Thread: Caution - British tolerance at work!

Mr Grubs - don't you talk some bollocks at times.

Originally Posted by astasinim

Originally Posted by Mr Gribbs

Most of the muzzies immigrants and first & second generationers came to the UK from countries that were once colonized by the UK. No colonization no muzzies. The UK was also supporting radical muzzies up until the start of 2000. London became a home for many radical muzzies from Algeria, Chechnya, Balkans, Arab world, and Africa. This is blowback.

I dont recall many of those being part of the empire. Talking your usual shite I see.

I concur...WTF?????????

^ Wot he said...

Originally Posted by thegent

Originally Posted by Mr Gribbs

Most of the muzzies immigrants and first & second generationers came to the UK from countries that were once colonized by the UK. No colonization no muzzies. The UK was also supporting radical muzzies up until the start of 2000. London became a home for many radical muzzies from Algeria, Chechnya, Balkans, Arab world, and Africa. This is blowback.

Most of the civilised world plays host to these immigrants, courtesy of the 1951 Convention on Human Rights. Granted, the sub continent has traditionally fed migration to the UK but many have come irrespective of the traditional colonial link. Most did so because of the economic imperative and because their culture and ethniciity were already represented here thus assisting in their integration.

Unfortunately, some of their spawn have to a considerable degree become disaffected from both their host country and their parents whose traditional roots offer no succour. They have become alienated not least because they are minorities in a country which politically has struck a discordant note from an imaginary birth place that only exists in the rhetoric of those seeking to exploit their isolation. In short, they are cheap fodder to be manipulated and in demonstrating their resentment they are simply reinforcing an identity which otherwise has no worth beyond the typical existence of an unemployable, feckless, talentless youth rotting away in a sink estate anywhere in Britain.

Ultimately, their protest will fade like most fashions but in the meantime they should be treated with all the respect their feeble posturing deserves. In social terms that should not be with tolerance, forgiveness and a degree of understanding but with a sound kick to the head with steel capped boots and something unpleasant shoved up their arse.

Frankly, it's their hairyness I find personally disagreeable. So unhygienic.

And what is even more laughable is their expressing a kindred spirit for their Middle Eastern cousins who have historically treated the average Paki and Bangla with nothing other than contemptuous disdain.

You make some fairly good points. I think the younger generation are having an identity crisis. A lot of them don't see themselves as fully British, and they aren't accepted as fully Pakistani by the Pakis back in Pakistan, they are in limbo. I think it also has to do with the liberalization of the West. The West has become so liberal and demoralizing radical forms of religion become more appealing. They don't have the good values their parents possessed, because they were brought up in a society that teaches people are entitled to a whole lot of things just for existing. It is corny how much they kiss the ass of Middle Easterners who see that as useful idiots at best, but Islam teaches that all Muslims are brothers and sisters regardless of ethnicity, buts its not often practiced in the real world. The Arabs have the higher status because Islam is an Arabcentric religion.

The sad truth is that like most of the human race they are non entities but in their adolescence and emotionally retarded state their wretched ego can't accept that. They can't survive anywhere but in the welfare state that they so affect to despise and this realisation surely sticks in their craw as much as their meaningless little lives.

Without their cheap contrived anti westernism they are nothing. It's about time they were reminded of that the next time they infect our streets with their obscenity.

Originally Posted by the gent
Ultimately, their protest will fade like most fashions but in the meantime they should be treated with all the respect their feeble posturing deserves. In social terms that should not be with tolerance, forgiveness and a degree of understanding but with a sound kick to the head with steel capped boots and something unpleasant shoved up their arse.
Frankly, it's their hairyness I find personally disagreeable. So unhygienic.

And what is even more laughable is their expressing a kindred spirit for their Middle Eastern cousins who have historically treated the average Paki and Bangla with nothing other than contemptuous disdain.

It's not really possible to reasonably argue with this gent.

And thanks for the laughs pure genius

I still doubt these people would be in the UK if the British didn't fuck over the Middle East so bad. It was the British who supported the Islamic fundamentalist in Saudi Arabia to overthrow the Ottomans, the British played a major role in the creation of Israel, the British had their troops in Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, Sudan, and a few others. Then you have the British involvement in India, Pakistan, and other parts. Would there have been a problem with Muslims today if these things never happened? I don't know, but it gives them an exscuse to do what they do.....

Originally Posted by raycarey

Originally Posted by keda

Jailed hate preacher Abu Hamza's home has a £40,000 makeover... paid by taxpayers

what? taxpayers are paying for the renovations on a prisoner's house?

that's completely absurd.

so much so that there must be more to this ...especially considering the source(s)...

ahhh....here it is...

Originally Posted by keda

Hamza, 52, never officially lived in the home, which his Moroccan-born wife Najat Chaffe, 49, moved into in 1995 after claiming they had separated.

so, it's not his house.

notice how the daily mail uses 'officially', and 'claiming' because they don't like the facts.....and they also feel obliged to include 'moroccan-born' to stir up even more anti-immigrant sentiment.....and, of course, the usual suspects fall for it....and spread it.

Er, ah, so right you are, scarey me ole fruit, except that the purpose of the house - if you don't mind colliding with the truth, is that your swampmate "claims" to be separated from his wife and brood...only, that is the "official" version since it increases the amount of benefits he and her and their brood can prise from the taxpayer.

And so true also that it isn't his house, which you take great pains to point out though that's actually part of the point of the piece; so notch yourself up another few missing toes. Note the subtle giveaway, "the only council property in the street." Scum like him, and you btw, don't need their own homes when they can rip off the taxpayer and take theirs.


As for this strange bit of moral outrage:

....and they also feel obliged to include 'moroccan-born' to stir up even more anti-immigrant sentiment....

That should work both ways, scarey. I do not recall you protesting when Muslims gang-butcher a schoolkid or senior citizen for not being a Muslim, and the media calls them "Asians". Nor do you protest when your dysfunctional Muslim brothers gang rape a worthless infidel 13 year-old, and the media again refers to them as "Asians".

Why is that, you piece of human garbage? It's because everything works only one way for you lot in your ongoing crimes against decency.

This is why you draw on "anti-immigrant sentiment" as another distraction to show naive pc idiots how fair minded you are, when in reality you mean anti-Muslim sentiment...like you care a toss about non-Muslim immigrants, or any other non-Muslims for that matter. Isn't that true, scarey?

You were bred to be brain dead, and you love it!

Originally Posted by Mr Gribbs

Most of the muzzies immigrants and first & second generationers came to the UK from countries that were once colonized by the UK. No colonization no muzzies. The UK was also supporting radical muzzies up until the start of 2000. London became a home for many radical muzzies from Algeria, Chechnya, Balkans, Arab world, and Africa. This is blowback.

When were Pakistan and Bangla Desh colonised by the Brits; or Algeria, the Balkans and Chechnya for that matter?

If you look at the history of India, which I don't expect you to, Islam has usurped some 40% of that country - through agitation - and turned the spoils into failed Islamic states teeming with high growth rates of dysfunctional people.

The colonisation you refer to is by Islam, as an ongoing trend over 1400 years. If it isn't too painful a truth, Islam was hatched in a town of the Arabian Peninsula, and how do you (or any other blinkered fools) believe it has managed to expand exponentially, if not through colonisation?

There are more Moslems in Indonesia than the Middle East, plus of course you have Moslem Malaysia and the southern Fil's. Islam spread to SE Asia via trade routes, not conquest and colonisation.

does ANYONE believe this?

Originally Posted by keda

About 6 years back at LHR before they organised computers and Brit arrivals just walked through showing their passport, I was singled out by a Paki on the station who held his arm out to stop me as he scrutinised my passport, then proceeded to hold it up at different angles as though it was a forgery. I stood patiently as he fingered the pages, looking up at me suspiciously every few moments, then suddenly lost it, snatched my passport from his hand and yelled behind me as I walked through that if he's so dedicated to preventing illegals from entering the country he should go check his mother's papers.

about six years ago was 2003, 2004 or 2005......

and you're claiming that post 9/11 you 'snatched' your passport away from an immigration official at the airport and then screamed at him as you walked off?

please.

only if james thurber had written walter mitty as an islamophobe.

Yes and well done, 2003-2004 were both post 911 years. If you need to know I also had a run in with finger-on-the-trigger cops at luggage retrieval about 7 years ago (also after and closer to 911) when they insisted I do not leave my bag, which I had just taken off the belt, to go find a trolley because someone nicked mine; it turned a bit abusive when they threatened to 'give me a hard time', but was resolved when I offered my wrists as I walked off for a trolley. Could be they figured it's your lot they're supposed to be pretending to give a hard time.

Originally Posted by keda

Originally Posted by Mr Gribbs

Most of the muzzies immigrants and first & second generationers came to the UK from countries that were once colonized by the UK. No colonization no muzzies. The UK was also supporting radical muzzies up until the start of 2000. London became a home for many radical muzzies from Algeria, Chechnya, Balkans, Arab world, and Africa. This is blowback.

When were Pakistan and Bangla Desh colonised by the Brits; or Algeria, the Balkans and Chechnya for that matter?

If you look at the history of India, which I don't expect you to, Islam has usurped some 40% of that country - through agitation - and turned the spoils into failed Islamic states teeming with high growth rates of dysfunctional people.

The colonisation you refer to is by Islam, as an ongoing trend over 1400 years. If it isn't too painful a truth, Islam was hatched in a town of the Arabian Peninsula, and how do you (or any other blinkered fools) believe it has managed to expand exponentially, if not through colonisation?

What happened 1400 years ago is irrelevant. The damage Britain has done to the Muslim is undeniable. This isn't the first time they've had their troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. They also had their troops in what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh. They controlled Yemen, the controlled Sudan (Killed the "mad mullah), they tried to takeover the Suez Canal, to that point Islamic fundamentalist were a margninal factor in Egypt. They created Israel to use its ports to ship oil in the Medditeranean. They handed Saudi Arabia over to the crazy Wahhabis and the Saudi Royal Family. They brought Chinese and Indians into Malaysia. When you use your troops to kill people and steal their resources they aren't going to throw sweets to the troops, that is just common sense. I'm probably only scratching the surface with all I mentioned.

What I can't figure is that none of this has been reported on Australian TV or in Australian newspapers?
All I have seen is the Royals Laying wreaths?
My personal experience with Aus. media is that it is being censored one way or another on anything to do with Islam or a discussion on the beliefs of the "Indefensible"?
Are we sure this report is factual and current?
I guess Anzac Day is the obvious next choice?

One thing is for sure the pendulum will swing and it will not end well.

Sure, as long as the West remains paralysed by pc fundamentalism that prevents us from throttling it.

Originally Posted by seamus48

Originally Posted by bankao dreamer

Just got back home from remembrance parade no "PROTESTERS" in sight so Im not in jail for breaching there human rights.
BD

Our local Remembrance Service was well attended today. Particularly sad knowing that we had lost another young lad overnight. Condolences to his family and of course all those who have gone before. Sleep well and thankyou.

Well said seamus but unfortunately he wont be the last.

The 'use' of a national occasion such as Remembrance Day to stage a protest is of course well established- because it maximises the resultant media attention, which is the whole point of staging a protest. So it gets the Press, it gets the 'king & country' brigade up in arms, and Rupert Murdoch is happy because he sells more papers.

So pardon my sardonicism, but at the end of the day I think you are collectively slightly missing the point here. The most significant thing about this muzzie Remembrance day protest is the paltry attendance, all of 50- and this in central London. I'm sure the organisers would have been disappointed- not that they would admit it, but they even hyped up the protest on the internet, and got a net attendance of 50, wow. Heck, the EDL staged an 'anti-protest' protest and got the same paltry attendance as the muzzies. And with all of three arrests, no big deal.

Wanna see some real protest movements? Look at the anti-vietnam war rallies in the US, the womens suffragette movement, civil rights protests, even large scale industrial action. This was nothing.

Demonstrations outside mosques in the UK this evening, protesting about the poppy burning.

I'm sure the protests will get more politically bent media traction than murders and gang rapes committed by "Asians".

Affront to justice: A career criminal who killed a young girl in a hit-and-run appeals for asylum

In November 2003, failed asylum seeker Aso Mohammed Ibrahim ran down 12-year-old Amy Houston and, in the words of the girl’s father, left her to ‘die like a dog’ under his car.

Yet seven years later Ibrahim, a malevolent career criminal who fled the scene of the accident, has won a string of appeals against deportation.

Sickeningly, his case for staying in the UK is that he has a right — under Labour’s insidious Human Rights Act — to a family life with his wife and two children, fathered after he sneaked into the country illegally.


Threatened with deportation: Career criminal Aso Mohammed Ibrahim is appealing to remain in the UK under the Human Rights Act

To hell with the family — and young life — he so casually destroyed.

If there is a shred of sanity to our legal system, the court currently considering a final attempt by the government to have Ibrahim deported will end this affront to justice, and throw him out.

However, with 350 foreign criminals escaping deportation under human rights law every year, experience teaches us to fear the very worst.

Career criminal who killed young girl in hit-and-run appeals for asylum | Mail Online

This is an atypical rant by the DMail against a system falling into decay through no small influence of the Human Rights Act. We need to shred that, and replace it with something founded on common sense.

More filth protected by democratic niceties.

Originally Posted by Bower

Demonstrations outside mosques in the UK this evening, protesting about the poppy burning.

Not long before the race war is under way in earnest.

Tick tock.

Sickeningly, his case for staying in the UK is that he has a right — under Labour’s insidious Human Rights Act

13 years of Labour and what have they left us with...? scum like this running wild and killing young kids.

I wonder what would have happened if any Infiddel had done something similar in a muslim shithole?

I'm 100% sure that his or hers human rights wouldn't be an issue and justice would be swift and vengeful.

I sincerely hope the law abiding majority in Britain can get a message across to the stupid PC politicians that we neither want, need or will continue to tolerate this muslim scum in Britain!

If not relations can only continue to deteriorate to the stage where racism will flourish regardless of what any left wing, pc minded politiican would have us believe.

after labours mess up, a bit of racism is the least of our worries