Thread: This guy is fuking insane!

Originally Posted by ENT

Another site;

hEyOkA mAgAzInE

WMR has learned from knowledgeable Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) sources that the Bush administration is putting the final touches on a plan that would see martial law declared in the United States with various scenarios anticipated as triggers. The triggers include a continuing economic collapse with massive social unrest, bank closures resulting in violence against financial institutions, and another fraudulent presidential election that would result in rioting in major cities and campuses around the country.

The Bush administration is no longer in government numbnuts

Bullies are easy to pick out.

They gang up, bait, goad, twist words and actually try to appear intelligent.

They also can not spell or will use malapropisms.

Moonraker and Hazz are classic examples of this kind of behaviour.

Interesting part of it all is that they are blissfully unaware that they are being observed and noted.

They are conditioned into this type of behaviour because when younger they saw that pain and fear of social ridicule were powerful tools.

So, they ape their early cruel masters, trying to achieve power.

How ridiculous.

Originally Posted by Moonraker

Originally Posted by ENT

Another site;

hEyOkA mAgAzInE

WMR has learned from knowledgeable Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) sources that the Bush administration is putting the final touches on a plan that would see martial law declared in the United States with various scenarios anticipated as triggers. The triggers include a continuing economic collapse with massive social unrest, bank closures resulting in violence against financial institutions, and another fraudulent presidential election that would result in rioting in major cities and campuses around the country.

The Bush administration is no longer in government numbnuts

Your usual slop and drivel.

Obama has continued with the program.

Just Google or go to Wikipedia, or use any search device at your disposal and see what comes up.

Well ENT, and I am having to repeat myself.

You directed me to this link: Camp FEMA

On which the very first paragraph says:

Recent legislation attempting to legitimize the use of internment camps to detain U.S. citizens in the event of an uprising or civil unrest has many people asking what nation they live in.

What legislation are they talking about? Show me this piece of legislation and you might sway me a little.

Originally Posted by Moonraker

Well ENT, and I am having to repeat myself.

You directed me to this link: Camp FEMA

On which the very first paragraph says:

Recent legislation attempting to legitimize the use of internment camps to detain U.S. citizens in the event of an uprising or civil unrest has many people asking what nation they live in.

What legislation are they talking about? Show me this piece of legislation and you might sway me a little.

It is I having to repeat myself.

The link to legislation referred to can be found in my previous post #142.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Moonraker

Well ENT, and I am having to repeat myself.

You directed me to this link: Camp FEMA

On which the very first paragraph says:

Recent legislation attempting to legitimize the use of internment camps to detain U.S. citizens in the event of an uprising or civil unrest has many people asking what nation they live in.

What legislation are they talking about? Show me this piece of legislation and you might sway me a little.

It is I having to repeat myself.

The link to legislation referred to can be found in my previous post #142.

Oh, you must mean this one:

Originally Posted by ENT

Try this site, see what you make of it.

Read The Bill: H.R. 645 [111th] - GovTrack.us

Which is the one that you accused me of misquoting you when I extracted this from that very link that YOU gave:

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.
(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure--
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;
(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;
(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and
(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.

We've come full circle.

This is evidence of a legislation being passed to prepare facilities for humanitarian reasons in the case of an emergency. I wasn't asking for that, I was asking for a legislation legitimising the use of internment camps.

Nothing then?

^ It's all in there, just read the lot, it's much more than the little bit you quote above.

Sec. 2
(4) to meet other appropriate needs as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.

What appropriate needs?

You really don't read much do you, you tend to skim a bit.

That was in the same bit that I quoted.

What appropriate needs? = The appropriate needs of people that are in need of assistance, as is clearly outlined in that very section.

Who knows ENT, perhaps it could just be lies but where is the evidence to suggest they are lying.

^
Read the last paragraph in the link hayoka magazine I posted earlier.

It refers to C and R, conflict and revolution.

USA is about to go tits up.

You mean this paragraph?

On April 3, 2008, WMR reported on a highly-classified document regarding the martial law scenario: WMR has learned from knowledgeable sources within the US financial community that an alarming confidential and limited distribution document is circulating among senior members of Congress and their senior staff members that is warning of a bleak future for the United States if it does not quickly get its financial house in order. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is among those who have reportedly read the document. The document is being called the "C & R" document because it reportedly states that if the United States defaults on loans and debt underwriting from China, Japan, and Russia, all of which are propping up the United States government financially, and the United States unilaterally cancels the debts, America can expect a war that will have disastrous results for the United States and the world. "Conflict" is the "C word" in the document. The other scenario is that the federal government will be forced to drastically raise taxes in order to pay off debts to foreign countries to the point that the American people will react with a popular revolution against the government. "Revolution" is the document’s "R word.

2 things

1) How does this count as evidence in support of the concentration camp theory

and

2) How do we know this document even exists?

^
1) It's a reference, not evidence.


2) How do you know that the moon exists?

^ 1) What concentration camp theory?

2) The doc. exists, ref. already posted. Google, research, you'll find more info.

1)

Originally Posted by ENT

^ Google;

REX-84

Plenty of info on the web.

Dept. Homeland Secuity, USA.

Massive camps, massive number of camps.

The US gov. is expecting a large influx of residents to these camps from somewhere.

Those residents are unlikely to be privileged folk in the US.

Go figure, Moonraker, CNemo, LDancer, Hazz et al.

Maybe it's just an elephant in the room! Eh?

2) You showed a reference to some bloke saying the document exists, not evidence of it's existence.

^
1) No mention of concentration camps there.

2) It's a reference, not evidence.

Since you want hard evidence, I suggest you take a tour of the USA and contact as many senators as you can re. the matter.

As far as I can see, no proof is ever offered on this forum.

Do newspaper articles "prove" anything?

Of course not.

Don't bother, Moonraker. This is typical ENT thinking. You'll go round and round pursuing him logically, but in the end come to nothing. He's quite deluded.
And this is the third time he's posted a link which does not support his argument, but actually the reverse. It's quite comical.
What kind of medication do you usually take, ENT ?

^^

1)

2) So we still don't know if the document even exists.

ENT has me marked?

That's me in trouble then!

Do they have FEMA camps on the moon base spaceship?

No one can be certain of that because the moon landings were faked.

^ ^ Now we can all see that you're cuckoo.


And of course LD, the twister,...

No argument has been offered, read carefully.

Originally Posted by Moonraker

You see I actually enjoy these nut job theories and suspect that one of them in the future may be well turn out to be true. I'm wide open to the possibility that governments etc are doing things they should not be doing but without evidence, these theories amount to nothing.

Strangely enough, I think the same thing, as I admitted in the "9/11....what really happened" thread.

I generally don't 'side' with anyone, as I don't know the style of anyone on this forum that well.
I go with logical thinking and the scientific method, and Ent does not display these. Hence my occasional teasing.

Just off-topic briefly....as a matter of interest, did the water reach your house, Bettyboo ? And the car ? What finally happened there ?