Oh dear. Hit the nerve then, you russian fucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
Printable View
Oh dear. Hit the nerve then, you russian fucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
^
Must be a different strain.
Calgary always refers to the PADites and Amart.
no not at all, Its because I don't read minds and for the life of me, I haven't got a clue what you are trying to say here:Quote:
Originally Posted by nostromoOh dear. Hit the nerve then, you russian fucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
I will accept that "Fuck off to towel head country" means "please go and live in the middle east" as for the rest fuck knows what was going through your mind. thc? hence the reference to Calgary.Quote:
Surely you want to nuke as in religious war, Singapore and Australia. Now these countries might have different agenda. Fuck off to towelhead country,
As you posted to the thread, I do assume you did want us to understand what you were saying
As I said, you, russian fucker, with no regard to human rights- to cut it short, we will track you down and you will be in the brig for the rest of your bloody haircutQuote:
Originally Posted by hazzno not at all, Its because I don't read minds and for the life of me, I haven't got a clue what you are trying to say here:Quote:
Originally Posted by nostromoOh dear. Hit the nerve then, you russian fucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
I will accept that "Fuck off to towel head country" means "please go and live in the middle east" as for the rest fuck knows what was going through your mind. thc? hence the reference to Calgary.Quote:
Surely you want to nuke as in religious war, Singapore and Australia. Now these countries might have different agenda. Fuck off to towelhead country,
As you posted to the thread, I do assume you did want us to understand what you were saying
It's not. He's now convinced himself, through self-hynotic suggestion, that any ditty from Cal is automatically classified as spam. Mantra.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom SawyerWhy is that spam?Quote:
Originally Posted by aging one
Why yes! Yes it is! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rural Surin
Do they know you are missing??Quote:
Originally Posted by nostromoAs I said, you, russian fucker, with no regard to human rights- to cut it short, we will track you down and you will be in the brig for the rest of your bloody haircutQuote:
Originally Posted by hazzno not at all, Its because I don't read minds and for the life of me, I haven't got a clue what you are trying to say here:Quote:
Originally Posted by nostromoOh dear. Hit the nerve then, you russian fucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
I will accept that "Fuck off to towel head country" means "please go and live in the middle east" as for the rest fuck knows what was going through your mind. thc? hence the reference to Calgary.Quote:
Surely you want to nuke as in religious war, Singapore and Australia. Now these countries might have different agenda. Fuck off to towelhead country,
As you posted to the thread, I do assume you did want us to understand what you were saying
If you please, I and (theres censorhip thank you) that I would be happy with it.
I'm with hazz now.
What the fuck are you trying to say?
Why would you care, I'm once it's translated it'll be just as shite.....
Something I could not say.
pro King actually, he is a good man
Reminds me of "1066 and all That" 1066 and All That - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaQuote:
Originally Posted by nostromo
Quote:
With the ascension of Charles I to the throne we come at last to the Central Period of English History (not to be confused with the Middle Ages, of course), consisting in the utterly memorable Struggle between the Cavaliers (Wrong but Wromantic) and the Roundheads (Right but Repulsive) ...
For a long time before the Civil War, however, Charles had been quarrelling with the Roundheads about what was right. Charles explained that there was a doctrine called the Divine Right of Kings, which said that:
(a) He was King, and that was right.
(b) Kings were divine, and that was right.
(c) Kings were right, and that was right.
(d) Everything was all right.
But so determined were the Roundheads that all this was all wrong that they drew up a Petition called the Petition of Right to show in more detail which things were wrong. This Petition said:
(a) That it was wrong for anyone to be put to death more than once for the same offence.
(b) Habeas Corpus, which meant that it was wrong if people were put in prison except for some reason, and that people who had been mutilated by the King, such as Prynne, who had often had his ears cut off, should always be allowed to keep their bodies.
(c) That Charles's memorable methods of getting money, such as Rummage and Scroungeage, were wrong.
Ha! Have another look at your own post BC..Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobcock
:)
Got your point, but times are changing.oh hell euro is sinking 1.36Quote:
Originally Posted by DrB0bReminds me of "1066 and all That" 1066 and All That - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaQuote:
Originally Posted by nostromo
Quote:
With the ascension of Charles I to the throne we come at last to the Central Period of English History (not to be confused with the Middle Ages, of course), consisting in the utterly memorable Struggle between the Cavaliers (Wrong but Wromantic) and the Roundheads (Right but Repulsive) ...
For a long time before the Civil War, however, Charles had been quarrelling with the Roundheads about what was right. Charles explained that there was a doctrine called the Divine Right of Kings, which said that:
(a) He was King, and that was right.
(b) Kings were divine, and that was right.
(c) Kings were right, and that was right.
(d) Everything was all right.
But so determined were the Roundheads that all this was all wrong that they drew up a Petition called the Petition of Right to show in more detail which things were wrong. This Petition said:
(a) That it was wrong for anyone to be put to death more than once for the same offence.
(b) Habeas Corpus, which meant that it was wrong if people were put in prison except for some reason, and that people who had been mutilated by the King, such as Prynne, who had often had his ears cut off, should always be allowed to keep their bodies.
(c) That Charles's memorable methods of getting money, such as Rummage and Scroungeage, were wrong.
NQuote:
Originally Posted by nostromoGot your point, but times are changing.oh hell euro is sinking 1.36Quote:
Originally Posted by DrB0bReminds me of "1066 and all That" 1066 and All That - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaQuote:
Originally Posted by nostromo
Quote:
With the ascension of Charles I to the throne we come at last to the Central Period of English History (not to be confused with the Middle Ages, of course), consisting in the utterly memorable Struggle between the Cavaliers (Wrong but Wromantic) and the Roundheads (Right but Repulsive) ...
For a long time before the Civil War, however, Charles had been quarrelling with the Roundheads about what was right. Charles explained that there was a doctrine called the Divine Right of Kings, which said that:
(a) He was King, and that was right.
(b) Kings were divine, and that was right.
(c) Kings were right, and that was right.
(d) Everything was all right.
But so determined were the Roundheads that all this was all wrong that they drew up a Petition called the Petition of Right to show in more detail which things were wrong. This Petition said:
(a) That it was wrong for anyone to be put to death more than once for the same offence.
(b) Habeas Corpus, which meant that it was wrong if people were put in prison except for some reason, and that people who had been mutilated by the King, such as Prynne, who had often had his ears cut off, should always be allowed to keep their bodies.
(c) That Charles's memorable methods of getting money, such as Rummage and Scroungeage, were wrong.
Now i did actually hedge that...
all for just saying I don't know what your talking about:confused: I suppose it would be the spanish inquisition if I had actually said something offensiveQuote:
Originally Posted by nostromo
Yeah, what else can you say! He's a good man.Quote:
Originally Posted by nostromo
I cannot understand why the obvious flood control measure has not been implemented.:)
That would be to direct the floodwater to the westish of BKK, takin out a few targets along the way, and then on down south to cleanse them constituencies down there of all that dem garbage.
They're going to open the gates to the central Bangkok canals, which have obviously been closed to this point in the next day or two. Yingluck was just on TV (Ch3) I only saw the end of it, so not sure what she said - but I assume it was to reconfirm the Th/Fr/Mon holiday to keep the streets clear of traffic. It's about to get interesting for central Bangkok.
She said flooding is inevitable and if the barriers break at high-tide, Bangkok faces between 10cm and 1.5 meters of flooding, depending on where you are. And she suggested praying. Her delivery was awful. I don't know if she's tired, freaked out or what, but it was hardly Churchillian.
Sorry for the large size but this map shows BKK elevation.
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2011/10/3399.jpg
Thanks Mobs00 - excellent. (edit)
^ It's there on the right but you may need a bigger screen.
āļĢāļđāđāļŠāļđāđ flood ep.1: āļĢāļđāđāļāļąāļāļāđāļģāļāđāļ§āļĄāđāļŦāđāļ Ąāļēāļāļāļķāđāļ - YouTube
Uploaded by roosuflood on Oct 25, 2011
[I suggest non-Thai speakers watch full-screen on YouTube so as to follow the English subtitles]