Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Democracy

  1. #1
    I am in Jail
    stroller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-03-2019 @ 09:53 AM
    Location
    out of range
    Posts
    23,025

    Democracy

    1. Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.
    2. A political or social unit that has such a government.
    3. The common people, considered as the primary source of political power.
    4. Majority rule.
    5. The principles of social equality and respect for the individual within a community.
    democracy: Definition and Much More From Answers.com

    Most Western nations have adopted a system of governance which incorporates the principle of indirect democracy, i.e. power through representation.
    The rule of "one equal vote per adult" has not become a generally accepted premise until the mid-20th century.

    The electoral system is a key in assessing how far democracy has been adopted.

    There are one-party socialist states, where the vote is open, it can be monitored who one votes for. -'nuff said already. The former German Democratic Republic was such nation.

    There are two main ways of electing: simple majority voting and proportional voting, as well as combinations of the two.

    The British system is an example of direct vote. The advantage is that people vote for an identified candidate, the downside is that all minority votes are "lost", thus a candidate with an overall approval of merely 30% of votes may win after a 'fortunate' constellation in the voting districts. (sorry my English skills fail me on this subject - I don't quite know the correct terms)

    Australian senate elections are an example for proportional vote. One votes for a party, which has a list of candidates. Canditates are allocated seats according to the overall result. This is very fair in terms of percentage, the disadvantage is one has little influence on which individual candidate one may support.

    Germany is an example for a mixed system, one has a "split-vote", or 2 votes: one for a candiate by direct vote, one for a party through a list vote.

    Further, some countries are constitutional monarchies, where a ruler is the head of the nation with veto power, and s/he commands the army. Thailand is an example.
    There could also be a part of parliament where seats are inherited (the Upper House in the UK) or nominated (Army seats in Thailand).

    Edit:In Republics, there is a central government as well as governments for the individual states, often the combined "power" of the states' governments can block the central gov (Germany).

    As far as I know, the United States of America is the Republic in which the individual states have most autonomy, which is reflected in their unique electoral system.
    I'll let someone else introduce this.
    Last edited by stroller; 27-07-2006 at 10:07 PM.

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat lom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    on my way
    Posts
    11,453
    The Swedish system is similar to the German system, a list vote.
    You can cross over candidates that you don't like , thereby changing the nomination priority that the party had decided.

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    William's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    19-05-2013 @ 06:37 AM
    Location
    In jail
    Posts
    5,822
    If we you ever needed an example of how proportional representation did not work, look no further than Italy

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    Skulldigger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    20-02-2007 @ 09:51 PM
    Location
    Mostly in Northern Thailand.
    Posts
    1,449
    All of the systems have positive and negative sides to them, but from my point of view the UK system seems the most undemocratic in that 'the winner takes all' does not take into account the votes of the minority. It is simply very far from the principle 'one person - one vote'...

    You can argue that it makes for a more stable style of governance though, which has some merit in times of crisis, and if you want to make war on others, which seems to be popular in the US and UK.

  5. #5
    I am in Jail
    stroller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    12-03-2019 @ 09:53 AM
    Location
    out of range
    Posts
    23,025
    ^
    I agree, and in countries with majority voting, the borders of the constituencies are crucial in determining the outcome. Clever rearranging is frequently done by the ruling party before elections.

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat Storekeeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Jomtien
    Posts
    11,943
    Quote Originally Posted by stroller
    Clever rearranging is frequently done by the ruling party before elections.
    I think they call it gerrymandering. The Republicans are definitely guilty of this. If they're stealing elections in the US ... this is how they're doing it. Not that black box or chad BS everybody spouts.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •