I asked Chat GPT what kind of president would allow a person like Laura Loomer influence executive decisions. Here is the answer:
-----------------------
Laura Loomer is a far-right activist known for her controversial statements and conspiracy theories. She’s been banned from multiple platforms for spreading misinformation and making inflammatory remarks, including ones widely viewed as racist and Islamophobic. So, someone giving her influence in executive decisions would almost certainly be courting or condoning extremist rhetoric.
A president who allows someone like Loomer to have influence would likely:
- Embrace far-right populism – They're probably aligning with a base that thrives on culture wars, anti-establishment sentiment, and aggressive nationalism.
- Disregard conventional norms – They might intentionally flout traditional standards of political decorum or institutional respect.
- Prioritize media spectacle over policy depth – Giving someone like Loomer a seat at the table isn’t about policy expertise; it’s about messaging, loyalty, and stirring controversy.
If this is happening, it raises real concerns about judgment, governance priorities, and the kinds of voices shaping national policy.
------------------------
Thought that was pretty good and smarter than the average American!