Why do people post crap articles like this??
An elderly person passing wind?That is shocking!!
What is more shocking though is Camilla publicly talking about it. Which of course she didn't.
I am willing to bet the Paper making the claim is Rightist paper.
What I like to see Is a Leftist paper making the claim that Camilla replied by also passing wind. LOL
I would love to be present at the press conference where she denies it.
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
It was originally tied with the BBB Act (don't know what that is ), which was supposed to be voted through a the same time.
It wasn't and AOC and her.....Squad has little trust that it will be, in its originally form.
Clever girl
Someone here will be able to explain it to me
The $1.2 trillion bill that passed is known as BIF (Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework). Include investment in roads, bridges, water qualaty and internet.
The $1.75 trillion social spending bill, dubbed the Build Back Better Act (BBB) did not recieve a vote. Contained funding for early childhood care and education and for fighting climate change, as well as key health care reforms. Will be voted on later this month and is going to be a tough one to pass. Figure will end up far less than $1.7 trillion. Progressives want this one bad and majority moderate Dems want as well but findind a single Republican vote will be near impossible.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"
Yep and from what I've read the moderate democrats say they'll still vote for it at a later date — just want to see the full numbers, costed by the CBO.
Then, of course — the senate: Will the parliamentarian allow the bill to be passed under budget reconciliation (allows a simple majority to pass legislation) and will Manchin/Sinema be on board.
A steep hill to climb, as it were.
Last edited by Samuel; 08-11-2021 at 04:29 PM.
No — as you may know, in the US, the Senate is considered the deliberative and prestigious chamber where consensus is normally required (60 votes) to pass a bill — unless it is budget-related, undergoes a "Byrd bath" and can then pass with a simple majority under reconciliation.
So it's still got to be approved by the senate? Then why the hell is everyone talking like it's a done deal?
Why do you always sound like an angry guy living in his parents' basement? oh wait.
Unlike BIF (Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework) which received Republican support and passed with a vote of 69-30 in the senate — the Buildback Better bill will not get any Republican votes and as discussed already on this thread, Dems hope the parliamentarian will allow them to pass it under reconciliation (51 votes needed).
That's unlikely to happen with the way the bill has been written in the house.
The Washington Post doesn't seem to agree with you that the bill's passing is a sure thing, BSnub:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-po...spending-deal/
With infrastructure victory in hand, Democrats brace for next battle over $2 trillion spending bill
Infrastructure deal gave new life to Democrats, but major hurdles await as centrists and liberals remain wary of each other.
Manchin is not the sole obstacle in the chamber, where concerns linger among a wider community of lawmakers. Even Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the architect of the original $3.5 trillion spending blueprint, has taken issue with the House-drafted bill for the way it handles state and local taxes — restoring a deduction, he has said, that amounts to an “absurd and hypocritical” tax break for higher-income earners.
But an even tougher test may not come from any senator at all. To pass their package in the narrowly divided chamber, where Democrats have only a tiebreaking advantage, the party has opted to rely on a process known as reconciliation. It allows them to avoid a GOP filibuster, but it carries strict rules that limit the measure to proposals with clear budgetary effects.
To stay within the confines of reconciliation, Democrats have to craft their proposal carefully and survive scrutiny from the chamber’s parliamentarian. Otherwise, entire portions of the bill could be struck — a prospect that looms especially large over the party’s plans to try to address immigration in the so-called Build Back Better Act. The newly revised House bill would allow the government to “parole” undocumented immigrants by giving them five-year work permits that shield them from deportation. The Senate’s rulekeeper previously has advised Democrats against including some immigration policies in the package.
Last edited by Samuel; 09-11-2021 at 05:11 PM.
You really are projecting with that dumb right-wing stereotype, but you are an idiot and not creative at all, so that is not a surprise.
Nice to see you cherry-picking from an article when it is clearly just pointing out obstacles the bill faces, all of which can be overcome. The article never states that the bill will not pass.
As usual posting disingenuous misleading distortions. Your posts are a waste of time to read.
Well, you seem more certain than Dick Durbin, the senate majority whip.
You seem to be reading my posts — a day after saying you won't.Durbin: 'I don't know' if Manchin will vote for Build Back Better
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois told Yahoo News, “I don’t know,” whether Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., will provide the crucial 50th vote for Build Back Better, President Biden’s signature budget bill, on Saturday.
“I don’t know the answer to that,” Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, said when asked if the Senate would muster the votes to pass the hotly contested legislation. “First, we have to get it through the parliamentarian’s office and through 50 Democratic senators.”
Yet, you have a strange compulsion to reply to them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)