^
Saw that movie a few days ago. Two Thumbs up from me. :tumbs: :tumbs:
Printable View
^
Saw that movie a few days ago. Two Thumbs up from me. :tumbs: :tumbs:
Why would solid metal suddenly behave like semi liquid on impact regardless of the speed?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
This has to be one of the stupidest things ever read on the internet. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
:mid:
:smileylaughing:
The higher the speed the more impact damage.
Because in between valving sessions, LD loves to watch Terminator 2 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Koojo
Ah, I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
Funny how this cognitive dissonance prevents the truthers watching the documentary I suggested ages ago, yet they all think I should watch yet another one of their hilarious conspiracy documentaries full of dramatic music.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
They can't even see past their own obsessions.
:rofl:
Instead of posting one line questions, why don't you actually watch some of the videos and many many explanations?Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoWhy would solid metal suddenly behave like semi liquid on impact regardless of the speed?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTThis has to be one of the stupidest things ever read on the internet. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
:mid:
:smileylaughing:
The higher the speed the more impact damage.
Because they're irrelevant bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom SawyerInstead of posting one line questions, why don't you actually watch some of the videos and many many explanations?Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoWhy would solid metal suddenly behave like semi liquid on impact regardless of the speed?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTThis has to be one of the stupidest things ever read on the internet. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
:mid:
:smileylaughing:
The higher the speed the more impact damage.
From harry's post
"Funny how this cognitive dissonance prevents the truthers watching the documentary I suggested ages ago, yet they all think I should watch yet another one of their hilarious conspiracy documentaries full of dramatic music.
They can't even see past their own obsessions."
Echos of your mind Halliburton harry?
So by your standard. the only documentary you claim to have "suggested" others watch on the topic is irrelevant bullshit too.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaBecause they're irrelevant bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer
Ya knew yer number when it was called, eh hallburton harry......:mid:
Yesterday 08:27 PM
Tom Sawyer "The double digit IQ crowd"
Yesterday 08:44 PM
Pragmatic "Are you refering to me?"
Yesterday 08:44 PM
Tom Sawyer "No, to ENT's detractors"
Yesterday 09:03 PM harrybarracuda "I'm not his detractor, I'm his shrink."
As fast as that! :)
There are 3 videos in all. I thought each of the three vidoes convincing enough to form an opinion after watch each one. I think you'll come away from watching them a better man Terry. One can live in hope? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by terry57
Well why don't you watch it and decide? At least I've bothered watching the laughable babble you constantly refer to as evidence, which is why I can criticise it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTSo by your standard. the only documentary you claim to have "suggested" others watch on the topic is irrelevant bullshit too.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaBecause they're irrelevant bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer
Then again, I don't suffer from Confirmation Bias like you do.
:chitown:
Stick to bean counting......it's safer for ya harry.
and post a reference to that documentary of yours you're on about.
If you watch the 3 videos mentioned you will find that isn't really fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koojo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gazza
Just to be clear - these are the 3 partsQuote:
Originally Posted by Pragmatic
"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version (1/3) - YouTube
"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version (2/3) - YouTube
"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version (3/3) - YouTube
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Yeah, what documentary Harry? - Re-Post the link.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Is that all ya have harry?
Kinda emotionally loaded stuff,.....sort of.
Tell me harry, are ya gay?
Like hanging out with the "men" and feeling part of the gang and having a few beers and stuff?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Interesting to see that you managed to prove Einstein's theory of relativity somehow by downloading and watching a 52 minute documentary in 27 minutes.
In other words, you haven't watched it. Do you know why?
Yes, you are that predictable.Quote:
CONFIRMATION BIAS
Definition:
The tendency to accept evidence that confirms our beliefs and to reject evidence that contradicts them.
Now take your meds like the good doctor says.
Harry, you are some thick crumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaQuote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Interesting to see that you managed to prove Einstein's theory of relativity somehow by watching a 52 minute documentary in 27 minutes.
In other words, you haven't watched it. Do you know why?
Yes, you are that predictable.Quote:
CONFIRMATION BIAS
Definition:
The tendency to accept evidence that confirms our beliefs and to reject evidence that contradicts them.
Now take your meds like the good doctor says.
The documentary you posted, post # 3541, (Smithsonian 911 Stories In Fragments a hero's badge) is 3 minutes and 45 seconds or so long.
I watched it and gave my opinion on it.
I think you are losing your marbles and need to take a pill. :mid:
Sorry, I didn't realise you were that fucking thick.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTHarry, you are some thick crumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaQuote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Interesting to see that you managed to prove Einstein's theory of relativity somehow by watching a 52 minute documentary in 27 minutes.
In other words, you haven't watched it. Do you know why?
Yes, you are that predictable.Quote:
CONFIRMATION BIAS
Definition:
The tendency to accept evidence that confirms our beliefs and to reject evidence that contradicts them.
Now take your meds like the good doctor says.
The documentary you posted, post # (Smithsonian 911 Stories In Fragments x264 720p AC3 HDTV (download torrent) - TPB) is 3 minutes and 45 seconds or so long.
I watched it and gave my opinion on it.
I think you need to take a pill. :mid:
The LINK is the documentary.
The Youtube snippet is just that, a snippet.
Perhaps I need to change your meds.
If you can't get to PirateBay, it's also
here
Tried downloading this link, but no go so far.
Smithsonian 911 Stories In Fragments x264 720p AC3 HDTV (download torrent) - TPB
And another one:
102 Minutes - The Attack on WTC, Part 1 - HD Version - YouTube
102 Minutes - The Attack on WTC, Part 2 - HD Version - YouTube
Man those planes look just like unmanned drones don't they.
Nope, tried all three links, no movie going on, only adds for gambling, download your docco, but nope, no torrent, no nothing happening.
Maybe ya could try something less impressive.
Still watching the last two docos you posted, but so far, no, I see aircraft, but not necessarily airliners flying at the towers, there's nothing different from any of the previous docos of the aircraft posted throughout this thread.
The big one flying into the second tower, supposedly flight 175, still looks dodgy, and still morphs into the tower on impact and still looks like more than an airliner exiting the tower.