Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by Humbert

What on earth are you talking about? What behaviors have you illustrated?

The arrogant, elitist attitude that you exhibit. The same as Obama in his remarks re bitter clingers only with you it's Honey Boo Boo aficionados.

Maybe its a case of projection on your part. Feelings of inadequacy and inferiority.
But since you bring it up, please don't let me keep you from your adoration of Honey Boo Boo. I think you are right in her target group.

I recall sitting in a bar Soi 11 in 2007 and chatting with this american bloke about who should get the Dem nomination. My view point then was that life is a bitch, no point voting for one. I haven't changed my opinion either. She gets a sympathy vote from some people because they believe she was wronged by Bill. She gets the Woman vote from women. She gets the faghag vote from the gay community. She gets the Milf chasers vote like humberts (lol, couldn't resist). But she changes her mind like the seasons on most policies (barring her old clients Monsanto of course) .

At least everyone knew Dubya was a lying piece of crud. The danger with this piece of skirt is that most people refuse to believe is, most likely due to her Victim status.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

At least everyone knew Dubya was a lying piece of crud. The danger with this piece of skirt is that most people refuse to believe is, most likely due to her Victim status.

That's my point besides she's infinitely more dishonest than Dubya ever though of being. Remember, W. thought G_D was directing him to slay the evil-doers. With HRC, it's stab 'em in the back dishonesty 101.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by pseudolus

At least everyone knew Dubya was a lying piece of crud. The danger with this piece of skirt is that most people refuse to believe is, most likely due to her Victim status.

That's my point besides she's infinitely more dishonest than Dubya ever though of being. Remember, W. thought G_D was directing him to slay the evil-doers. With HRC, it's stab 'em in the back dishonesty 101.

Now I know you're taking the piss. Hillary Clinton as dishonest as George W Bush?!

George W, the most unpopular President in the history of the United States?(Source: Poll: More disapprove of Bush than any other president - CNN.com)

Have you conveniently forgotten how George W lied us into war with Iraq?!


GW Bush lied through his teeth to make the case for war with Iraq. Where are those WMD's and the link between Saddam Hussein and terrorism? They don't exist. There was never a legitimate reason to invade Iraq.

The other lie that will tarnish GW and the United States for years to come is the lie that he had a legitimate reason to torture detainees.

Trying to compare Clinton and Bush on honesty... What a laugh! Except it isn't funny, not one bit.

Stay tuned for the next exciting episode of fostergate.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

The other lie that will tarnish GW and the United States for years to come is the lie that he had a legitimate reason to torture detainees.

far too much truth in that statement

Originally Posted by Mid

far too much truth in that statement

Yep - would never happen under Saint Obama's watch.

US Muslim sues FBI over ?months of torture on unspecified charges? ? RT USA
U.S. Ordered Torture of Man Held in Detention in UAE, Lawsuit Alleges - Hit & Run : Reason.com
Headlines for May 31, 2013 | Democracy Now!
Track the CIA's Secret Rendition Flights with a New Interactive Map | Motherboard

Ohh wait a minute. Sorry, I have got it all wrong because there is no such thing as torture as regards to the USA anymore. It has been renamed "advanced interrogation techniques" and rendition is now called "Acclimatization treatment". Well thats jolly good. I wonder when a drone strike will be renamed "A Handshake for Freedom".

Hillary Clinton ahead in 2016 presidential race poll

"In an early look at the 2016 presidential campaign, a new poll shows former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton comfortably ahead of Republicans Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.
"
Source: Hillary Clinton ahead in 2016 presidential race poll - Washington Times

Originally Posted by Mid

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

The other lie that will tarnish GW and the United States for years to come is the lie that he had a legitimate reason to torture detainees.

far too much truth in that statement

Right.

And KSM wouldn't have spilled the beans unless he was subjected to Madonna's Hits 24/7 either we are to assume?

Originally Posted by barbaro

Chris Cristie is a moderate and had his lap band surgery. Possible for run and nomination, but of course, a lot of water is to go under the bridge.

He would have been better off keeping the bulge - more in tune with the voters, and the op kind of sends the wrong message.

Anyway, reckon Bush will get the nomination because his name will be enough to hand it to Hillary. Rand Paul I suspect will be the 2020 victor though by the way he his shaping up and quietly cutting his allegiances to his dad and swapping them over to the king makers.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by barbaro

Chris Cristie is a moderate and had his lap band surgery. Possible for run and nomination, but of course, a lot of water is to go under the bridge.

He would have been better off keeping the bulge - more in tune with the voters, and the op kind of sends the wrong message.

Anyway, reckon Bush will get the nomination because his name will be enough to hand it to Hillary. Rand Paul I suspect will be the 2020 victor though by the way he his shaping up and quietly cutting his allegiances to his dad and swapping them over to the king makers.

Rand Paul in 2020?

The Tea Party Republican is more racist than his dad, has no appeal among African American, Asian and Hispanic voters, and he's a conspiracy nut (Amero and the "NAFTA superhighway").

Paul is so far to the right ideologically that I can't imagine he'd have a realistic chance...

Remember his disastrous appearance at Howard University a while back?

Rand Paul's flippant "accidents happen" comment regarding the BP oil spill?

You don't win the national election by appealing to the lunatic fringe. He'd have to seriously reinvent himself and the GOP if he ever wants a shot at the White House.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

You don't win the national election by appealing to the lunatic fringe. He'd have to seriously reinvent himself and the GOP if he ever wants a shot at the White House.

Michelle Bachman may be preaching her sermons in the Big House by then, but Rand Paul and Sarah Palin would make nice running mates, dontcha think.

A fantastic quote from Hillary Clinton that so clearly defines the difference between the political parties in America-

As recognized, it's still a long way to the possible nomination of HRC although, if the present trend continues, she's DOA:

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s favorability rating has dropped over the past few months, a new poll found.

The Bloomberg News poll conducted by Selzer and Co. found that Clinton’s popularity has dropped from 70 percent in December to 58 percent.

The percentage of people who have an unfavorable view of Clinton has increased, the poll also found. In December, 11 percent of those surveyed said they had an unfavorable view of Clinton. Now, 22 percent say they have an unfavorable view of the former secretary of State."

Poll: Hillary Clinton's favorability dips - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

Poll: Pennsylvania voters prefer Hillary Clinton over Paul, Santorum in potential 2016 matchups

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton holds double digit leads in Pennsylvania over two Republicans in possible 2016 presidential races"

"Clinton, a 2008 Democratic presidential candidate who also served as New York's junior U.S. senator from 2001 to 2009, leads former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., 53 to 36 percent in his home state. She also leads U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., 52 to 37 percent in Pennsylvania."

Poll: Pennsylvania voters prefer Hillary Clinton over Paul, Santorum in potential 2016 matchups

^

the fact that rick santorum, and rand paul are the republicans that polling agencies are putting up against HRC speaks volumes about the dearth of legitimate candidates the GOP is capable of fielding

neither of these guys has any chance of winning a national election.

christ, rick santorum lost his senate race by 17 points.

Originally Posted by raycarey

^

the fact that rick santorum, and rand paul are the republicans that polling agencies are putting up against HRC speaks volumes about the dearth of legitimate candidates the GOP is capable of fielding

neither of these guys has any chance of winning a national election.

christ, rick santorum lost his senate race by 17 points.

Doesn't matter what candidates they field. Their policies are the problem.

They simply want to take money off the great unwashed and give it to themselves and their friends, and they cannot make the numbers add up any other way.

Mrs. Clinton opened a Twitter account today: https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton

She seems popular with 110,000 followers, by 3pm.

Anyone who believes HRC is presidential material belongs in an insane asylum.
Ambassador Who Ran off to Have Sex With Minor Children ID'd as Major Obama Bundler & Political Appointee;
Hillary's Lawyer Cheryl Mills Once Again Stepped In to "Fix" Matters

Just another coverup with Hillary, Patrick Kennedy, and Cheryl Mills conspiring at the center.

Yesterday, CBS News published documents that showed the State Department had quashed or obstructed Inspector General investigations into serious wrongdoing by high-ranking officials, including one Ambassador who ditched his security team to importune prostitutes in public parks. Today, that story gets more sordid in NBC’s follow-up, which shows that investigators suspected the same Ambassador of targeting minor children Meanwhile, the State Department calls allegations of obstruction and interference “preposterous”.

The New York Post will take all the scoops the media deliberately gives up.

A State Department whistleblower has accused high-ranking staff of a massive coverup — including keeping a lid on findings that members of then-Secretary Hillary Clinton’s security detail and the Belgian ambassador solicited prostitutes. A chief investigator for the agency’s inspector general wrote a memo outlining eight cases that were derailed by senior officials, including one instance of interference by Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills.
...
A DS agent was called off a case against US Ambassador to Belgium Howard Gutman over claims that he solicited prostitutes, including minors."
Another day, another Scandal...where will it end?

and to bring Mrs. Clinton's twitter account up to date,.......

In less than 48 hours hours she has over 426,000 followers. That does seem popular

I do find it weird that people are celebrating the fact that the results of their "democratic" elections have been decided for them 4 years in advance.

If I was a Merkin, I would be hoping for Iran to invade and bring regime change. At least then there would be a slight outside chance that each vote would count for something.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

I do find it weird that people are celebrating the fact that the results of their "democratic" elections have been decided for them 4 years in advance.

If I was a Merkin, I would be hoping for Iran to invade and bring regime change. At least then there would be a slight outside chance that each vote would count for something.

Well, getting some bright stars like Ted Cruz into the Senate bodes some ray of positive light. More on the way we hope!