Thread: This guy is fuking insane!

See ENT, positive and civil, it's not hard, and doesn't it feel much better?

A gift demands a gift.

And what is unacceptable may be returned.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

You're totally off your rocker dingo brains.

Meaning #1 as you posted indicates that which I said.

No, you said anyone born in the country is a native of and therefore indigenous to it.
This

1. originating in and characteristic of a particular region or country; native (often followed by to ):

Has quite a DIFFERENT meaning, which I understand may not be immediately obvious to the less sharp among us (you).
Because someone was born in a place does not mean they 'originated' there or are characteristic of that place.
If an Indian were born in NZ do you think he would be Characteristic of NZ?

Yes, and a native of NZ.

Still banging on about that, ENT ? Getting caught up in the trees without seeing the forest ? That wasn't the point anyway. The study you quoted referred to Australian aboriginal people.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

You're totally off your rocker dingo brains.

Meaning #1 as you posted indicates that which I said.

No, you said anyone born in the country is a native of and therefore indigenous to it.
This

1. originating in and characteristic of a particular region or country; native (often followed by to ):

Has quite a DIFFERENT meaning, which I understand may not be immediately obvious to the less sharp among us (you).
Because someone was born in a place does not mean they 'originated' there or are characteristic of that place.
If an Indian were born in NZ do you think he would be Characteristic of NZ?

Yes, and a native of NZ.

So he would be indigenous to New Zealand?
He certainly wouldn't be characteristic of a NZ.
But as latin dancer pointed out, the only thing that survey concluded was that the idigenous aboriginal people of Australia, colloquially refered to as 'abbos', are the thickest indigenous people on the planet.
I'm not surprised.

^
You haven't been to NZ

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Still banging on about that, ENT ? Getting caught up in the trees without seeing the forest ? That wasn't the point anyway. The study you quoted referred to Australian aboriginal people.

I didn't quote a study.

I posted four links.

Originally Posted by FlyFree

^maybe a gay Kiwi?

Do you mean a metro man?

^

It took you 1 1/2 hours to think of that?

Longer.

ENT has this woods/trees problem.

For instance, if asked the question what is 1+6;

ENT would probably say 7

Most would see it's a gangbang.

Which is what's happening here.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Still banging on about that, ENT ? Getting caught up in the trees without seeing the forest ? That wasn't the point anyway. The study you quoted referred to Australian aboriginal people.

I didn't quote a study.

I posted four links.

You posted one link

15-12-2011, 02:29 PM #603 (permalink) ENT
Thailand Expat

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chiangmai
Posts: 2,287



Check this out ockers.


World’s Average IQ Distribution Map : Sabahan.com

which led us to this.

The map referenced by this article was taken from the book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis” by Richard Lynn. The book focuses on intelligence per race NOT nationality. Richard and Co “tested” (actually just used others research) approximately 813,778 individuals worldwide so basically 0.01% of the worlds population. The people tested were only those indigenous to each country, so for Australia only 2.4% (approximately 400, 000 people) of the population is indigenous, whereas Asia has an indigenous population of 70%.
References
Race Differences in Intelligence (book) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indigenous peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
World population - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
University of Cincinnati Official Athletic Site

Originally Posted by ENT

^
You haven't been to NZ

Are you saying the Maoris are thicker than the Abbos?
Apparently not according to the study you directed us to.
(And my personal experience)

Originally Posted by Latindancer

That's the hilarious part ! He tells us "you just keep coming back for more", including this smiley
but it's HE who is getting punished, and it's obvious to all....as Flyfree has confirmed.

You went to an English public school... right, ENT ?

Wrong again, little tefler.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

^
You haven't been to NZ

Are you saying the Maoris are thicker than the Abbos?
Apparently not according to the study you directed us to.
(And my personal experience)

No, your assumption is the product of your skewed logic.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Still banging on about that, ENT ? Getting caught up in the trees without seeing the forest ? That wasn't the point anyway. The study you quoted referred to Australian aboriginal people.

I didn't quote a study.

I posted four links.

You posted one link

15-12-2011, 02:29 PM #603 (permalink) ENT
Thailand Expat

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chiangmai
Posts: 2,287



Check this out ockers.


World’s Average IQ Distribution Map : Sabahan.com

which led us to this.

The map referenced by this article was taken from the book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis” by Richard Lynn. The book focuses on intelligence per race NOT nationality. Richard and Co “tested” (actually just used others research) approximately 813,778 individuals worldwide so basically 0.01% of the worlds population. The people tested were only those indigenous to each country, so for Australia only 2.4% (approximately 400, 000 people) of the population is indigenous, whereas Asia has an indigenous population of 70%.
References
Race Differences in Intelligence (book) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indigenous peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
World population - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
University of Cincinnati Official Athletic Site

Not very clever Koojo.

There were three links to IQ levels posted,

None were very flattering of Australia.

Originally Posted by FlyFree

ENT has this woods/trees problem.

For instance, if asked the question what is 1+6;

ENT would probably say 7

Most would see it's a gangbang.

Which is what's happening here.

Not being an Ocker, gangbangs are unknown by "most" in my culture.

That practice originated in Oz, as part of the "Bankstown bodgies" hoon trip into King's X and elsewhere in the 1960's.

Since there was a shortage of women in Oz at the time, the "men" had to share it around a bit, so gangbanging took over from sheepshagging in the Sydney suburbs.
A practice you're familiar with, it seems.

Originally Posted by ENT

None were very flattering of Australia.

uh huh. Like Wales is leading the world in education and research

You should check out the real figures ENT.

I actually just watched a doco called 'The Finland Phenomena', which looked at Finland's approach to education. They pump up some pretty smart kids, and Australia is moving towards educating on this model. Not that this will help with our inherintly indegenous low IQ's

^
What are the "real" figures?

Gonna be a long slow move for Oz to get to Finland's model.

Certainly won't help re. Ocker indegenes, going by your spelling of (sic) "inherintly", above.

The 'real' figures are not an article on abos. The real figures rank Australia higher than Wales for IQ as well as most other fields. Funny how you posted a link to that obscure article when the real figures are readily available and easy to find.

Pointing out spelling mistakes just makes posters look like anal wankers. You can do better than that, considering you're a full time multi-nicking troll.

So, ENT, tell us, where does Australia really rank in terms of IQ and education compared to Wales?

Originally Posted by ENT

Gonna be a long slow move for Oz to get to Finland's model.

What makes you say that. What initiatives are the Aus. Government lacking to acheive this goal, apart from an inharuntly stooopid population?

Are we moving to far away from the sophisticated Welsh model?