I have not hear Obama talk about this subject in any detail - and that in and of itself is worring to me. Additionally IMHO it tends to be the more liberal lot of judges that go down the judicial activism route - (in recent times there are more than a few conservative leaning folks doing this as well).
This is one of the few rights that can really swing things for me - as the saying goes - pry it from my cold dead hands.....
I am not saying there are no problems with guns in the US - there are. But IMO the problem is lack of enforcement of existing laws. Along those lines I would not fight stricter/stronger gun laws (depending on the law). For example I am all in favor of increased penalties for crimes committed with a gun, and I am not opposed to some forms of waiting lists, and back-ground checks. That being said I am against banning most guns - even assault rifles.
Yes, but I trust McCain more than Obama (longer history on the matter) to actually try and do something about it.
I don't want the federal government to own the houses long-long term. But I would rather see any bail-out funds going directly to keeping people in their homes over keeping big business from loosing too much or going under. Banks and such should go under based upon what they were doing - but we won't run out of banks or people that want to get into banking. There is a real risk that people who loose their homes in this mess will never be home owners again.
I think the government should negotiate new morgage payments, with the understanding that any discount that is offered on the front end (ie droping the monthly payments) gets taken care of on the back end (ie if the home eventually is sold the government is the first one to get a cut of any increase in value - up to the original value of the mortgage). This will allow companies to get out of any/all home mortgages they are involved in (at a discount), it will allow people to keep their homes, and it should allow the government to minimize the cost by giving direct assistant to homeowners.
I would not allow folks that have investment properties to take part in this program. Only one house per person/couple and it would have to be the primary residence.
This would be similar to (but not the same as) the Home Owners' Loan Corp - started in 1933, stopped giving loans in 1935, and liquidated in '51 - and made a small profit in the process.
This might be the case - but I think another factor in a possible one term for Obama is that it is likely that the blue team will also have a greater control of congress, thus there will really only be one party to accept the blame or pats on the back for what is to come - at least over the next two years, and probably four. There will be no place to hide for the inaction of government that has been a plague on the US for nearly twenty plus years.
I would have been much more in favor of a McCain/Lieberman ticket (over the McCain/Palin ticket), but I do think McCain was running a major risk of turning off the far right and many of them staying home on election day.

