Thread: President Donald Trump

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by RPETER65

What exactly was posting that link supposed to prove?

Proves nothing except that anyone can keep up with his Twitter feed and see what he puts up there. Decide on their own if what he is doing is calculated or off the cuff.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It is pretty clear misskit is having many kittens today, on the eve of a great historical inauguration

The eve of this historical inauguration will be the 19th of this month. In spite of what you think, I am not very concerned about Trump's presidency.

What I am concerned about is the high tension between the USA and Russia.

We will know soon enough what is in the intelligence report and what Trump has to say about what he will be told tomorrow.

You keep wondering whether he knows what he is doing and he will continue to do what he has been doing - winning.

If you are worried about tension with Russia look no further that obybye and clunkton, and actually the rnc too. Tensions are natural between nations, but these guys are deliberately ratcheting up the tension to prevent any kind of rapprochement between trump and Putin; it is transparent, they are also trying to delgitimise trump with the same aim in mind.

The social revolution has happenned!

Right under the noses of the libtard press, they didn't see it coming, and still by in large cannot admit it actually happenned.

They simply cannot fathom that the Donald's tweets, were a carefully crafted strategy, they never took him seriously.

Some lefty libtards are realizing that they should be ignoring Trump's tweeting twaddle, but it is too late, that horse left the barn long ago.
The Donald doesn't need the media anylonger. (Even though he still owns them with every tweet)

The people have spoken! The revolution set to take off in earnest.

Meanwhile the media herd of cattle are bellowing the rather weak an unsubstaciated Russian hacker infferences.
We can now close the book on "Dan Rather" journalism, they've been Trumped.

Trump's staff gave a statement after his security meeting yesterday. He seems to admit there was hacking and points out there was no effect on the election.


“I had a constructive meeting and conversation with the leaders of the Intelligence Community this afternoon. I have tremendous respect for the work and service done by the men and women of this community to our great nation.

“While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines. There were attempts to hack the Republican National Committee, but the RNC had strong hacking defenses and the hackers were unsuccessful.

“Whether it is our government, organizations, associations or businesses we need to aggressively combat and stop cyberattacks. I will appoint a team to give me a plan within 90 days of taking office. The methods, tools and tactics we use to keep America safe should not be a public discussion that will benefit those who seek to do us harm. Two weeks from today I will take the oath of office and America’s safety and security will be my number one priority.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/06/us...-briefing.html

Originally Posted by misskit

He seems to admit there was hacking and points out there was no effect on the election.

He seems to be moving in the direction of accepting it. Taking a middle ground short of complete acceptance. The only thing that matters to him about all this is that it is an affront to his ego. He will be a failure as president. A total disgrace.

Originally Posted by Humbert

The only thing that matters to him about all this is that it is an affront to his ego.

Exactly.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

If someone wants to talk business then ya talk turkey on the Donald's terms and get on with it.

Somewhat different to the incumbent, who dithered, waffled and pussy-footed around for about two years before giving the thumbs down to the XL pipeline...

With Donald, it will be.....So ya need a pipeline huh...OK, how long, how much is it gonna cost us?.........OK when can you start laying the pipe.... Oh and BTW, can you guys build walls too?

NEXT.....

The Trump pres-attempt is in shambles.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.6d18a3a813d6

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by Humbert

The only thing that matters to him about all this is that it is an affront to his ego.

Exactly.

Exactly how many kittens are you going to have today, precious darling?

On this glorious eve of the Donald Trump inauguration, a super historic event marking one of the momentous turning points in USA and global history.

Seems like there will be an awful lot of homeless kittens, very sad indeed!

not surprisingly, it appears earl has taken the role of TD's head trumptard.

Well Boon isn't here to rub your nose in it... so someone has to

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by Humbert

The only thing that matters to him about all this is that it is an affront to his ego.

Exactly.

You 2 dweebs are an affront to anyone with a functioning brain. There has always been hacking, this is not even news.

Please go away and let the adults discuss things.

Originally Posted by thailazer

The Trump pres-attempt is in shambles.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.6d18a3a813d6

So says the WaahPoo whose main job is to disseminate fake news about Trump and the Russians.

^ Should we rely on RT from now on?

Or another? Alex Jones, maybe?

He is very popular as well.


This article originally appeared on Media Matters.
There are lots of ways the political press continues to normalize President-elect Donald Trump’s often radical behavior. From regurgitating his vague tweets as news while he refuses to grant press conferences, to shying away from calling the serial prevaricator a liar, journalists continue to play nice.

Here’s another way Trump’s getting the benefit of the doubt: He’s a wildly unpopular political figure, yet the press continues to gloss over that fact while granting him soft coverage.
In terms of polling data, there’s virtually no good news for Trump. The results generally point in the same direction: He’s widely disliked and inspires little confidence in his presidential abilities.
This stands in stark contrast with characteristically stronger bipartisan approval for presidents-elect in recent decades. For instance, in 2008, “50 percent of John McCain’s voters approved of Barack Obama’s handling of his presidential transition,” noted an NBC News report. And as NPR reported, “Even after a prolonged recount and Supreme Court decision, George W. Bush received 29 percent approval from Democrats in 2001.” This is 14 percentage points higher than the same Pew statistic for Trump.
Trump’s contrast with Obama in late 2008 is stunning: Obama entered 2009 with a 68 percent favorable rating. Today, Trump’s favorable rating stands at an anemic 43 percent. And if history is any indication, that rating is almost certain to go down once the new president takes office.
A plurality of Americans think he will be a “poor” or “terrible” president. His cabinet picks enjoy historically little support, and 54 percent of adults say they’re either “uncertain (25 percent) or pessimistic and worried (29 percent) about how Trump will perform during his presidency.” Meanwhile, 68 percent would describe the president-elect as “hard to like,” and less than half of Americans are confident in Trump’s ability to handle an international crisis.
Those numbers are off-the-charts awful for an American president-elect. On average, 71 percent of Americans were confident that Presidents Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton could handle an international crisis, when polled after each was newly elected. Today, just 46 percent are confident about Trump’s ability to handle such a crisis.

Originally Posted by Humbert

He seems to be moving in the direction of accepting it. Taking a middle ground short of complete acceptance.

The problem he has now is that presidents tend to acquire a track record, for better or for worse. He'll actually have to deal with the people whose competence he questions.

His previous MO of gobbing off so often that there's too much to bother holding him accountable for is no longer going to work.

It'll be interesting to see just how much he backtracks on...I see the wall is already going to be paid for by Mexico at some unspecified point in the future after construction.

Originally Posted by aging one

He is very popular as well.


This article originally appeared on Media Matters.
There are lots of ways the political press continues to normalize President-elect Donald Trump’s often radical behavior. From regurgitating his vague tweets as news while he refuses to grant press conferences, to shying away from calling the serial prevaricator a liar, journalists continue to play nice.

Here’s another way Trump’s getting the benefit of the doubt: He’s a wildly unpopular political figure, yet the press continues to gloss over that fact while granting him soft coverage.
In terms of polling data, there’s virtually no good news for Trump. The results generally point in the same direction: He’s widely disliked and inspires little confidence in his presidential abilities.
This stands in stark contrast with characteristically stronger bipartisan approval for presidents-elect in recent decades. For instance, in 2008, “50 percent of John McCain’s voters approved of Barack Obama’s handling of his presidential transition,” noted an NBC News report. And as NPR reported, “Even after a prolonged recount and Supreme Court decision, George W. Bush received 29 percent approval from Democrats in 2001.” This is 14 percentage points higher than the same Pew statistic for Trump.
Trump’s contrast with Obama in late 2008 is stunning: Obama entered 2009 with a 68 percent favorable rating. Today, Trump’s favorable rating stands at an anemic 43 percent. And if history is any indication, that rating is almost certain to go down once the new president takes office.
A plurality of Americans think he will be a “poor” or “terrible” president. His cabinet picks enjoy historically little support, and 54 percent of adults say they’re either “uncertain (25 percent) or pessimistic and worried (29 percent) about how Trump will perform during his presidency.” Meanwhile, 68 percent would describe the president-elect as “hard to like,” and less than half of Americans are confident in Trump’s ability to handle an international crisis.
Those numbers are off-the-charts awful for an American president-elect. On average, 71 percent of Americans were confident that Presidents Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton could handle an international crisis, when polled after each was newly elected. Today, just 46 percent are confident about Trump’s ability to handle such a crisis.

Almost exactly the same kind of absolute bullshit rhetoric we heard leading up to the election, you believed that bullshit and now this baloney,.
Sorry AO but ya really are appearing to one of the clueless ones.
Welcome to the club of, snubtard, dumbert, and little miss is having kittens.

Originally Posted by aging one

He is very popular as well.


This article originally appeared on Media Matters.

Trump’s contrast with Obama in late 2008 is stunning: Obama entered 2009 with a 68 percent favorable rating. Today, Trump’s favorable rating stands at an anemic 43 percent. And if history is any indication, that rating is almost certain to go down once the new president takes office.

Want to make a bet on it?

^ I don't know who said the chinese protesting trump's twitter feed is fake news, perhaps its you who twisted what was said to you.

The chinese might be annoyed, but its doesnt mean he is stupid, nor does it mean evrything he does is perfect.

As for the rest, your mind is closed, you will be living in sadness until you die.

Originally Posted by longway

As for the rest, your mind is closed, you will be living in sadness until you die.

The latest list of crybabies; politicaly appointed US Ambassadors, fired, out by January 20!

President-elect Donald Trump has fired,effective Inauguration Day January 20, every U.S. ambassador politically appointed by President Barack Obama, according to a report published Thursday night by the New York Times.

The Times reports the State Department sent out a notice on December 23 informing the ambassadors of Trump’s order. The move sent shock waves through the diplomatic corps as some ambassadors in previous transitions had been given time to leave their post for personal convenience.

Trump Fires All Obama Politically Appointed Ambassadors Effective Inauguration Day

There's a new sheriff in town, and he ain't taking no politicaly appointed/annointed bullshit.

I told you he is a killer, he is going to take them down one by one

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

told you he is a killer

I was thinking child molester but he may be both now that I think about it.