Thread: George H.W. Bush dead at 94

^From the looks of that pic, Carter's next in line...

followed by clinton.....

Well it's the way death usually goes...

i've noticed that too.....

Originally Posted by SKkin

^From the looks of that pic, Carter's next in line...

No doubt we'll learn what a great American he was when they plant him.

^^...strange it apparently needed pointing out.

Originally Posted by SKkin

^From the looks of that pic, Carter's next in line...

Based on what criteria did you come to that surprising speculation?

Originally Posted by jabir

No doubt we'll learn what a great American he was when they plant him.

Hardly anybody could surpass his ingenious successors (6 pcs)...

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Hardly anybody could surpass his ingenious successors (6 pcs)...

exactly....Clinton Foundation vs Carter Center.

What the Clintons do with (and for) their money? And what Carter (in his age) does? Quite a difference, isn't it?
However, from a POTUS something else is expected by his subjects...

Originally Posted by jabir

No doubt we'll learn what a great American he was when they plant him.

I like him much better than Bush...

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Based on what criteria did you come to that surprising speculation?

He looks like death warmed over?

I used to listen to this man on Sirius/XM satellite radio...until they yanked him off the air. Shortly after that, I yanked my subscription.

Lionel Nation was his program name...

The Uncensored History of George H.W. "Rubbers" Bush: Daddy Prescott, BBH, Hitler & Margaret Sanger:

^Interesting to read the comments under this video on youtube, mentioning also the Bush's speach at Gerald Ford's funeral:



BTW, John Pilger on yesterday talk with RT Underground, he has mentioned also few things about the late GHW Bush, something that hadn't been "highlighted" on his funeral...

^RT bullshit....a .5 second snippet of something than could be interpreted as a laugh...could be any number of other things.

And YT comments?

Christ, klondick, you really will grasp at any old shit as a source won't you?

If it is on RT it cannot be true, can be? We believe only what our "recognized media" trumpeting... (how generous and magnificent our world leaders are)

Originally Posted by Klondyke

If it is on RT it cannot be true,

It's true in that bush did what's being shown.....using it as proof that he's guilty of a jfk cover-up is beyond absurd.

Originally Posted by uncle junior

using it as proof that he's guilty of a jfk cover-up is beyond absurd.

It's not just RT. Bush senior was a CIA man...and the CIA had an iron in that fire. I think that's been pretty well established from plenty of other sources.

From an article about Robert Gates'(another CIA man) book "Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War"

JFK Wished He Could Splinter The CIA 'Into A Thousand Pieces And Scatter It Into The Winds'

…If Allen had not yet confronted the implications of the Bay of Pigs disaster, Kennedy had. In private he cursed "CIA bastards" for luring him into it, and wished he could "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds."

He should have. America would have been much better off. But all he did was fire Dulles, too late to prevent the horrors the Dulles brothers committed in our names in Guatemala, Iran, Indonesia, Vietnam, not to mention the Congo and Cuba.

That JFK quote about splintering the CIA may be questionable, but he obviously had a problem with Dulles and the CIA. The CIA had a problem with JFK's actions regarding the Bay of Pigs incident.

Originally Posted by SKkin

It's not just RT. Bush senior was a CIA man...and the CIA had an iron in that fire. I think that's been pretty well established from plenty of other sources.

Fair enough if you have an argument built on facts. Conspiracy nutjobs trying to use questions as evidence gets old......'if he's innocent, why does he laugh when he he sez jfk's name?'.......ain't nobody got time for dat

Originally Posted by cyrille

And YT comments?

Christ, klondick, you really will grasp at any old shit as a source won't you?

As a matter of fact, can we hear John Pilger saying - what he was saying - on some "recognized media"? Just curious...

Do you think Pilger changed the facts about this sack of shit (dead thankfully) just because he was on RT?

I trust that someone put a stake through the kunts heart and chopped his head off prior to burial just to make sure the devil doesn't rise again.

^
His "deeds" have no impact on the size of his funeral (or in fact, they have).

Similarly, there were not many big people who missed funeral of good Generalissimos Franco and/or Kaiser Hirihito.

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Similarly, there were not many big people who missed funeral of good Generalissimos Franco and/or Kaiser Hirihito.

That's because all the elite and "leaders" are on the same side... and it ain't bloody our side.