Thread: Explosions Rock Boston Marathon

Originally Posted by sabang

Credible Link (ie not some Indian weblog)?

Credible links suggest they where acting alone .

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

And your point is/was?

Around 12 hours on the clock is the point Booners

The news about the hunt for a 12-member sleeper terrorist cell came out early Sunday morning while Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was questioned for the first time in the evening.

Originally Posted by sabang

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Obviously, to the most casual observer, this Tsarnaev cat had/has a lot of knowledge re other sleeper cells already been reported on in the Statist Media.

Credible Link (ie not some Indian weblog)? All I've read is that they weren't considered to be associated with any such groups, but investigation ongoing.

That report came from The Mirror which also said

"A source close to the investigation said that they have no doubt the brothers were not acting alone. The devices used to detonate the two bombs were highly sophisticated and not the kind of thing people learn from Google"

about the time all the other media was in a frenzy reporting erroneous information.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-n...strong-1844844

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by sabang

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Obviously, to the most casual observer, this Tsarnaev cat had/has a lot of knowledge re other sleeper cells already been reported on in the Statist Media.

Credible Link (ie not some Indian weblog)? All I've read is that they weren't considered to be associated with any such groups, but investigation ongoing.

That report came from The Mirror which also said

"A source close to the investigation said that they have no doubt the brothers were not acting alone. The devices used to detonate the two bombs were highly sophisticated and not the kind of thing people learn from Google"

about the time all the other media was in a frenzy reporting erroneous information.

Boston bombers: FBI hunting 12-strong terrorist

the Mirror is not credible.

Oh, but one thing is interesting. The detonation devise was highly sophisticated because most likely it came from the a armoury or at the very least, made by someone with extensive CIA training. So an Afghan, Iraqi, Iranian, Syrian, Qatari, Malaysian, indonesian, Chinese, Russian......cripes its a long list =- suffice to say, any country n the world where there are bad people and CIA with bags of cash.

^ Source?

Really, just want to read instead of believing you.

Source for the Mirror not being credible?


CNN increasingly twitchy over Piers Morgan's tabloid past as phone hacking scandal spreads to Daily Mirror
Profile: Dark clouds from his past threaten to cast shadow over Morgan’s new life in the sun

There's one.



How about that?

Nicely tied in there - freak Morgan in both of them. (Terrorists trained by CIA in Afghanistan.... )

Originally Posted by pseudolus

The detonation devise was highly sophisticated because most likely it came from the a armoury or at the very least, made by someone with extensive CIA training

Just to be clear, are you referring to the remote devices or something else because. according to what I have heard reported, the devices were similar to the remote controls used on model toy cars.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by pseudolus

The detonation devise was highly sophisticated because most likely it came from the a armoury or at the very least, made by someone with extensive CIA training

Just to be clear, are you referring to the remote devices or something else because. according to what I have heard reported, the devices were similar to the remote controls used on model toy cars.

I was quoting you, you wally

Originally Posted by Humbert

A source close to the investigation said that they have no doubt the brothers were not acting alone. The devices used to detonate the two bombs were highly sophisticated and not the kind of thing people learn from Google.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

I was quoting you, you wally

Boon Mee was the source of that quote. I merely referenced it in my reply to him.
My reply to Boon Me was that the source of the information about bomb making came from Al Qaeda's inspiration magazine. Go back and read the thread, Wally.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by pseudolus

I was quoting you, you wally

Boon Mee was the source of that quote. I merely referenced it in my reply to him.
My reply to Boon Me was that the source of the information about bomb making came from Al Qaeda's inspiration magazine. Go back and read the thread, Wally.

Don't need to Wally, you never questioned its veracity so therefore you knew all about it and accepted it. You then picked it up trying to be clever and cool in front of the other community yankie sheep

^ Your reading comprehension is not very good.

Originally Posted by misskit

^ Your reading comprehension is not very good.

Is that so Teacher? Well, best you stick to semantics and and leave the conversation then. After all, we're hardly going to miss "SOURCE?" and naff all else every 5 posts which is about the sum total from you.

^^
Was that in thaivisa.com/forum rules too?

Seems to me, an outsider looking in that not only here, but the press at large, no one is asking questions about real things.
When the bombs exploded, no perimeter was set up, The police local or state can't remember said that they had defused or rendered safe other devices. Were they lying or just talking shit.
FBI says they checked out the elder brother and found no threat, yet the CIA, DHS, counter terrorist intelligence, immigration and for all I know the park rangers all had him on the watch lists.
We have police reports of gun battles in the streets of Boston, yet it now appears they only had one firearm between them.
From what I last read the younger brother has been transferred to a decommissioned army base near Boston. Don't Federal Prisons have medical wings, which is where I would think a Federal prisoner would go.
Many, many unanswered questions and have a feeling many will never be answered. Jim

Yep, it's the same scenario as before. Too much fog, then used as an excuse to suspend normal procedures.

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Is that so Teacher? Well, best you stick to semantics and and leave the conversation then. After all, we're hardly going to miss "SOURCE?" and naff all else every 5 posts which is about the sum total from you

You can stop posting complete and utter baloney and there will be no problems from me. You make up things or don't want to admit where you got your information. I would rather actually investigate where the report came from than suck up every word written, especially if written by fools like you.

I've no problem with your opinion, just want you to be truthful about your source of news if you indeed have one.

FYI. I am not a teacher.

Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer

^^
Was that in thaivisa.com/forum rules too?

If you directed that at me, no. I am not the clown that linked to the TV rules.

SOURCE?

I back up most things with a source, and yet, you never do, and if you do, you bring the Mirror or another Zionest owned puppet rag who gets all their information from press conferences from politicians and government officials and writes what they tell them to write. Show me one piece of investigative journalism in any of the rags you support and believe are true and I might take them seriously.

All they do is stand at a press conference, never question, and write verbatim what they have been told. Gullible people soak it all up, and try to ridicule those who seek more information out. Jokes on you dear, but with you and your ilk about we all suffer in the long run.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

I back up most things with a source, and yet, you never do, and if you do, you bring the Mirror ofr another Zionest owned puppet rag blah blah blah blah

Hold it right there. This is where you go right off the rails. This is where your comprehension has gone adrift. Humbert and myself quoted the Mirror report as a laugh. Boon Mee linked to a blog siting that Mirror report. We know it was trash.

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by pseudolus

I back up most things with a source, and yet, you never do, and if you do, you bring the Mirror ofr another Zionest owned puppet rag blah blah blah blah

Hold it right there. This is where you go right off the rails. This is where your comprehension has gone adrift. Humbert and myself quoted the Mirror report as a laugh. Boon Mee linked to a blog siting that Mirror report. We know it was trash.

You quoted it as a source. Just because you and humbert can not see that there is actually ZERO difference between the Mirror and your preferred "sources" that's not my concern. They are all the same. TV, Internet, Radio, Newspaper. All owned by 6 people, all the reporters banned from asking questions and forced to tell lies and deceit. All of them sit dutifully at the press conferences and ask the same BS questions and never ever investigate if what they are told is true. Its all bullshit propaganda and you suck it up.

So pick a decent investigative questioning source next time or stick to the Sun and the Mirror.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So pick a decent investigative questioning source next time.

What are our choices?

Originally Posted by beazalbob69

Why are so many people utterly and rabidly against alternate viewpoints? Why should everything just be accepted as the honest to God truth if it comes from an authority?

Because its uncool to think any other way.

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So pick a decent investigative questioning source next time.

What are our choices?

well that really is your problem. You don't believe anything not written in the junk mainstream media, and yet, all of that is propaganda (compare 6 articles reporting the same thing on different Mainstream sources - all the same, almost verbatim).

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

what was the reason Tsarnaev was Mirandized?

So that what he says can be used in court against him. It's pretty simple and I'm not sure why conservatives are so against this.
Why do conservatives seem to think they can pick and choose what amendments should stay and which ones should go? ie. the 2nd amendment vs. the 5th.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by misskit

^ Your reading comprehension is not very good.

Is that so Teacher? Well, best you stick to semantics and and leave the conversation then. After all, we're hardly going to miss "SOURCE?" and naff all else every 5 posts which is about the sum total from you.

No flaming in the news forum dickweed, remember? You got a problem with projection innit? No matter where a thread is you treat it as if it were politics. How freeking boring .. a one-trick pony trying to be somebody online, lonely friendless nancy.