Yep, bring'em on. The police in NKP / or Bangkok would care less about pictures with Bananas in them. They would laugh at why someone would care so much about them.
I stole Stickman's readership? Well, then, can I claim that Stickman got his readers from Trink? Then effectively, have I stolen Trink's readership? If anything I'm encouraging the readership to stay focused on what Stickman writes.
And the answer is No, I never called Stickman a racist. In fact I said quite the opposite about Stick. I wrote that I did not think he was a racist. Surely there must be enough to gripe about without needing to change my articles to do it. However, of I would have called him a racist, it would have had nothing to do with being a Kiwi and therefore you should have not taken offense because it anyhow.
I am not part of the moral police. If guys want to whore around or do things like that -- ok. That's their choice.
If guys are publishing lies on the Internet, I can complain about it. That's basically what I do -- and I try to have a little fun with it. I feel that I'm arguing this ethics of the publishing rather than the morality of the person.
David at MangoSauce is a lair and has always been a liar. What is much more likely is that he owns the BangkokGirlFriend site and I have a remote guess that he is going to hide his identity there and pick up where he left off. Now, David claims someone else did the BangkokGirlFriend site, but that doesn’t wash very well. I believe that BangkokGirlFriend is not currently blocked from Google ads so this would be a good place to migrate to. After all that “other person” used exactly that same format and writes exactly the same style articles as David. It could not be a much better copy – and strangely enough – David never complained about the copy cat site stealing his readership… So, add 2 and 2 together – and what do you come up with? The web site shell game.
Need a little more evidence?? Just look and see how both of these sites are registered.