Thread: On Second Thoughts

By the way, I wonder what "Seemingly in Thailand for some time due to his slight knowledge of the Thai language" means.

A Yank, a Pom, a Kangaroo, and a few Thais.

Is that enough for a full house?

Was he protesting after the decree that people not protest?

Is this about Barbra ??

What's this all about?

I voted yes, but i'm not sure what for.

Originally Posted by Nawty

Is this about Barbra ??

That would be a yes vote

It's wasn't about anyone on this forum (that I know of).

wot, no toffee option?

A thread fuk

Originally Posted by English Noodles

On Second Thoughts

Shan't bother voting.

Not sure who you are asking about but if its that guy who said that then I say yes.

WTF???

Originally Posted by PaulBunyon

Not sure who you are asking about but if its that guy who said that then I say yes.

That's three 'yes' votes to jail Milkman/Barbara and two 'no' votes to not jail the other guy

Milkman ? I thought Poodles was referring to Spin.

I retract my YES vote.

I watched "Yes Man" with Jim Carrey last night and have decided to follow his lead and say YES to everything.
If the film was called "No Man" I would have voted in the negative.
Am I voting about the milkman thing by the way?

Originally Posted by Bogon

Am I voting about the milkman thing by the way?

No. It's quite simple to find out what the thread was about, just 'google' the quote in the first reply on the thread.

The quote is a contradiction, the picture is of Boon Mee.

Hang him high.

^ Cheers noodles. Get it now.
Could have been about the milkman thing though.

Originally Posted by English Noodles

No. It's quite simple to find out what the thread was about, just 'google' the quote in the first reply on the thread.

Thanks, now I understand.

I noticed you voted no in the poll.
Yet here you say this about the Aussie, who is basically guilty of the same thing. (Though the Aussie is now digging a deep hole in his disregard for the courts.)

Originally Posted by English Noodles

He was taking part in a political protest. He is being charged with breaking the emergency decree, which states amongst other things, that taking part in any political protest in a group of 5 or more people is illegal while the province (Bangkok in this case) is under emergency decree. He was observed speaking on the red shirt main stage, there is video and photographic evidence to show this. What more evidence is needed?

https://teakdoor.com/thailand-and-asi...dshirt-12.html (Briton facing death penalty over redshirt riot)

What did this guy do any different than the Aussie
Why the contradiction in your views?

Originally Posted by pickel

What did this guy do any different than the Aussie Why the contradiction in your views?

Where is the contradiction exactly? Where do I do anything other than state the reason for the Australians arrest? And as I was replying to a post saying 'I'm not sure what evidence they have', I listed the evidence, and asked what more the authorities needed? No contradiction.