Thread: I have noticed L/R divisions.

Originally Posted by Rural Surin

Proposed and invented political identities/philosophies tend to be harmful to the soul and character.

The only winner stands to be them.
A social creature is far more developed than of their political counterpart.

Cnuts.

Agreed.
And yet there it is.

I think you've got this one 180 degrees wrong Koojo.

If we were polled about who here expresses the most intolerance, anger and inability to empathise with other people, we would see who came top.

Now, can you please return to your pre-farting practise, and report back with the results.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by Rural Surin

Proposed and invented political identities/philosophies tend to be harmful to the soul and character.

The only winner stands to be them.
A social creature is far more developed than of their political counterpart.

Cnuts.

Agreed.
And yet there it is.

What might be more fascinating to explore or ask, would be how one comes by his/her political philosophies. The intitial process...the origins of political subjectivity/objectivity - regardless of the [very much] instilled archetypal left, right, centre, whatever.

How does one attain their respective political identities, philosophy, or theories.
Is it intuitive of a natural order? Was it spurred from repeated attention?

Much akin to a basic dogma of a religious order...

so far we have concluded that homosexuality is perfectly natural, and that angry response to it is not natural, worse it might be hiding a certain malaise toward normality

Never could understand politics. Who really cares anyway !!!!!!

We seem to have roughly the same number of trashed posts in Issue's from left & right. Naturally there are swings and roundabouts, some 'issue's' the left gets their panties in a twist about, others the right. Of course, those of us that are in the centre of things politically speaking are the model of decorum.

False paradigms, that's all!

^^ And there's fruitfly again' claiming homos are like animals.
That's another thread fruitfly.
Go and have look at the political threads running and tell me who are the ones stomping their feet and shaking their fists and cursing and swearing and who are the onr calmly and rationaly stating their position.
Just have a look.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

so far we have concluded that homosexuality is perfectly natural, and that angry response to it is not natural, worse it might be hiding a certain malaise toward normality

or explains the guilt experienced (and self-loathing) when a Foshan truck drivers' buns makes one's heart race.

I'm saying GENERALLY, not all) generally, more likely to be insulting, abusive, vitriolic and hateful and more likely to use foul language than those on the right, who it seems to me are more likely to be polite, charming and humourous, and able to have a bit of a laugh at things in general and take the piss out of themselves a bit.

Now that's funny. A guy who calls Hispanics spicks in his red comment calls the guy who wouldn't dream of such a thing abusive. Is there some reason you never considered I might be Hispanic? Yeah, we lefties sure do generalize?

So how long have you been making your observations?
Join Date: Mar 2011

Well I'm anti abortion

Oh, so then you're a woman?

Originally Posted by Jesus Jones

False paradigms, that's all!

Not false, but fabricated paradigms.

Perceptions are everything.
A bit like opinions and assholes....everybody has one, yet differ in variety.

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

Originally Posted by Butterfly

so far we have concluded that homosexuality is perfectly natural, and that angry response to it is not natural, worse it might be hiding a certain malaise toward normality

or explains the guilt experienced (and self-loathing) when a Foshan truck drivers' buns makes one's heart race.

indeed, being a closet homo is not normal

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

Originally Posted by Butterfly

so far we have concluded that homosexuality is perfectly natural, and that angry response to it is not natural, worse it might be hiding a certain malaise toward normality

or explains the guilt experienced (and self-loathing) when a Foshan truck drivers' buns makes one's heart race.

indeed, being a closet homo is not normal

...but being in the closet is a Right Wing trait......just look at British Conservative Cabinet Ministers.

Cuj....paying attention to my repo message?

Just as I thought. Didn't even take 40 post to denegrate towards the expected.

You're a sad lot.

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

Originally Posted by Butterfly

so far we have concluded that homosexuality is perfectly natural, and that angry response to it is not natural, worse it might be hiding a certain malaise toward normality

or explains the guilt experienced (and self-loathing) when a Foshan truck drivers' buns makes one's heart race.

indeed, being a closet homo is not normal

...but being in the closet is a Right Wing trait......just look at British Conservative Cabinet Ministers.

always found the irony amusing,

Americans are the same, must be in the family

An Englishman I used to know in HK was the President of a charity that I was involved with. He used to prey on the handicapped recipients of the charitable donations (though there wasn't much money, most used to go on entertaining themselves and drinking claret).

Once he turned up at an event with a Chinese boy who had one arm whom he'd found at 'Riding for the Disabled'. The temerity of the guy ! I resigned from the organisation.

He's as Conservative as you can get, but I , a liberal, found that well beyond the pail.

It doesn't matter how people got there or what they call them or how stoned you are man, but there they are. Left or Right.
Though I must admit it's mostly yanks we're talking about.
How was woodstock by the way RS?

Originally Posted by Koojo

It doesn't matter how people got there or what they call them or how stoned you are man, but there they are. Left or Right.
Though I must admit it's mostly yanks we're talking about.
How was woodstock by the way RS?

I missed that grand event.
The summer of 1969.....? Saigon, jaa.

And there's moog and fruitfly turning another thread gay. FFS.

Originally Posted by The_Ghost_Of_The_Moog

I think you've got this one 180 degrees wrong Koojo.

Originally Posted by Rural Surin

What might be more fascinating to explore or ask, would be how one comes by his/her political philosophies

Originally Posted by Ghost who Walks

Who really cares anyway !!!!!!

Originally Posted by Butterfly

so far we have concluded that homosexuality is perfectly natural, and that angry response to it is not natural, worse it might be hiding a certain malaise toward normality

Originally Posted by Koojo

And there's fruitfly again' claiming homos are like animals

fascinating thread, without any focus at all

Originally Posted by Koojo

Left or Right.

Originally Posted by Koojo

turning another thread gay

and you are trying to catlogue everyone into your suspect boxes

why does everyone have to be left or right, are there no centrists, or a little bit left or right, and closet homos, what are they?

Andy to the rescue!

^^ Good point. Goes as a window to what ever is left of Mojo's mind. You know once we're settled into some idiotic belief so deeply we can only accept and keep the company of those who share our beliefs one's intelligence decreases exponentially. And if you want to generalize my observations of the recent shift in the GOP to the right edge of The Bible just shows how unintelligent they are or how badly they've reckoned the stupidity of their audience.

There's a news bleep on Yahoo about Mitt's wife and how she's reacting to the comments she's never worked a day in her life. Her response: "My career choice was to be a mother and I think all of us need to know we need to respect choices women make," Romney said.

Now isn't that rich! Women should be allowed to make choices for themselves, coming from the wife of the God Squad's Commander in Chief.

You see Bama's wife is cool, she has a personality and an advanced degree and a likable popular First Lady .. she's an attractive humanoid. Ann is an idiot, Palin is an idiot, Bachman is an idiot, the list is endless.

Originally Posted by Camel Toe

You see Bama's wife is cool, she has a personality and an advanced degree and a likable popular First Lady ..

don't say that - it gets boonmee excited and after that it is hard to coax him back to his cage when it is time for his nap

She doesn't give me wood. Something more like one of those hot salami sticks you find at the 7/11.