You think to mut, mongrel.
Get some work done, lazy sod!
You think to mut, mongrel.
Get some work done, lazy sod!
Jawhol, mein Fuhrer! :yerman:Quote:
Originally Posted by stroller
Oh wait, I'm not at work.
When you're not changing Depend® incontinence diapers is your other job worrying about what I'm doing? Hope it pays well.
ant, sorry to interrupt you having fun with your silly flame wars with various posters, but back to the discussion.
replacing your name with "a bloke":
so, ant let's say [a bloke] is on a plane next to some Christian trump supporters and after listening to them praise trump for appointing conservatives to the Supreme Court to support Christian causes
as the plane lands, [a bloke] drops a note on the ground for them: Fuck Jesus, fuck you Christian trump supporters and the rest of you kkk cunts".
the plane lands and [a bloke] is arrested and thinks to himself: fair enough, I deserve to be in handcuffs for what I wrote.
do you think the guy dropping the "fuck jesus" note should be charged with a crime?
I literally couldn't make it any clearer... well, maybe I could increase the font size some more? Would that help?Quote:
Originally Posted by Farangrakthai
Because I'm kinda at a loss how you've managed to quote the answer to your question right above the question.
ok, so you think writing a nasty note on paper can be considered aggravated harassment.
so, how about on facebook, twitter and teakdoor?
Quote:
Aggravated harassment in the second degree, a Class A misdemeanor, occurs when a person intentionally acts to harass, threaten, annoy or alarm another person, using a telephone, telegraph, the mail or any form of written communication, including electronic means.
Why are you quoting a New York state statute and asking me about Facebook, Twitter and Teak Door.
None of those things have anything to do with this thread.
i didn't say where this takes place and you agreed that it's aggravated harassment:
i just googled it and that came up at the top of the page.Quote:
replacing your name with "a bloke":
so, ant let's say [a bloke] is on a plane next to some Christian trump supporters and after listening to them praise trump for appointing conservatives to the Supreme Court to support Christian causes
as the plane lands, [a bloke] drops a note on the ground for them: Fuck Jesus, fuck you Christian trump supporters and the rest of you kkk cunts".
the plane lands and [a bloke] is arrested and thinks to himself: fair enough, I deserve to be in handcuffs for what I wrote.
anyways, you're saying that the law in the uk for writing a note might be different than in thailand for writing a post on t.d.?
not sure about that as thais sue each other like crazy for defamation.
anyways, leaving aside the difference in laws in various countries, what's your opinion:
since you agree that writing a nasty note should be aggravated assault, do you agree that it should be a crime on facebook, twitter and teakdoor, too?
It doesn't really matter what he thinks, does it? He's not the one charging the racist drunken pub landlord with a crime.
The law thinks it is, and that's all that matters.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ted-harassment
I would imagine doing it online is probably a crime these days too, but I can't be arsed to look.
ok, ant, every thread should just discuss the op and not evolve.
:doglol:
anyways, ok, i understand,
lateral thinking isn't your strong point.
fair enough.
though, rather than putting up roadblocks (like you usually do): "OMG, that's a straw-man, i'm not going to discuss that" and then flame.
why not just go with the flow of the discussion and answer questions posed to you and then pose some of your own?
:cool:
Yeah that's it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Farangrakthai
Not you asking a series of increasingly irrelevant and pointless questions.
Because you're asking questions that have either already been answered - you literally quoted the answer to one question before you asked it - or that are completely pointless and irrelevant. That's why.Quote:
Originally Posted by Farangrakthai
Because you literally quoted the answer to the question before you asked it.
well, do you think i know what you think about this, too (i don't):
since you agree that writing a nasty note should be aggravated assault, do you agree that it should be a crime on facebook, twitter and teakdoor, too?
Leaving aside the law...
:rofl:
You want an answer to a hyothetical question in an unknown country with unknown laws about a note containing unknown, but "nasty", text.
Why?
Because you still don't know exactly what the note from the OP said, so you can hardly compare like with like.
what's so funny, nervana?
do you imagine the note that was written about "headscraves and muslims" was worse than this?
Quote:
so, ant let's say [a bloke] is on a plane next to some Christian trump supporters and after listening to them praise trump for appointing conservatives to the Supreme Court to support Christian causes
as the plane lands, [a bloke] drops a note on the ground for them: Fuck Jesus, fuck you Christian trump supporters and the rest of you kkk cunts".
the plane lands and [a bloke] is arrested and thinks to himself: fair enough, I deserve to be in handcuffs for what I wrote.
nervana, you really think the anti-headscarves message was worse than this?
Fuck Jesus, fuck you Christian trump supporters and the rest of you kkk cunts".
if not, what are you talking about, pray tell?
ok, you and ant wish to just talk about what happened in the op.
fair enough.
i wish to discuss whether what he did should be illegal (in any country) and whether it should apply to t.d. (like it says it some laws):
nervana, i understand, you only want to discuss whether what the guy did was illegal in the uk (same as ant):
though:
since you agree that writing a nasty note should be aggravated assault, do you agree that it should be a crime on facebook, twitter and teakdoor, too?
---------------
Aggravated harassment in the second degree, a Class A misdemeanor, occurs when a person intentionally acts to harass, threaten, annoy or alarm another person, using a telephone, telegraph, the mail or any form of written communication, including electronic means.
What you really want to know is if there should be such a thing in law (anywhere in the world) as "aggravated assault". It appears you don't. Start a thread in Speakers Corner and put your question to a wider audience. Include a poll for even more feedback.
no this thread is for this:
only you and ant are strongly saying that "fuck jesus/allah", etc. should put people in jail.
though, both of you are afraid to say whether that should extend to the internet, like td:
Aggravated harassment in the second degree, a Class A misdemeanor, occurs when a person intentionally acts to harass, threaten, annoy or alarm another person, using a telephone, telegraph, the mail or any form of written communication, including electronic means.