"The Washington Times" Disagrees with you but still who are they in comparison to yours and other "super brains" on TDMichelle Obama's hotel suite: $8,400 a night
"The Washington Times" Disagrees with you but still who are they in comparison to yours and other "super brains" on TDMichelle Obama's hotel suite: $8,400 a night
I'm surprised no ones mentioned the Cambridges tour of New Zealand and Australia yet.
They seem to be having fun, and the natives like them.
I wonder if they stopped for a pint in that pub where Ant and wassissname were supposted to meet over Xmas.
Any reason to believe Michele's holidays are more expensive to taxpayers than other women in similar positions?
I can't remember what the OP was about. Can you tell me in 20 words.
The National Enquirer does not deal in truth. They can't even deal with the gray areas. They publish only the obviously absurd.
So I take it you have read the article and construed that there is not a word of truth in the whole article then? this link is just another of the many which says quite categorically that there is a certain amount of fact in the Article in the OP
Michelle Obama spending sprees with taxpayer money continue - National Republican | Examiner.com
![]()
Me no argue wid piwi and his undeniable troot.
Oh FFS.Originally Posted by piwanoi
I do NOT CARE. :tosser:
because I have made comment about your dishonest debating tactics.Originally Posted by piwanoi
Really? , were have they been "dishonest" ? I have posted over a dozen articles which more or less agree with the article in the OP ,all you can do is play to the gallery seeking crumbs of comfort from your other brain dead mates whilst finding endless excuses for not answering a simple question![]()
Not one of them relating to the OP title regarding the Obama divorce.Originally Posted by piwanoi
Originally Posted by piwanoi
Do you believe bthis republican website is likely to print favourable stories about the democrat presidents wife?Originally Posted by piwanoi
Unless you are a gofernment accountant, how can you be sure the stories you quote about her spending are accurate.
Jourtnalists are well known for their lack of integrity. Politicians are well known for their lack of integrity. You have married a politician and a biased journalist and expect people to follow your lack of logic and inteligence.
You continually demonstrate the credibility of a Thai educated monkey. That's not an insult unless you are a Thai monkey.
Heart of Gold and a Knob of butter.
Obviously Moped man ,everything we read in the "Daily Mail" which you do not agree with is a load of bollocks eh? ,even though you yourself have no way of discrediting it with any evidence to the contrary , I would suggest your undoubted latent talents are wasting here in TD, not when you can get a mega paying job with such like as Reuters spreading the truth to the masses![]()
What a clown, do you think that the Demo's will come out in print and say anything favorable about the republicans ? just in case you are not aware there is nothing more nasty than a political war between opposing political party's , this of course happens World wide , not just in America were Specialist people are paid mega sums to dig shit up against the opposition before a General Election , or are you denying this too?
![]()
Hey Chass ,you will be informing me next that when the "Daily mail" reported quite a few years ago that "BILLY BLOW JOB" was suspected "having it off" in the Oval office with Monica Lewinsky that oweing to its was coming from "The Mail" there was not a figment of truth in it![]()
Here's National Enquirer's competition, Globe, for who can come up with best Obama spat scoop.
Wow! Some serious news there. My condolences.
The OP asked a question, it was answered by most that it was bullshit. Yet the OP is now doing everything in his power to prove that it is a "true" article. Whats the point of the original question?Originally Posted by piwanoi
I thought you had finished debating on this thread calling me some sort of an headbanger ? Getting desperate I see by coming out out with this totally off topic nonsense and quite obviously wanting to play to the gallery to score your "browny points" , why not just address yourself to a simple question , which I will repeat again ,is the whole of the content in the article in my OP devoid of any sense of truth as regards to Michelle's excessive spending of tax payers money on her "Holidays:" abroad? , I await your usual avoiding the question answer , maybe cos of our political differences does it mean that I have no right to challenge your beliefs in the first place ?, do you really believe in the bedrock of democracy, free speech? some how along with quite a few more on TD I highly doubt it , but hey keep them a coming cos the entertainment is priceless![]()

They won't be going to stinkhole Rotorua, the planners of the tour have some standards! However, they will be going to Cambridge where we stayed, maybe they will pop into the Prince Albert pub there. Rotorua is famous for smelly geezers and mongrels, Cambridge is famous for horse breeding and it's trees and looks idyllic. Even we did not go to Rotorua.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)