Then why did he wait four months before he managed to sardonically bring up his complaint at a regular meeting? Couldn't he have got on their case a lot sooner about this, or used one of his other back up suppliers?
Printable View
Then why did he wait four months before he managed to sardonically bring up his complaint at a regular meeting? Couldn't he have got on their case a lot sooner about this, or used one of his other back up suppliers?
Of course, if that's the case.
I'd put that down to poor business acumen. Not lack of adaptation, or having to put up with a local imbecile.
My apologies bkka, it wasn't your initial report I read, it was from EmperorTud.
And this is your version of events, which curiously enough you didn't bring up at the time.Quote:
The guy refused to pay his bill, repeatedly. He was warned, repeatedly, then tried to leave without paying, and insulted me and my friends.
Perhaps you are not describing the same incident. I'm not sure how many fights you lads get into every month, it probably get's confusing for you.Quote:
The offender was being violent and agressive to Tud, myself, female staff and the owner, whom he punched to the ground, breaking his spectacles (IIRC) and causing a head injury.
ps. when I was talking about Brits being violent in prostitute bars in Thailand, I wasn't talking about the guy who didn't pay his bill. :rolleyes:
The owner in question was at a dinner at Timber's, along with myself, Marmite, Minime and Hillbilly. The facts are not in question here. In fact the only matter at hand is the reason why certain posters felt the necessity to stalk and flame Tud over this and on this thread, which had nothing to do with the incident.
Thank you.
This isn't a court, why would/should a post on this board read like a witness statement?
Oh, there is no doubt over which incident we are talking about. Fights are not actually a common occurrence on nights out.
I can't actually see why you are going on about this. It feels like you have been suckered into Ant's stalking mission...:deadhorsebig:
Insofar as the comments on the supplier issue go, are we still talking about the situation described in the OP?
I believe you missed the sardonic tone again, I will add smileys next time. :rolleyes:Quote:
Thank you.
I just thought it was funny and a bit unbelievable that the events changed so much once you was pulled up on it. Typical back pedalling and face saving exercises from the both of you. You really should try out for some Thai political party.Quote:
This isn't a court, why would/should a post on this board read like a witness statement?
Didn't you tell Robski to meet up with you at Onnut beer garden last week so you could give him an 'attitude adjustment'. That is until Robski pulled you up on it and you whimpered out of the situation. Well until you was back in Thailand and then you asked for the meet up again. Of course knowing full well Robski was in England at the time. :)Quote:
Oh, there is no doubt over which incident we are talking about. Fights are not actually a common occurrence on nights out.
Merely an afternoon's entertainment.Quote:
I can't actually see why you are going on about this.
If you are referring to me, I don't give a shit about saving face.Quote:
Originally Posted by bkkmadness
Think it was yourself hinting at poor business acumen with those Q's. I gave the answer with an 'if that's the case' before it.Quote:
BKKMadness:
Then why did he wait four months before he managed to sardonically bring up his complaint at a regular meeting? Couldn't he have got on their case a lot sooner about this, or used one of his other back up suppliers?
^^ Red him Tud, he's got a full house of greens.
But your word doesn't count for much round these parts anymore Tud.Quote:
No, I've already told you I couldn't give a shit what people think about the incident.
You are economical with the truth, we've established that.
You think I give a shit about what you think after your bitter and ultimately embarrassing slew of personal attack posts you made against me on another thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by bkkmadness
It was painfully obvious to even the most detached posters that I hit a nerve there.
I thought you were putting me on ignore? Now you are becoming obsessive and as another poster pointed out, more and more like Ant Robertson day by day.
Time to give the forum a rest for a while and go out for a walk, visit a temple or some other relaxing activity to bring your blood pressure down to an agreeable level.
I'm not angry Tud, it's quite funny to me watching you squirm. Nice to see you have got a little fight left in you after your sulk the other day.
I said I might put you on ignore if you carried on with all your anti Thai rants. You got the message and cut it down, well done. I'm quite thankful I didn't put you on ignore actually, I've had some great laughs over the last few days reading your posts.
Yes it was very obvious, especially after I confirmed the fact by saying myself you hit a nerve there and made me a little angry, I find it amazingly easy to admit to these things.Quote:
It was painfully obvious to even the most detached posters that I hit a nerve there.
'Honesty' Tud, something you can't seem to manage.
No, but you give a shit about me making you lose face daily on here don't you, which forum will you run to next I wonder?Quote:
You think I give a shit about what you think
Great stuff Tud, keep it coming! :)
Disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by bkkmadness
That's a very Ant style post.
No, see above posts for clarification.Quote:
Originally Posted by bkkmadness
I didn't get any message, I'll post what I want when I want. If you consider a post 'anti-Thai', that's up to you, but don't flatter yourself that I think about your hurt feelings when I write.Quote:
Originally Posted by bkkmadness
^So what did I get wrong?
Why isn't this in MKP yet?
Sorry Tud, your posts are unbelievable, you have been named and shamed as dishonest man.
There is plenty of people who must disagree with my posts on here, and many that think I am a prick, I have no doubts about that, but I don't think anybody here could call the bkkmadness's integrity into question so easily.
As someone said before, you have lost creditability on this forum, and it's unlikely you will ever get it back.
Tud as I said earlier, I know you don't care what I think.Quote:
If you consider a post 'anti-Thai', that's up to you, but don't flatter yourself that I think about your hurt feelings when I write.
^^^I'm beginning to see why you and Turd are such good pals. Tell you what, why don't you go back the few pages in the thread and work it out for yourself, it's all there.
If I have to spell every little thing out for you you'll never learn anything. Teach a man to fish and all that.
^Oh you mean the section when you lied about the incident in the bar?
Or was it the section where you deliberatly misrepresented the events after the offender left the bar?
Why do lawyers lie so much?
And why are you still here?
Do you mean credibility?Quote:
Originally Posted by bkkmadness
That's true; your spelling is atrocious!Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Yes that's it thank you Tud. Let me try again.
"You have lost all credibility on this forum"
Actually, I believe creditability works too doesn't it?
Perhaps someone better educated than me can tell me whether Tud has lost credibility or credability?
The meaning I want is the one that describes him of a man who has lost the respect of the forum members through his economical truths, back pedaling and overall foolishness which has brought him down to the level of pointing out my spelling mistakes.
^^:rofl: