Thread: Sarah Palin

Here's an example of how low the Libtards will go to smear Palin:

Doesn't look like the McCain/Pailin "bounce" was temporary. Polls have been solid 2+ points for the last week. All the mud being thrown at Palin don't seem to be sticking, I tink it is backfiring in fact. The meaner the libs get, the more the GOP soldifies it lead.

Amazing the hatred displayed by the libs on this thread, obviously seeing the election slip away is increasing the irrationalibility of the lefties.

Originally Posted by Accidental Ajarn

Amazing the hatred displayed by the libs on this thread, obviously seeing the election slip away is increasing the irrationalibility of the lefties.

Operative phrase of the day...for sure.

^

Well it got me a red from RC, so it must be on the correct track . (That dude is a bit whacked).

RC does seem to be obsessed with hatred (Of what exactly seems to be a moving target). He hates me for some reason, and he hates "conservatives" and GOPs and members of the military, and members of academia, and writers, and economists, and, well others.

He obviously hates Sarah Palin. Why? Who knows? Who can understand a mind filled with hatred of his "enemies?"

Anyway, Sarah seems to remain popular and the vile spewing of the libs is not working. Can Obama regroup? He has more or less bet the farm on two main themes. "Change" and McCain is a Bush clone. Neither theme seems to be winning over independents so far. Can Obama change course or is he forced to keep trying to sell this same bunch of BS?

Seems to be some question as to what exactly the "Bush Docterine" actually means:
washingtonpost.com

The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.

There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different.

If I were in any public foreign policy debate today, and my adversary were to raise the Bush doctrine, both I and the audience would assume -- unless my interlocutor annotated the reference otherwise -- that he was speaking about the grandly proclaimed (and widely attacked) freedom agenda of the Bush administration.

Not the Gibson doctrine of preemption.

Not the "with us or against us" no-neutrality-is-permitted policy of the immediate post-9/11 days.

Not the unilateralism that characterized the pre-9/11 first year of the Bush administration.

I tend to agree that Palin was caught off with that question, but I think she handled the situation rather well.

Originally Posted by Bugs

Seems to be some question as to what exactly the "Bush Docterine" actually means:
washingtonpost.com - nation, world, technology and Washington area news and headlines

The New York Times got it wrong. And Charlie Gibson got it wrong.

There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration -- and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today. It is utterly different.

If I were in any public foreign policy debate today, and my adversary were to raise the Bush doctrine, both I and the audience would assume -- unless my interlocutor annotated the reference otherwise -- that he was speaking about the grandly proclaimed (and widely attacked) freedom agenda of the Bush administration.

Not the Gibson doctrine of preemption.

Not the "with us or against us" no-neutrality-is-permitted policy of the immediate post-9/11 days.

Not the unilateralism that characterized the pre-9/11 first year of the Bush administration.

I tend to agree that Palin was caught off with that question, but I think she handled the situation rather well.

well he presented very vaguely and non specific....intentionally i might add as it appeared to me.. I think she did ok too.. the more i see obama being interviewed or making speeches the more I see him searching for the RIGHT answer instead of his real feelings.. to me he always seems like he is placating everyone and intentionally avoiding positioning himself in any particular camp..

I wish they would drop this palin issue and tell us how he is going to handle the issues at hand when he's in office, maybe she is as good a distraction for them as attention for the reps and that's why it is still so close because he doesn't have to address the real issues directly either while they keep on about this nomination..he's not presenting any solutions...

Originally Posted by blackgang

This kinda straightened it all out for me., Now I kinda know whats going on and what to expect. Reverend Manning's Fierce Prayer For Bristol Palin ATLAH Daily Webcast - Manning Fierce Prayer for Bristol Palin

That was the funniest thing I've seen in a long time..don't agree with his rant but laughed my arse off...maybe we could get him on here to debate our resident Lib Ray

Originally Posted by spiff

(Merkel) speaks Russian fluently. Must be a commie. LOL

So does Condi. And she ain't even a socialst.

Originally Posted by panama hat

There is no substitute for parenting by parents.

Depends on who the parents are. As long as kids know they are truly loved, they get by. Spending time on their own makes them stronger, too. Socialist parents who think they can take time off work coz their kids are depressed or have a cold and "nanny" isn't good enough do injustice to their coworkers and to their kids. Stand on your own two feet.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Charlie Gibson’s interview with Sarah Palin was heavily edited by ABC News

Yep, the screen shift is plain as day.

Originally Posted by Accidental Ajarn

RC does seem to be obsessed with hatred (Of what exactly seems to be a moving target). He hates me for some reason, and he hates "conservatives" and GOPs and members of the military, and members of academia, and writers, and economists, and, well others.

He appears to hate anyone who opposes his views. Unable to debate without attacking emotional/personal issues. Mommy's boy.

Try reading some of your own posts, or of your "friends" a day after when you cooled down.

Pot kettle black.

^ True. After ignoring barrages of personal attacks, fellow posters told me to hit back. Now will once again ignore the leftie simpletons.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Norton

Gov. Palin is in most ways a prototype Republican.

Seems that way. Did a little bit more reading on her (oh ok, so I read her Wiki article!). She's anti-abortion, Christian, opposed to gay marriage (but professes to having 'good gay friends'), increased taxes to oil Co's but is also for opening up further drilling fields in Alaska. And she probably pronounces Iraq with a "k"; sure sign of a Republican.

So all in all a pretty safe choice policy wise then.

My G_D! She actually invokes a Supreme Architect of the Universe! Shame on her! BTW, I-Rak is prounced with a "K"

1. George Washington: "It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible."
2. John Adams: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."
3. Thomas Jefferson: "Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted."
4. Abraham Lincoln: "...I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
5. Franklin D. Roosevelt: "As Americans, we go forward, in the service of our country, by the will of God."
6. John F. Kennedy: "For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago. The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."

thanks to RWN

[quote=Boon Mee;759714]

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Norton

Gov. Palin is in most ways a prototype Republican.

1. George Washington: "It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible."
2. John Adams: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."
3. Thomas Jefferson: "Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted."
4. Abraham Lincoln: "...I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
5. Franklin D. Roosevelt: "As Americans, we go forward, in the service of our country, by the will of God."
6. John F. Kennedy: "For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago. The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God."

thanks to RWN

That is very worrying !!!
Its almost the same as the Islamic leaders say !!!

Also troubling to the Libtards is the fact Palin is an Outdoors Woman! Kills and eats her own food! Forsooth!



Catch Gretchen Wilson too while yer at it!

So the republican moonbats want this to be president

Saturday Night Live - Palin / Hillary Open - Video - NBC.com

Lets face it, in Diplomatic circles she is a country bumpkin.

Yes, much like BO -- the only difference is, she's in the right-hand seat.

I disagree there Tex- with his academic credentials, silky tongue and urbane mannerisms I think Obama would slide in there as smoothly as could be.

In truth, the same effete mannerisms that make an element of the Heartland distrust him.

BO knows he's over his head, fortunately most of the yanks are starting to see it that way. I wouldn't be surprised if McCain wins by a large margin.

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

Saturday Night Live - Palin / Hillary Open - Video - NBC.com

'Boner-Shrinker' . . .


Good stuff, I'd give you a green but you redded me . . .

^ That was a good line. And, hey, we always red each other. I watched that clip a few times coz it made me laugh. The hits on both sides were good.

One of the busiest topics.

Well done, raycarey!