Your answer speaks volumesQuote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Please explain...:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by panama hat
Printable View
Your answer speaks volumesQuote:
Originally Posted by Boon MeePlease explain...:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by panama hat
You seem to be confused...as usual...Quote:
Originally Posted by panama hatYour answer speaks volumesQuote:
Originally Posted by Boon MeePlease explain...:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by panama hat
Don't sell Lemonade in the Summer. The ye ol' tradition for kids. The cops will called - and they will shut it down!
Jerry Seinfeld’s Family Lemonade Stand Shut Down By Police On L.I.; Instagram Post Goes Viral
EAST HAMPTON, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) — Jerry Seinfeld recently had to deal with some drama in the Hamptons.
And this drama didn’t have anything to do with awkward situations between George and his girlfriend, or Kramer inadvertently stealing lobsters from a professional trap. This was the real Jerry Seinfeld in 2015 and his wife, Jessica – in a dustup over a lemonade stand.
Jessica Seinfeld posted a photo to Instagram after their son, Julian and two of his friends had their lemonade stand reportedly shut down by East Hampton police back on Tuesday, Aug 18.
The photo shows an East Hampton police squad car in the back, with Jerry Seinfeld, son Julian, and two of his friends identified as Xander and Jaden with their hands jokingly behind their heads.
A neighbor had complained about illegally parked cars, according to the East Hampton Press. Upon arrival, police told the Seinfelds that lemonade stands may not
be operated on village property, the newspaper reported.
“Lemonade dreams crushed by local neighbor, but not before raising lots of money for @loverecycled,” Jessica Schneider wrote in part in the caption for the Instagram photo. “Thanks to all of our customers and big tippers!”
“It’s really pathetic that people would call the cops over this. And it’s even more pathetic that cops shut it down,” another wrote.
But some users made light of the situation. One wrote, “thwarted by Newman again,” referring to Seinfeld’s nemesis played by Wayne Knight on his eponymous show.
The money was raised for Jessica Seinfeld’s “Baby Buggy” charity, the newspaper reported.
The Seinfelds are part-time residents of East Hampton, the newspaper reported.
Jerry Seinfeld?s Family Lemonade Stand Shut Down By Police On L.I. « CBS New York[
Lemonaide stands getting shut down all across America?
WTF, Chuck? The cops have nothing better to do? :confused:
No flaming allowed in this threadQuote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Or any threads for that matter...:DQuote:
Originally Posted by NawtierNo flaming allowed in this threadQuote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Update to the earlier Lemonaide Stand Shutdown:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl0zi2nN1H4
Cops Shutdown Jerry Seinfeld; What's Up with Lemonade Stands? (Nanny of the Month, Aug ‘15)
Ironic that these Lefties are getting a taste of their own medicine, eh? :chitown:
^ In all fairness, Detroit does have to deal with "Devil's Night" every year on the night before Halloween, although shooting as many of the Blacks as possible that engage in this arson ritual is a better solution than banning flame throwers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil%27s_Night
My sincere apology; scratch the word "Blacks" and replace it with "arsonists."
Jaysus.Quote:
Originally Posted by BobR
Wrong thread, Bob. I think you want the 'Police State' one. It's more apropos for facist fantasies about ethnic cleansing. :rolleyes:
Spend a week in Detroit and you will understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Understand a call for summary execution of Black youths?Quote:
Originally Posted by BobR
Yeah, nah I don't think so.
EPA Fines Farmer $16 Million For Building a Pond
His violation? In 2012, Mr. Johnson built a stock pond for his horses and cattle on his 8-acre property in Fort Bridger, Wyoming.
Even though the EPA has no jurisdiction over non-navigable waters and stock ponds are exempt from the CWA.
Andy Johnson, Wyoming farmer, sues EPA over $16M fines over stock pond - Washington Times
Love this Big Government stuff, don't you? :chitown:
and there was me thinking that this might not be booners bollocks after all its sounds very clear cut. except that they are not doing the chap for having a stock pond.... they are doing him for damming a navigable river to fill his pond... something that is the epa's business
There we have have it booners keeps his unblemished recond of getting wrong all the time.
His habit of only reading the title makes him look the fool . . . yet again. At least he could have made the effort of quoting the parts that make it look as though he is right . . . but he relies on people reading his links as often as others bother to read hisQuote:
Originally Posted by hazz
^&^^
You retards learn to read sometime, eh?
Even though the Clean Water Act exempts stock ponds, and Mr. Johnson had obtained the necessary state permits, the EPA ordered him in January 2014 to restore the area to its original condition or accumulate fines of $37,500 a day. Instead, Mr. Johnson hired a lawyer.
yes dear, but if one reads beyond the headline... one discovers that the fine et al is for the dam he put across a river to fill the stock pond.... that dam is not a stock pond and is covered by the epa
you are rather child like in your nievity.
And you're another dim bulb since he got the necessary permits to do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
for the stock pond he did. but he did NOT the have the permits for damming the river
Well, hazz, that's why the dude hired a lawyer so they can sort it out in a legal fashion.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
No he didn't:Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
"[...] Although stock ponds are specifically excluded from the Clean Water Act, the EPA argued that Mr. Johnson had violated federal law by constructing a dam on Six Mile Creek, which runs through his property, in order to fill the stock pond.
The creek is a tributary of the Green River, which is a “navigable, interstate water of the United States,” according to the EPA order.
As a result, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concluded that Mr. Johnson needed a “standard, project-specific CWA permit,” and not just the permits issued by Wyoming, which he had obtained..."
Seriously Booners, how hard is it to actually read the articles that you yourself are posting/linking to.
Well, we'll just have to see what the Courts decide then won't we? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
well you must be right, after all american lawyers are very honest and would never allow a client to waste money fighting a case he will not win.
the chap did two things and only had a permit for one of them. rather like you... he wants to pretend this is all about his pond and not about his damQuote:
Although stock ponds are specifically excluded from the Clean Water Act, the EPA argued that Mr. Johnson had violated federal law by constructing a dam on Six Mile Creek, which runs through his property, in order to fill the stock pond.
We'll just have to wait with baited breath for the Judge's decision then won't we? :)
Mebe he'll go for a jury trial? :rolleyes:
I guess so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
They'll at least consider all relevant facts of the case, not just a selective reading of an article/headline.
Oh dear - you're the dim bulb, BM. Can you not read?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Ah, passing the buck on your lack of reading comprehension.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Here's a tip - posters are now reading past your many posted links - why not just stick to the facts instead of making shit up in the hope of not getting caught out again and again and again