Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by beazalbob69
On the contrary....if you look through the past threads on this subject, you will see that we who you quaintly refer to as 'sheeple" have debated most rationally and analyzed extensively in a most logical fashion.
Whereas ENT's mind has flapped about everywhere whilst he parrots other peoples' theories, and Albert goes along for the ride without even rationally debating.
I can offer alternative possibilities.Quote:
Originally Posted by beazalbob69
Rolf Harris blew up Building 7 because one of the people who worked there was about to expose him.
How's that, alternative and possible enough for you?
https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif
The shills are clasping onto straws now :)Quote:
Originally Posted by beazalbob69
and never forget how linked this all is with the 2007/2008 crash which financially enslaved several generations.
Overdose: The Next Financial Crisis - YouTube
For some if they dont see it, it doesnt exist. For others if they dont see it, it might still be possible. I happen to be in the latter group.
To me anyone with unshakable beliefs is wrong plain and simple. Most people know nothing.
Imagine, how lucky the owner (tenant?) of WTC was, old man Silverstein. Normally, he had never missed a day, not to have a breakfast in his office on x-th floor.
But that very day it had happened he had appointment at the dentist, where his daughter accompanied him to. How lucky the two of them.
And how lucky he was when few weeks ago he insured the shabby towers at his pal Greenberg's kind company AIG. Unfortunately, all the accounting cooked books had burned down in Tower No. 7, (not so well fireproof as the passports of the terrorosts). Fortunately, the fuchs Silverstein had kept the contract papers not in his office.
How lucky.
Now they're even arguing with each other, very entertaining that... :chitown: :bananaman:Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert ShagnastierNo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterflycorrection, 911 was an Israeli job, which makes it an inside job as the Pentagon is dominated by IsraelQuote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
There were Israelis involved in it - no question (wolfawitz for one)
However, Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheyney were key players.
They aren't Israeli or Jewish.
The Pakistani ISI was most likely also involved, as were rogue elements of the Saudi Government.
We're looking at a global gang here crossing all countries and religions
Not a chance with these nut cases Patsy, nice sentiment though.Quote:
Originally Posted by patsycat
In this statement you're presumably referring to those of you ilk, nut job conspiracy theorists here? :chitown:Quote:
Originally Posted by beazalbob69
A lot of both lucky and unlucky people that day, my sister in law was one of the lucky ones too, having been late for work. I'm guessing she must have been part of the conspiracy too. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2014/09/960.jpg
So glade everybody had a great day.
No doubt she was. The cast of people involved in this government conspiracy must have been in the hundreds of thousands.....and not a single leak. This from the same government that can't massage the unemployment numbers without getting found out in 48 hours....:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaBornA lot of both lucky and unlucky people that day, my sister in law was one of the lucky ones too, having been late for work. I'm guessing she must have been part of the conspiracy too. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Klondyke
Then we have all the myths and made up bullshit to suit the "insider" theory....as seen in the little snippet above....where every single statement is factually incorrect apart from Silverstein missing attendance at the WTC that morning....which was not an unusual event at all, but can be turned into one for the purposes of spouting bullshit.....:rolleyes:
I am referring to anyone and everyone regardless of what side they fall on. Even you nutjob official line believers.:bananaman:Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaBorn
Quite :chitown:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
https://teakdoor.com/Gallery/albums/u...thermite~0.jpg
https://teakdoor.com/Gallery/albums/u...o-cut-beam.jpg
https://teakdoor.com/Gallery/albums/u...tagon-hole.jpg
https://teakdoor.com/Gallery/albums/u...e-close-up.jpg
^ Not much room for an airliner to slide in there and disappear, eh?
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2014/09/944.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
:[/QUOTE]
Nothing like the WTC 100 floor towers nor WTC 7.
The pics you posted are of a five story apartment building in Texas, which was still under construction and covered in plastic, filled with timber, nothing like the aluminium clad steel and concrete WTC towers,....but at the time. It burnt down due to a fire started by welding equipment, all in a high wind, a wind so strong that the water from the fire hoses couldn't reach it effectively.
Now what's the next rabbit you wanna pull out of your a*se?
Now, once more;
Tell us what that bit of Boeing wing was doing jammed between the Muslim centre and a neighbouring building near WTC New York?
Still not identified eh?
Stupid secret service of USA left the fwkn thing behind when they were cleaning up the stage props used in the WTC debacle.
Airliner crashes, my foot. :smileylaughing:
So "No building in history has ever collapsed due to fire" suddenly becomes "except for ones not in New York City next to the World Trade centre".
Monty Python - What have the romans ever done for us - YouTube
In any case, the proximate cause of the building 7 collapse was not fire...that's another one of the misstatements/myths that the conspiracy fanatics cling to. The fire was a contributing factor, but the collapse began as a result of extensive damage to the lower level (so called soft story) by debris and additional fires.
The way all of the WTC buildings collapsed in their own footprint was because of the particular nature of the structures. In a densely populated place like lower Manhatten, you want collapsing buildings (from whatever cause) to go straight down instead of falling into other buildings and destroying the whole area around them.....so they are designed and built that way.
It's been explained to death over the years, but the TD enlightened ones just keep ignoring anything beyond their own bullshit and nonsense... while referring to everyone else as sheep. Truth is, they make the average sheep seem quite intelligent by comparison......:rolleyes:
https://teakdoor.com/Gallery/albums/u...ermite%7E0.jpg
https://teakdoor.com/Gallery/albums/u...o-cut-beam.jpg
I'd love to hear one of you flat earthers explain this.
No chance though.
:rofl:
That looks like a fireman talking on a walkie-talkie....what did you think it was?.....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
So that's a no from Koman then
:chitown:
Not at all....I'm quite certain that photo shows a NY firefighter talking on a walkie-talkie---or something of the sort....:chitown: Do you not agree?Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
Thanks, Koman. It's a relief to hear a voice of reason amongst the clamourings of loonies like ENT.Quote:
Originally Posted by koman
And Albert....you twit....the firemen cut those beams with oxy acetylene torches to remove the unstable and very dangerous mass of twisted beams sprouting up. Not only have they stated this, but anyone who has used an oxy torch to cut thick metal can see the characteristic cut. The photos were probably taken the next day, or even much later.
Why do you even bother posting crap like this ? It severely detracts from the real story and real culprits.....like those 28 pages of withheld documents mentioned in the other thread : https://teakdoor.com/world-news/14596...e-history.html
"Ahhhh I remember this one well....being that I am in the precision metal trade and know quite a bit about steel columns and how they are cut, and the characteristics that go with that...I will say that with 100% assurance, that was not cut with a torch, in fact, it is impossible to make a cut like that with a torch, or any other hand held instrument.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
That I am sure of."
"I, too, have many years(25) of mfg./fab. experience in the aerospace industry, and know this isn't a man made cut. Oxy-acet. torches do not leave slag, and there is absolutely no reason to make a diag. cut. It takes twice as long, and is potentially dangerous as the column could easily slip given any lateral pressure placed on the beam."
Do you have any support to back up your ideas LD?
And LD, feel free to give us your hysterical take on the pentagon shot that involves vaporizing wings and vaporizing 5 tonne engines
:smileylaughing: