I suppose its safe to say that the UK security forces have got their eyes on quite a few "left wing sympathizers" to the Islamic cause
I suppose its safe to say that the UK security forces have got their eyes on quite a few "left wing sympathizers" to the Islamic cause
Irrelevant what the Kenyans do to those who love death more than most decent people love life. Fact is the operation was a success because enough infidels were slaughtered, and the terrorists expected to meet Allah anyway.
Meanwhile, Western media and powers are still prepared to go on record extolling the virtues of Islam as a religion of peace, while the Leftists at the BBC still cannot bring themselves to report on the event using the word 'terrorist'.
Islam and its apologists have the civilised world precisely where they want it, running, ignorant, and witless.
Fair comment Harry but its fundamentally flawed ,if the Terrorists wanted payback on Kenya ,why was they selective on who they killed? , why did they seemingly go out of their way to ascertain their Victims religion before gunning them down ?, if it was against Kenya why not just kill Kenyans whatever religion they was and free white Christians ?
The Fabians are at it again over at the BBC. Seems they don't want to call a spade a spade and not refer to the terrorists for what they truly are - Terrorists:
BBC under fire over guidance preventing reporters from using the word ‘terrorist’ when covering Nairobi massacre
BBC has continually referred to those behind the terror attack as ‘militants’
By Damien Gayle
The BBC has come under fire for referring to the perpetrators of the Kenyan shopping mall massacre as ‘militants’ rather than ‘terrorists’.
In coverage of the violence at the Westgate mall in Nairobi which has killed more than 60 the Corporation’s journalists have repeatedly described the attackers as ‘Islamic militants’.
It is understood that BBC guidance issued to staff tells them to avoid using the term ‘terrorist’ without attribution, but politicians have reacted with anger to the choice of language.
‘Most members of the British public would see the planned and systematic murder of dozens of innocent people in Kenya as terrorism.
‘Sadly, the BBC looks like it has made a bad judgement call on this and is out of touch with ordinary people on a very important issue.’
In four news bulletins this morning, Neal Sleat, newsreader on Radio 4’s today programme, did not use the word ‘terrorist’ once.
Instead he referred to the culprits as ‘Islamic militants’, while reporters on the BBC website describes those responsible as ‘suspected al-Shabab militants’.
The BBC has come under fire before for apparent influence of political correctness on the choice of language in its journalism.
In January it was criticised for calling the gang behind the Algeria hostage killings ‘militants’ rather than ‘terrorists’. Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said he was disappointed that the broadcaster was ‘consistently’ using the term.
The BBC has specific guidance about the word terrorist, warning its reporters that it can imply value judgements. In one report on its website about the attack at BP’s gas plant, it described the killers as ‘militants’ 12 times. The word ‘terrorist’ appeared only in a quote.
Mr Bridgen quizzed David Cameron on the issue and the Prime Minister agreed that he had a ‘good point’. He added: ‘These are terrorists and they should be described as such.’
Prior to that, in 2011’s summer riots, the BBC repeatedly referred to rioters as ‘protesters’ - even as they were filmed looting shops and attacking police.
BBC under fire over guidance preventing reporters from using the word 'terrorist' when covering Nairobi massacre | Mail Online
A Deplorable Bitter Clinger
Just watching BBC TV they referred to the murderers as "terrorists" maybe some one has given them a "talking to"
It requires a certain kind of kaputnik to blame the BBC for using 'militant' instead of 'terrorist'. I wish those morons would check what term Foxnews used. It's 'militants' as well. Repeatedly. Kenya mall siege will help terror group recruit in US, say experts | Fox News
The grisly massacre at an upscale Kenyan shopping mall by al-Shabab militants is a “great shot in the arm” to the Al Qaeda-linked group’s efforts to recruit fighters from the West, including the U.S., terror experts tell FoxNews.com.
At least 62 people have been killed and nearly 200 others were injured in the Saturday attack by al-Shabab, an extremist Islamic group believed to have roughly several thousand fighters, including a few hundred foreigners. Some of those include recruits from Somali communities in the United States and Europe and intelligence analysts said Monday those numbers could grow now that al-Shabab militants have attacked, running counter to the Obama administration’s claims that Al Qaeda and its global affiliates are weakening.
Just to point out that the Jihadists were indeed selective in who they gunned down Kenya Terrorists: “If You are Muslim… We’ve Come to Rescue You.” | FrontPage Magazine
Sorry to piss on your parade Rainfall but Fox did indeed call the murderers "terrorists" New details emerge on terrorists' multi-layered strategy in Kenya attack, House Intelligence chief says | Fox News
Hey, let's not get lost in semantics!
A bunch of ragheads with a MUSLIM philosophy/banner murders anyone NON_MUSLIM in Kenya.
R U some sort of dealer/politico who wants to minimize this atrocity into a piddling little conflict between minimal rivals, or are ya gonna call a spade a spade!!!
It was a bunch of AL SHABAB that murdered INNOCENTS in cold blood, and if that bitch "the white widow" and her mates and I ever meet up (a possibility in my game) and various loci, I would have no compunction in giving a chance/ or otherwisae.
Hey, ya know, Al Shabab is readin dis shit. so is USA, Echelon, et al.
I am still waiting for all the demonstrations around the world from all the moderate Muslims we are forever being told are totally against these terrorists attacks but never actually hear them. Where are all the people denouncing these people as bad Muslims ? The only way the world is going to rid itself from these terrorists is if the Muslim community turns on these militant Islamists.
We even have Cameron saying the attack had nothing to do with Islam FFS
Start calling these religious savages what they really are
ISLAMIC TERRORISTS
Treat everyone as a complete and utter idiot and you can only ever be pleasantly surprised !
Moderate Muslims are too lost up their own arseholes to say anything about All Shabbab and other Muslim terrorist organisations.
Likewise, Cameron, (the chap who sits down to pee) won't do anything about Islamic jihadism , because he's already compromised by Baroness Warsi and other Muslim newly-appointed aristocracy phonies, his #1 accomplice in disenfranchising UK opposition to upper echelon, aristocratic and royal investment in Arabic (mainly Saudi) venture but also, further, Nigerian and other sub-Saharan investment in oil.
Cameron is just another dickhead and frontman for Brit investment in US led investment in exploitation of fast depleting mineral reserves, globally.
It's not irrelevant. If you look at how Kenya drove Al Shabab from a large swathe of controlled territory to a much smaller coastal area, you actually wonder why they stopped.
I wouldn't want to be a muslim in Somalia right now, I don't think the Kenyans will be asking "Are you a member of Al Shabab by any chance?".
No one likes Al Shabab, but,......
There's enough fwkheds around, wannabe jihadists, martyrs and other disenfranchised, 2nd generation, post immigration status seeking and approval seeking wannabees to make a problem for security in any country,....
So wipe da raghead mudda fwkn cwnts,........dey don't give us, or me, or u any innocents a good time!!!!!
FWKEM!!!
Harry perhaps you are unaware but there is no need for the Kenyans to go into Somalia to seek revenge ,as there are hundreds of thousands of Somali Muslims already living in Kenya in "little Mogadishu" the Kenyans have had problems before with them , admittedly not as bad as this one , never the less there could well be a back lash against them BBC News - Westgate attack: Kenya's 'Little Mogadishu' fears backlash
Last edited by piwanoi; 25-09-2013 at 12:42 PM.
Nothing wrong with semantics, it's a tool for the usual suspects to deflect attention from the real issues.
Each time the peacelovers reach new depths of barbarism, even so far as to separate religions and admit several times that what they did was for Allah, our leaders and media close their eyes and cover their ears and shout it cannot be and they must have read it wrong because everyone knows Islam is a religion of peace.
For my money, future generations fully deserve the consequences of today's outlandish rejection of reality.
I still haven't seen anything on any news sites, other than the one initial, unverified, statement by a Kenyan Minister, to coroborate any non-Somali involvement.
All Somali + some honky bitch, so far.
NAIROBI — One of the Islamist militants who stormed an upscale shopping mall here on Saturday wore a white turban, witnesses said, while others wore black head scarves. Most were in civilian clothes, but a few donned camouflage fatigues. Some carried sophisticated machine guns, and others wielded the AK-47 rifles widely used by African insurgents. Most of the extremists who seized the mall were young and barked orders in English.
More;
Gunmen who stormed Kenya mall reportedly spoke English, were from different countries - The Washington Post
The Kenyans drove Al Shabab where, and how far away is that from the shopping mall?
You are talking of conventional warfare, where two sides meet and one usually pushes the other back, and then in a civilised world both sides sit down to discuss the issues that caused the conflict, and where to go next.
The Kenyans could have pushed Al Shabab to the moon, but Islam thrives on terror and bloodshed, so as long as there is a stone to throw or a gun to fire and an infidel to aim at you will always have a Muslim ready to do Allah's dirty work. And should there be no infidels handy they will throw and fire upon each other, because that is the nature of Islam.
The West must wake up to the reality that we are witnessing just the front end of a religious war with an enemy that was not properly considered in the construction of civilised codes and doctrines and treaties. To Islam, these pretentious documents are weapons to remind a weak and impotent West that those same entrenched values prevent it from effectively addressing an ideology that places itself several rungs lower than the lowest acceptable standards of civilised conduct.
Or of course, our glorious leaders could continue insisting Islam is a religion of peace and hand over the compounded consequences of their fear and complacency to the next generation.
If you want the best target rich environment, it is right over the border and Kenya knows where it is.
The whole reason for this attack was because of the damage Kenya did.
So I wouldn't hold your breath if you think Kenya aren't going to go in and bomb the shit out of what's left.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)