Thread: Abhisit Vejjajiva has been invited to deliver a speech on good governance

So, Calgary is either a troll, or he's just another common conspiracy theorist.

Let me guess -- he lives somewhere in "rural Thailand"?

Let me guess again -- he comes from a "humble background" (and when asked about it, will refuse to reply)?

Let me guess again -- his education is another question he won't respond to?

Let me guess again - ditto about his medication (which he stopped to take on his own, because he "feels much better and needs no drugs")

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

I would not be surprised if a good number of the 90 victims were actually shot by the Red gunmen...

That kind of idiocy tell me you are not an ordinary Poster.

Only the hardest core PADite would come up with stuff like that.

I can speculate about who you are.

You are despicable to me.

I will no longer expose myself to your kind.

I am very thankful Teakdoor has the "ignore' feature.

Really? I'm a PADite? Gee, maybe you could share with the class who you think I am?

Go on.

Oh, right, you pretend to ignore me. Suuuure.

I'd say, suggest to up your meds.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

who you think I am?

I'd like to know who you are Duck

So go one, tell me who you are then

You can't argue with that

^^ Welcome to the Calgary's ignore list. It's an exclusive club.

If he adds SD & Mid, we might finally be rid of him as he will have no one left to respond to.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

would not be surprised if a good number of the 90 victims were actually shot by the Red gunmen...

Oh Dear, what a shocking thing to say, just confirms you as a credibility duckegg.

Of course nothing to back it up as usual, just hiding behind the keyboard, and most likely pissed again back on holiday with the lad, the lads.

Made that Redshirt gunmen bit up to did you

Nobody else gives a fcuck who you are Duck, but do let me know who you are , then I'll introduce you to a few redshirt women, the Redshirt gunmen won't be necessary in your sad little case.


You can't argue with that

Originally Posted by sabang

...These circumstances are ripe for an outcome potentially much worse than the actual UDD demonstrations and subsequent 'crackdown', not that I am trying to make light of that...

I assume that outcome that was "potentially much worse than the actual UDD demonstrations and subsequent crackdown'" was the elections in 9 months that were offered 3 times during the 2010 protest?

TH

Originally Posted by Thaihome

I assume that outcome

You 'assume' incorrectly then- but I 'assume' you already know that.
Violent civil war, insurrection etc are the outcomes I was referring to, obviously.
A ridiculous possibility to be gambling with, between corrupt cabals that have the most to lose.

Originally Posted by sabang

Originally Posted by Thaihome

I assume that outcome

You 'assume' incorrectly then- but I 'assume' you already know that.
Violent civil war, insurrection etc are the outcomes I was referring to, obviously.
A ridiculous possibility to be gambling with, between corrupt cabals that have the most to lose.

No, I don't know that. What you spout is pure nonsense and I suspect you do so only for trolling purposes.

TH

Originally Posted by Calgary

It was recovering what had been stolen from them....That is not exactly a 'gain'.

Oh I dunno, I don't think they ever had it in the first place.

Originally Posted by LooseBowels

then I'll introduce you to a few redshirt women, the Redshirt gunmen won't be necessary in your sad little case.

and how would you do that....invite him to Manchester to meet Nong Ning from the local take away?

^^^ What you spout is pure partisan propaganda TH, but that is well enough known.
'Tis your 'team' arguing against and attempting to defy record electoral majorities in a democracy, which I consider akin to farting against thunder.

So, let me get this straight. - Calgary, Sabang and DrBob are the typical and very common type of conspiracy-spouting loons ("invisible hand" and all that secret information that only *they* are privy to, of course), quickly ignoring anyone's comments but their own bleating.

I'm ignoring Loose Bowels in this list, who, just like Butterfly, is just another opportunistic troll, hoping to sidetrack a thread...

Originally Posted by Gerbil

^^ Welcome to the Calgary's ignore list. It's an exclusive club.

If he adds SD & Mid, we might finally be rid of him as he will have no one left to respond to.

We should be so lucky - I would love to hear his theory on who he thinks I am, PADdite, no less. Maybe I can be Sondhi, .. or Spartacus..

To lump DrBob and sabang with Calgary is quite honestly cruel.

Calgary should be together with Loose Bowels and recognise as trolls, good trolls, but trolls none the less.

Originally Posted by Bobcock

To lump DrBob and sabang with Calgary is quite honestly cruel.

How could infantile petulance be considered cruel Bob? Closer to the truth to say pointing this out is cruel.
No invisible hand was behind the two record electoral majorities in the history of Thailand Ct. Or am I being 'cruel'?

Originally Posted by Bobcock

To lump DrBob and sabang with Calgary is quite honestly cruel.

How so? Please explain how they allegedly differ? I only see different intensities of the same confused obstinence.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Please explain how they allegedly differ?

Please explain where you learnt to read.

Uhmmm... one is a troll and the other to are intelligent.

Whether you agree with what they post or not, the difference between them and their methods of getting their point across are light years apart.

Originally Posted by Bobcock

Whether you agree with what they post or not, the difference between them and their methods of getting their point across are light years apart.

Mmmm... Okay, I'll agree with you that their methods of communicating differ, albeit their ability to listen and consider opposing arguments and facts do not differ by much, if anything - their response to any counter opinions seems to be the same ridiculing brush-off that we see by other "passionate enthusiasts".

if anything, we can probably agree that Calgary is bat-shit crazy, while DrBob and Sabang are just "passionately blinded and obsessed".

In fact, sabang's reaction to my question to you did not really help make your case.

Originally Posted by Thaihome

Originally Posted by sabang

Originally Posted by Thaihome

I assume that outcome

You 'assume' incorrectly then- but I 'assume' you already know that.
Violent civil war, insurrection etc are the outcomes I was referring to, obviously.
A ridiculous possibility to be gambling with, between corrupt cabals that have the most to lose.

No, I don't know that. What you spout is pure nonsense and I suspect you do so only for trolling purposes.

TH

Why is it that PADites all characterize those who offer alternative opinions as 'trolling'?

I never see that the other way around.

If 'trolling' can be compared to 'shit disturbing or antagonizing', why are only anti-PADite points of view considered such.

An eternal mystery to me.

Originally Posted by Bobcock

Calgary should be together with Loose Bowels and recognise as trolls, good trolls, but trolls none the less

Why is it that PADites all characterize those who offer alternative opinions as 'trolling'?

I never see that the other way around.

If 'trolling' can be compared to 'shit disturbing or antagonizing', why are only anti-PADite points of view considered such.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Nobody asked how the dems and the army benefited

People have repeated asked how the army, the dems, et. al. benefited from sending the army out to kill unarmed protesters; in numerous threads and this one

Originally Posted by Thaihome

What nobody that posts such stuff as you just did has been able to explain is what benefit it was to the government at that time to shoot unarmed protestors in the manner you attempt to portray it. Nor can you answer the question of who really benefited from provoking the Army in to doing so

Originally Posted by DrB0b

True. He can't. That's because answering that question could very possibly result in a hefty prison sentence.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

the question was who REALLY benefited from provoking the army, the answer is the same people who have been using the army to protect and consolidate their power for the last 90 years or so.

See if you were talking about 2009, I would absolutely agree with you. the dems, the army did very well out of this. to the cost of thaksin and the UDD; but at the core of this cost was the small number of deaths, much smaller than what thaksin was expecting when he was giving his interviews during the 2009 protests.

It is clear that a repeat of 2009 would have been in the best interests of the army leadership, the dems and the others. They didn't get this, quite possibly because the person who engineered thaksin's great disappointment in 2009 was amongst the first people to be killed in 2010.

And therein is the question. In what way would ordering the army to go and disperse the protest killing rampage benefit the army leadership, the dems and the others over dispersing the protest as they did in 2009?

The main result of these martyrs has been a significant empowerment of both the UDD and thaksin who gained a significant stick with they have been using to compromise and beet both the army, the dems and mark ever since. How is that in the interests of the dems, the army leadership, the others?

When this question gets asked, all we get are statements that it is obvious that it was in the interests of the army command and the dems to kill people in 2010 and that any fool can see this. such as the example below

Originally Posted by DrB0b

If you're unable to make that distinction maybe you should get back to scribbling your phone number on toilet walls instead of displaying your ignorance of history and politics on here.

What you and nobody else seems to be able to do, is explain the logic of this obvious truth. Perhaps you would like to take this opportunity to do so.