical conclusion.

And the reason for that is quite a logical conclusion as well.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

And the reason for that is quite a logical conclusion as well.

Do not worry. It is too early yet for his masters to provide new talking points. Once he is reprogrammed he will have a response.

Originally Posted by Troy

Mind you, the guy is still guilty of using excessive force.

Slick is right - he also received commendations.

However he's on video causing the death of a man, completely unnecessarily.

No need to act like he's interviewing for a job or something.

But we need to suppress voting rights because....

... The orange moron lost...

... Those uppity niggers need to be locked down. So lets bottleneck their voting places and make sure they can not get food and water. If they dare to oppose their white overlords by standing in line to try and vote.

The next step is to bring out the horses and whips.

Originally Posted by bsnub

But we need to suppress voting rights because....

... The orange moron lost...

... Those uppity niggers need to be locked down. So lets bottleneck their voting places and make sure they can not get food and water. If they dare to oppose their white overlords by standing in line to try and vote.

The next step is to bring out the horses and whips.

Did snub just drop an N bomb ?

Originally Posted by Slick

You just know that the satire is entirely lost on someone like Slick.

Dunno if all of this is true or not but the point sure as hell is:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Dunno if all of this is true or not but the point sure as hell is:

While I understand the point, I really do not agree. The guy is on trial for THIS murder, and it has to be proved on this murder. Even a significant past history does not mean he is guilty in THIS instance.

(..and to be clear, in this case I think he is as guilty as all get out).

Originally Posted by nidhogg

Even a significant past history does not mean he is guilty in THIS instance.

Correct, exactly as much as the victim's past record means nothing to do with what happened in this case also...

Originally Posted by nidhogg

Even a significant past history does not mean he is guilty in THIS instance.

I agree but there's a familiar pattern here.

Google 'George Floyd' or 'Trayvon Martin' etc. and the immediate reaction from some quarters is to push the 'Angry Black Man' / thug narrative where every little indiscretion in their lives is amplified, even with 12 year old Tamir Rice, like even simply looking like a gangster because you were wearing a hood is somehow deserving of a death sentence.

Originally Posted by TheRealKW

Correct, exactly as much as the victim's past record means nothing to do with what happened in this case also...

Yup.

It is without doubt George Floyd was a criminal with many charges finalised and some pending against him including the final accusation of passing counterfeit money.

Whilst the man was a scourge on society and heading nowhere towards a proper legal lifestyle he did not deserve what he received from that pompous, hate filled person employed to protect him and everyone else.

Finish this crap and jail the murderous fuker for life. This verdict will give him and others with similar intentions a long time to consider what is right and wrong.

^ As a footnote any compensation money awarded Floyd's family should be distributed to the innocent people Floyd assaulted and criminally compromised.

He obviously was living on the edge and probably would have been eventually topped by another medium because he was a cvnt!

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Google 'George Floyd' or 'Trayvon Martin' etc. and the immediate reaction from some quarters is to push the 'Angry Black Man' / thug narrative where every little indiscretion in their lives is amplified, even with 12 year old Tamir Rice, like even simply looking like a gangster because you were wearing a hood is somehow deserving of a death sentence.

Man, you are so off base on all of these cases it’s crazy. You are literally and specifically part of the problem, totally incapable of putting your personal vendettas and opinions aside and looking at each case objectively.

Unfortunately, there’s a large amount of people just like you who stand around ready to fan the flames, and all it does is cause more chaos.

Originally Posted by Slick

You are literally

You overuse that word and in the incorrect contexts, literally.

Originally Posted by Slick

totally incapable of putting your personal vendettas and opinions aside and looking at each case objectively.

OK angry little racist man.

Get back to me when you have an understanding of irony and your own countries laws and Constitution.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

OK angry little racist man.

Tamir Rice got dead because he was walking towards armed cops with a fake gun that looked just like a real one, not because he was wearing a hood. Why do you always lie.

l.t.

He obviously was living on the edge and probably would have been eventually topped by another medium because he was a cvnt!

indeed. according to the coroners report ....

Signed by Dr. Andrew M. Baker, it says Floyd had tested positive for the novel coronavirus on April 3. A post-mortem nasal swab confirmed that diagnosis. The report notes that because a positive result for coronavirus can persist for weeks after the disease has resolved, "the result most likely reflects asymptomatic but persistent ... positivity from previous infection."

In addition to fentanyl and methamphetamine, the toxicology report from the autopsy showed that Floyd also had cannabinoids in his system when he died.

Floyd also had heart disease, hypertension and sickle cell trait — a mostly asymptomatic form of the more serious sickle cell disease, an inherited blood disorder that primarily affects African Americans.

.... the non mask wearing covid+ obese waste of space was not long for this life anyway. overdose, heart attack, stroke all waiting in the shadows.

pity that the dumb cops actions have given half the worlds activists something to hang their hats on.

Originally Posted by sabang

^ So all of the complaints from Black people were summarily dismissed? Figures.

According to Minneapolis PD, the complaints that did not result in disciplinary action are not required to be made public. However, Wayne Reyes was white and would have been one of those reports.

Very few here seem to be taking the case objectively.

I notice the MPD are distancing themselves from the restraining method used by Chauvin. It was allowed but was it properly trained and did Chauvin know the dangers of applying such a technique.

Originally Posted by Slick

Tamir Rice got dead because he was walking towards armed cops with a fake gun that looked just like a real one, not because he was wearing a hood. Why do you always lie.

Google 'George Floyd' or 'Trayvon Martin' etc. and the immediate reaction from some quarters is to push the 'Angry Black Man' / thug narrative where every little indiscretion in their lives is amplified, even with 12 year old Tamir Rice, like even simply looking like a gangster because you were wearing a hood is somehow deserving of a death sentence.

Where's the lie?

Tamir Rice was 12 years old and was shot dead for playing with a toy gun that had an orange tipped-barrel to indicate it was a replica--you know, 'cos he was a kid--by a man almost immediately after he'd arrived on the seen who had 'been deemed an emotionally unstable recruit and unfit for duty'.

So kinda like you with your silly melodramatics, threatening other posters with violence, and generally accusing others of exactly what you do, you silly little angry dwarf.

Originally Posted by Slick

Tamir Rice got dead because he was walking towards armed cops with a fake gun that looked just like a real one, not because he was wearing a hood. Why do you always lie.

In my opinion they did shoot too quickly, a shot in the leg or air could have been sufficient.
The age and looks can fool you. I'm sure R. Kelly won't disagree

Prosecutors Show Tamir Rice'''s Play Gun, and Real Gun

According to a 2016 GQ article about the case, the toy gun in question was an Airsoft pellet gun, which Rice got from a friend. His friend's dad had purchased the gun, a replica of a Colt M1911 semi-automatic, from Walmart. The Airsoft pellet gun typically has an orange tip on the barrel, but Rice's friend took the toy gun apart to fix it at some point when it wasn't working, and was unable to get the the orange piece back on.
This Is The Toy Gun That Got Tamir Rice Killed 3 Years Ago Today

Originally Posted by Backspin

Cops are supposed to shoot to kill. That's what they train for.

Originally Posted by Backspin

So cops should be able to blow legs off in these situations.

As per usual, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Cops (or soldiers et al) are taught to shoot at the centre of mass, not to kill. It's incredibably hard to shoot a limb, let alone shoot a leg off.