Sinophobia, Inc.
Good saying.
Sinophobia, Inc.
Good saying.
I would be curious to know what chinkystan spends on 'Influencers', if you would care to link it here. Either way, China is fighting fire with fire. I trust that is obvious.
WHOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO it's HOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
WHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATA BOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTW HATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATAB OUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWH ATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABO UTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHATABOUTWHA TABOUTWHATABOUT
No Link, then?
Hardly.
Is China is selling weapons to Florida?
Is China is sending its warships inside Nagastans' 12 mile, sovereign waters?
China has a no first use of nuclear weapons doctrine, has Nagastan?
China has never attacked a foreign country with biological/nuclear weapons, has Nagastan?
....
Last edited by OhOh; 05-10-2021 at 07:45 PM.
Oh, my. The Lemmings are fighting amongst each other...
Senior Chinese diplomat meets US national security advisor
By Xinhua Published: Oct 07, 2021 07:17 AM
"Yang Jiechi, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, met here Wednesday with U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan.
The two sides, in a candid manner, had a comprehensive and in-depth exchange of views on China-U.S. relations as well as international and regional issues of common concern. The meeting was described as constructive, and conducive to enhancing mutual understanding.
The two sides agreed to take action, following the spirit of the phone call between Chinese and U.S. heads-of-state on Sept. 10, strengthen strategic communication, properly manage differences, avoid confrontation and conflict, seek mutual benefit and win-win results, and work together to bring China-U.S. relations back to the right track of sound and steady development.
Yang said that whether China and the United States can handle their relations well bears on the fundamental interests of the two countries and two peoples, as well as the future of the world.
When China and the United States cooperate, the two countries and the world will benefit; when China and the United States are in confrontation, the two countries and the world will suffer seriously, said Yang, also director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee.
The U.S. side needs to have a deep understanding of the mutually beneficial nature of China-U.S. relations and correctly understand China's domestic and foreign policies and strategic intentions, said Yang, adding that China opposes defining China-U.S. relations as "competitive."
Yang said that China attaches importance to the positive remarks on China-U.S. relations made recently by U.S. President Joe Biden, and China has noticed that the U.S. side said it has no intention to contain China's development, and is not seeking a "new Cold War."
China hopes the U.S. side could adopt a rational and pragmatic China policy, and, together with China, follow a path of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation, with respect for each other's core interests and major concerns.
During the meeting, Yang expounded China's solemn position on issues related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet and human rights as well as on maritime issues, urging the United States to truly respect China's sovereignty, security and development interests, and stop using the above issues to interfere in China's internal affairs.
The U.S. side expressed its adherence to the one-China policy.
The two sides also exchanged views on climate change and regional issues of common concern.
The two sides agreed to maintain regular dialogue and communication on important issues. "
Senior Chinese diplomat meets US national security advisor - Global Times
Jaw Jaw, not War, War.
Last edited by OhOh; 07-10-2021 at 01:48 PM.
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
Slight point of order Hoho- this is not really a "View from China", is it? Rather, News about some government apparatchiks having a meeting.
No worries, SC rarely stays on track.
US photographer captures changes during 3,000-km tour after 27 years
Cycling China
By Global Times Published: Oct 07, 2021 06:13 PM
"Seeing is believing. US photographer and traveler Peter Crosby knows better than anyone, starting his second bike journey of over 3,000 kilometers across China 27 years after his first expedition in 1994.
An eight-episode documentary series Peter Crosby's Biketour to China, which has been aired on streaming platform Xigua Video premiering on September 29, follows his tour witnessing and capturing the tremendous changes and development taken place in China in the last nearly three decades.
In 1994, he took an over 3,000-kilometer bike ride from Beijing to Hong Kong, through provinces including Shanxi, Hubei, Hunan and Guangdong, during which he took 19,400 photos and 80-hour-long video.
According to a Xinhua report, Crosby recalled that the Chinese people who appeared before the lens of his camera in 1994 were the most vivid memories of the experience. "It's amazing to see all those people who let us film and photograph them so up-close and very personally."
It had been a dream for him to be back to China for a second trip, which he was waiting for until 2021. Crosby spent two months on the trip crossing the country in the series produced by Xigua Video, Yunji Media and China Intercontinental Communication Center.
Due to the changes to China's network of roads, the route follows 80 percent of the old route and 20 percent of the new that "Peter Crosby is interested in," according to the documentary series' director Li Jiameng, adding that Crosby kept daily over 10-kilometer riding exercise for the bike tour in the US.
From Beijing Film Academy to Shaolin Temple in Central China's Henan Province, he re-visited these sites and reunited with some old friends. "In order to meet the tight schedule, he had to ride at least four hours every day, which was a challenge," Li told the media.
The documentary series also includes the old videos that Crosby took in 1990s allowing more people to see the changes taken place. Zhang Xin from Xigua Video said that the series not only presents the dream of Peter Crosby, but also brings international audiences a chance to truly know China and the great changes.
The series has been well-received among Chinese audiences, who posted positive reviews on social media platforms with many hoping that international audiences can also get to know China through Peter Crosby's story.
In order to offer a full view of China, the series visits not only cities but also the rural areas from traditional mines and clean energy to infrastructures like highways and bridges, Zhang explained.
"Coming back to China for me was mostly like kind of opening an old box. It's completely different," he said, according to a report by Chinese media shine.cn"
US photographer captures changes during 3,000-km tour after 27 years - Global Times
A link to part of their original 1994:
Belly Of The Dragon (1994)
Belly Of The Dragon (1994) - National GeographicTV Explorer on Vimeo
A link to episode 1 of his return
Return to the Belly of the Dragon - episode 1
Facebook मा लगइन गर्नुहोस्
A link to episode 2 of his return
A link to episode 3 of his return
....
Will war inevitably break out between China and the United States? To some Americans it seems inescapable. This view has been promoted by the American elite over the years, and is still quite popular in the United States. Why?
International relations scholars in the United States and Europe have no doubt expounded and established their thoughts on international relations and foreign policy according to the thoughts of Machiavelli, who believed that there is no altruism or justice. In his famous political treatise, the prince becomes accustomed to doing evil, and is not troubled by being blamed for cruelty. Compassion is dangerous.
American politicians treat China as a rival to a large degree based on their slanted belief in the "Thucydides Trap", a rising power is bound to challenge an existing power, and the existing power is bound to respond to the threat, and war becomes inevitable. This phrase is based on an assertion by Thucydides, the famous Ancient Greek historian, that the war between Sparta and Athens was due to the fear instilled in the established dominant power of Sparta by the rising power of Athens.
Machiavelli famously asserted: "The end justifies the means." Because of this source of thought, western liberalism or western realism are only instrumental. Both have no intention to coexist and compromise with the existing world. Both have the strong exclusivity of religious fundamentalism, both seek the highest purity, or extreme, of theory and practice according to their own logic and ideas. The difference is that pessimistic Western realism insists its own interests and wants to eliminate imaginary opponents and conquer an "uncertain" world by force. Optimistic Western liberalism sees the non-Western world as an "opportunity". Its goal and means are to individualize, fragment and demonize the non-Western world with various "freedoms" of western standards, so that it has no intention or ability to respond to the flow of western capital and the spread of self-centered consciousness.
The biggest problem with America is that Americans don't understand what empathy is and how-to walk-in others' shoes. What they pursue is to impose their ideas and ideology on any other countries that have different ideologies or political systems. America promotes democracy in the world like a doctor prescribing Viagra to all his patients, whether young or old. It acts with a combination of missionary zeal and solipsism -- an inability even to conceive of another way of looking at the world.
Many Americans have a one-sided understanding of China. They need a new understanding of China and the Chinese spirit. The Chinese spirit is the spirit to build the Great Wall. The people who built the Great Wall were definitely not invading, but making the statement, "if you don't invade me, I will never invade you".
Equally, the spiritual pillar of the Chinese nation is represented by a diagram, known as the Taiji. The Taiji diagram is Yin with Yang, Yang with Yin, Yin and Yang grow together. The western way of thinking is a dichotomy of one cut and two halves, The future trend of the world's way of thinking should be one of Yin and Yang, not two. If western civilization is the white hemisphere of the Taiji chart, masculine culture, with strong extroversion, then Chinese culture is the black hemisphere, belonging to the feminine culture, with strong inclusiveness. Chinese culture has white in black. That is to say, Chinese culture can tolerate western civilization. Therefore, western civilization should also tolerate Chinese culture, rather than provoke a "clash of civilizations".
There is only one country today whose growth depends on 70 years of effort, no plundering, no colonization, that depends on the separation of migrant workers' families, on the export of resources of the whole country, on the export of the whole environment, and on how much it costs to change from foreign trade, bit by bit. Accumulated national strength is the reason it is what it is today.
Chinese culture is a heterogeneous culture based on harmony, it treats humanity as a continuity which is a master key to solving the cultural confusion.
China has not portrayed itself as the enemy of the West, but rather the enemy within the West has led to a hostile view of China. That enemy is the West's view of the world.
They misunderstand China in their imagination based on their incorrect recognition of the law of the jungle which refers to natural selection and survival of the fittest. The law of the jungle does not apply to human civilization, which is made up of intelligent creatures, unlike the wild, a competitive primeval forest. In the process of the development of human society, with the continuous improvement of the level of civilization, people do not remain in the state of animals in the jungle. Power is the truth in human society. Even if it exists temporarily, it will not last long. Human society will eventually destroy itself if it follows the law of the jungle.
Chinese culture celebrates the relational values of deference and interdependence. It respects the uniqueness of the particular. It promotes understanding and consensus among different civilizations through equal exchanges. It promotes the common values of mankind through mutual learning. Human beings should work together to build a community with a shared future for all, create a beautiful tapestry of human civilization, and share a harmonious and prosperous global village. The Chinese culture of harmony is not a part of an ideology - it is a moral vision, a way of being in the world. To regard it as a cultural resource is not romanticism, but arises from necessity. Although it has been ignored for a couple of hundreds of years, this culture of China deserves its place at the table. It has a lot to offer and is going to make a difference in the world.
The international community has to get past the ideology of individualism. We have to take responsibility for not only thinking of ourselves, but for what we mean for other actors who share the world in which we live. If your neighbor does better, you do better. It is that simple. The world is interdependent; it is is organic; we are all in play at the same time.
The author is Non-Resident Research Fellow, Global Engagement Academy, Shandong University (Weihai) China; Associate professor, School of Foreign languages , Nanjing University of Finance and Economics. Pu Jingxin@126.com
US views China as an enemy based on a slanted world view - Global Times
Food for thought.
[QUOTE=OhOh;4316165]Hardly.
Is China is selling weapons to Florida?
No. Only to any tin pot dictatorship that wants them
Is China is sending its warships inside Nagastans' 12 mile, sovereign waters?
No but is threatening Taiwan with fly overs and threating Phillipine fisherman far from its own territorial watersand building military runways on reefs which is against international law.
I could go on but the post would then rival a Leo Tolstoy novel.
China has a no first use of nuclear weapons doctrine, has Nagastan?
China has proved time and again agreements signed on paper mean nothing to them. EG trade agreement with Australia. One country two systems agreement. Two of many examples.
China has never attacked a foreign country with biological/nuclear weapons, has Nagastan?
No but it has invaded and taken over Tibet and has spread a virus killing millions with an outcome as bad as a biological weapon and then threatened and placed trade sanctions on Australia just for asking for an enquiry into the source of the Virus that has cost the world billions of dollars and plunged millions into more poverty, all the time obfuscating "it came from australian meat imports/ american soldiers" etc etc. Then left it to the west to find a decent vaccine for China's virus, whilst coming up with one that is as good as most of the shit they make.
Oh Oh, you and your Chinese propaganda mates are sounding more and more like John Cleese, "what have the Romans (west) ever done for us?"
Last edited by Hugh Cow; 08-10-2021 at 12:11 PM.
FTFY. Maybe it's a Gorilla thang.USA has proved time and again agreements signed on paper mean nothing to them.
Oh Oh is teaching you well. It is sad to see a poster formerly with credibility talking like someone from the CCP and has now lost all his credibility with anyone other than Oh oh and his mini me Klon. There is no view from China. Noone is allowed to have a view other than Xi. Did you forget the first doctor to report covid was arrested?
It is very sad an otherwise rational person such as yourself Hugh is so easily turned loony by this manufactured china derangement syndrome.
Do you want me to insult your intelligence by providing you with a list of the various treaties and agreements the US has reneged upon in recent history?
Which is why I opine "maybe it's a gorilla thang". But I am sure the US has done way more reneging than China in the current century. Way more.
Feckin' hongkies. They're mekkin' out like bandits.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)