So at the moment it’s Norwich vs Ipswich in the play offs.
So at the moment it’s Norwich vs Ipswich in the play offs.
Just curious... is the W pronounced in Ipswich? Or is it silent, like in Greenwich?
Why do some English names have a silent W, like Warwick (Earl of Warwick - I've watched some historical dramas, lol), Greenwich, etc?
I've seen a vid about the H being silent in the "ham" towns, like Birmingham, Nottingham, etc.
Maybe the linguists will answer. Thanks...
THE LANGUAGE CLOSET
Life is a learning journey
The silent “w” in some British place names
MAY 14, 2022 / ZUI
In the past couple of Word Bites posts, we have gone over some of the most difficult (more rather, misleading) British place names to pronounce, and how those names originated, and some ideas why the pronunciation changed to strongly deviate from what is written. But today, let’s explore some of the typical patterns in some of these place names, starting off with the more common silent letters.
Compare the pronunciations of Southwark, Warwick, Greenwich, and Alnwick. Spot any patterns?
Yup, the “w”, or for the case of Warwick, the second “w”, is silent. It is a rather noticeable pattern across many British place names especially across England.
However, things are not quite so straightforward. Exceptions, where the “w” is pronounced, include places like Ipswich, Sandwich, and Middlewich. While this pattern tends to be quite common, some people still advice listening to the local residents on the pronunciation, as these changes in pronunciations over time are more localised.
But why does the silent “w” occur in the places that do?
Many of these place names with silent “w” typically end with the suffix “-wick” or “-wich”. These two generally derive from the same Old English word wic, meaning a dwelling or a fortified place. Over time, sound changes occur, and letters may be altered or dropped entirely in a process called “elision”. Theories to why the “w” was especially dropped included rapid or “lazy” speech, often favouring the path that takes the least “effort” to articulate. However, this effort needed ranges from speaker to speaker, from locality to locality, resulting in a generally recognisable pattern, but with notable exceptions to the supposed “norm”.
Hypotheses about when the “w” ceased to be pronounced here focused right around the 16th century, towards the advent of Early Modern English. However, how we write English was slow to adapt or change. For typical words like “inwards”, duplicate spellings were developed to suit more towards this change, as with the word “innards”, meaning the intestines or guts. This phonological change could explain why we write “answers” but pronounce “ansers” as well.
So this pretty much sums up how the letter “w” came to be omitted in some British place names. Of course, this is not a hard and fast rule per se, but it is a rather nice pronunciation pattern we might pick up when travelling around England. This has been a short one, but we will return with yet another pattern you might notice about some other British place names.
Related
Word Bites — Beaulieu, Woolfardisworthy, and other wacky British place names
December 25, 2021
In "Word Bites"
Word Bites — More notorious British place names to pronounce
January 29, 2022
In "Word Bites"
Word Bites
BRITISH, BRITISH PLACE NAMES, ELISION, ENGLAND, ENGLISH, ETYMOLOGY, HISTORY, LANGUAGE, LANGUAGE LEARNING, LANGUAGES, LINGUISTICS, PATTERN, PLACE NAMES, PRONUNCIATION, SILENT LETTERS, SOUNDS, WORDS, WRITING
^thanks, Tax! Very interesting.
Re: Warwick, pronunciation is different in the UK vs USA. Earl of Warwick (warrick) vs Dione Warwick (the singer). They pronounce the W in Dione Warwick.
Also in the "ham" towns. They don't pronounce the H in the UK, while they do in the US. There's a Birmingham town in Alabama and I've heard ppl there pronounce the H in "ham".
Anyhoo, carry on with the footie, lads!
^ these words can have dialectal differences in the UK so once you introduce other nations, accents, etc it can be all over the place. Also, words change with time and trends. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong at all with Tax's article, just that there's layers to it. I just generally go with whatever the people say who are from that area - sometimes that fits exactly with rules and prescriptions, sometimes not...
As for Norwich - fuk 'em.
I never expected Ipswich to finish in the top 2 (or three), but there's still a long way to go in this season. I'm not sure that Norwich will finish in the playoffs although they still have to play us at their shitty little ground and have a good chance of taking points off us.
Ipswich are nowhere near ready for the Premier League, imho.
Cycling should be banned!!!
Once visited a small place in South Australia called Cockburn.
Apparently 'ck' is silent down there.
^ You once got cockburn from a small Aussie? It happens...
A nice win. Expected to an extent, but you never really know and it's nice to keep a rare clean sheet and boost the goal difference (more needed there...).
The league table will likely to and fro until the end of the season, so no predictions from me...
Bristol City are on a terrible run just when they needed a strong run.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)