Thread: President Donald Trump

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Call it what you want, it is about keeping bad people (with bad intentions) out of country!

Thank fuck Trump finally did it too! Every president in history never thought to do the same thing because they all, every one of the 44 previous presidents hated America so much that that they wanted Americans to die. Fucking legacy presidents should be shot then gang raped by rabid monkeys for allowing people with bad intentions into our country.

Even the arrival declaration form on arrival here asks "Do you have bad intentions?" and did you fill out the form in good faith (not that Muslims have a faith, just ask Trump).

Thank God in heaven Trump is here to finally keep bad people out of the country!

apparently, melania wishes to remain in ny (maybe permanently) while trump will go "home" on the weekends, like during the campaign.

video of melania looking at barron at 21 seconds is lovely:

First Lady Melania Trump May Never Move Into the White House - Us Weekly

so, what do y'all think about ivanka playing the more traditional first lady role?

she's been called a dumb blonde by some, but, IMO, she's quite wise and will be a good influence on trump.

apparently, she wants to focus on legislation for family issues (traditionally the democrat's issues).

I tell ye something, America hasn't entertained the world this much since the TV series "Dallas" The screwing Eweings of Texas ain't as classy as this new soap.
Gotta love it.

Watching America implode... priceless.

or maybe we're all being played and it's hegelian (even though he didn't come up with it):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis...sis,_synthesis

a beginning proposition called a thesis, (2) a negation of that thesis called the antithesis, and (3) a synthesis whereby the two conflicting ideas are reconciled to form a new proposition.[3]

Originally Posted by CSFFan

During the campaign...

In Trump's defense, it was a campaign promise he's kept. There's no doubt about that....

same with trump fulfilling his promise to put up a "strict constitutionalitst" to the supreme court which brought him massive votes from the evangelical community and people like jerry farewll jr. (whose support was HUGE).

1944.. Wallace should have been on the ticket, Trueman got in instead. The Cold War began and US arms manufacturer's made the fortunes that put them where they are today....

A blame game doesn't detract from the fact that Americans voted in a president that is wholly representative of the nation.

A totally fucking clueless sheep with a gun.
Stupid and dangerous.

bye bye USA

Originally Posted by Neo

Originally Posted by Farangrakthai

those documents were written in the late 90s and the neocons had success as they pulled the wool over both the brits and yanks eyes.

A blame game doesn't detract from the fact that Americans voted in a president that is wholly representative of the nation.

yes, but look at my quote and remember that trump took the piss out of jeb bush for supporting the iraq war and saying that dubya protected america when actually america was attacked under dubya's watch (that's when i gained a bit of respect for trump, t.b.h.).

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The bottom line is that Bannon shoved this in front of Trump

During the campaign...

In Trump's defense, it was a campaign promise he's kept. There's no doubt about that....

And who was bragging to his mates in 2015 that he was already Trump's campaign manager...

(Now we sit and watch the wheels slowly turn.....)

What does this make it? Trump now 0 – 6.

Using sweeping, unambiguous language, U.S. District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. on Tuesday night granted a temporary restraining order against the executive order Trump signed late last week.

It looks like him. Can anyone confirm if this is real?

https://www.facebook.com/CREDO/video...unseen-section

^ Looks and sounds like Bannon.


Will we be invading Mexico now?

President Trump Threatens to Send U.S. Troops to Mexico to Take Care of 'Bad Hombres'

(WASHINGTON) — President Donald Trump threatened in a phone call with his Mexican counterpart to send U.S. troops to stop "bad hombres down there" unless the Mexican military does more to control them itself, according to an excerpt of a transcript of the conversation obtained by The Associated Press.
The excerpt of the call did not make clear who exactly Trump considered "bad hombres," — drug cartels, immigrants, or both — or the tone and context of the remark, made in a Friday morning phone call between the leaders. It also did not contain Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto's response.
Still, the excerpt offers a rare and striking look at how the new president is conducting diplomacy behind closed doors. Trump's remark suggest he is using the same tough and blunt talk with world leaders that he used to rally crowds on the campaign trail.

A White House spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.

more Donald Trump Threatens to Send U.S. Troops to Mexico | Time.com

^A lot of undiplomatic rhetoric comic out of the regime. His clueless base loves it though.

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The bottom line is that Bannon shoved this in front of Trump

During the campaign...

In Trump's defense, it was a campaign promise he's kept. There's no doubt about that....

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

However, he not only ignored legal counsel, but deliberately avoided running it past the affected departments.

Hence the shitstorm and the legal challenge.

Or really any consul outside of Bannon's and Trump's voice Stephen Miller.

Stephen Miller: From campaign hype-man to Oval Office influence - CNNPolitics.com

That's what Trump is giving America....

And Rudy Giuliani

report this ad
HOMESUBSCRIBE
BIG GOVERNMENTBIG JOURNALISMBIG HOLLYWOODNATIONAL SECURITYTECHVIDEOSPORTSTHE WIRESBREITBART LONDONBREITBART JERUSALEMBREITBART TEXASBREITBART CALIFORNIASTORE
Facebook
Twitter
RSS

SHOP NOW >
Ann Coulter: Give Me Your Tired Arguments…
80
6
Coulter
by ANN COULTER1 Feb 2017433
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER


Everything said about President Trump’s “Muslim ban” is a lie — including that it’s a Muslim ban.
The New York Times wore out its thesaurus denouncing the order: “cruelty … injury … suffering … bigoted, cowardly, self-defeating … breathtaking … inflammatory … callousness and indifference” — and that’s from a single editorial!

Amid the hysteria over this prudent pause in refugee admissions from seven countries whose principal export is dynamite vests, it has been indignantly claimed that it’s illegal for our immigration policies to discriminate on the basis of religion.

This is often said by journalists who are only in America because of immigration policies that discriminated on the basis of religion.

For much of the last half-century, Soviet Jews were given nearly automatic entry to the U.S. as “refugees.” Entering as a refugee confers all sorts of benefits unavailable to other immigrants, including loads of welfare programs, health insurance, job placement services, English language classes, and the opportunity to apply for U.S. citizenship after only five years.

Most important, though, Soviet Jews were not required to satisfy the United Nations definition of a “refugee,” to wit: someone fleeing persecution based on race, religion or national origin. They just had to prove they were Jewish.

This may have been good policy, but let’s not pretend the Jewish exception was not based on religion.

If a temporary pause on refugee admissions from seven majority-Muslim countries constitutes “targeting” Muslims, then our immigration policy “targeted” Christians for discrimination for about 30 years.

Never heard a peep from the ACLU about religious discrimination back then!

According to the considered opinion of the Cato Institute’s David J. Bier, writing in the New York Times, Trump’s executive order is “illegal” because the 1965 immigration act “banned all discrimination against immigrants on the basis of national origin.”

In 1966, one year after the 1965 immigration act, immigrants from Cuba suddenly got special immigration privileges. In 1986, immigrants from Ireland did. People from Vietnam and Indochina got special immigration rights for 20 years after the end of the Vietnam War.

The 1965 law, quite obviously, did not prohibit discrimination based on national origin. (I was wondering why the Times would sully its pages with the legal opinion of a Grove City College B.A., like Bier! Any “expert” in a storm, I guess.)

In fact, ethnic discrimination is practically the hallmark of America’s immigration policy — in addition to our perverse obsession with admitting the entire Third World.

Commenting on these ethnic boondoggles back in 1996, Sen. Orrin Hatch said: “We have made a mockery” of refugee law, “because of politics and pressure.” We let in one ethnic group out of compassion, then they form an ethnic power bloc to demand that all their fellow countrymen be let in, too.

As the former Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, described “diversity” in Der Spiegel: “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.”

That’s our immigration policy — plus a healthy dose of Emma Lazarus’ insane idea that all countries of the world should send their losers to us. (Thanks, Emma!)

Americans are weary of taking in these pricey Third World immigrants, who show their gratitude by periodically erupting in maniacal violence — in, for example, San Bernardino, Orlando, New York City, Fort Hood, Boston, Chattanooga, Bowling Green and St. Cloud.

The Muslim immigrants currently being showcased by the left are not likely to change any minds. The Times could produce only 11 cases of temporarily blocked immigrants that the newspaper would even dare mention. (Imagine what the others are like!)

For purposes of argument, I will accept the Times’ glowing descriptions of these Muslim immigrants as brilliant scientists on the verge of curing cancer. (Two of the Times’ 11 cases actually involved cancer researchers.)

Point one: If the Times thinks that brilliance is a desirable characteristic in an immigrant, why can’t we demand that of all our immigrants?

To the contrary! Our immigration policy is more likely to turn away the brilliant scientist — in order to make room for an Afghani goat herder, whose kid runs a coffee stand until deciding to bomb the New York City subway one day. (That was Najibullah Zazi, my featured “Immigrant of the Week,” on May 1, 2012.)

Point two: I happened to notice that even the stellar Muslim immigrants dug up by the Times seem to bring a lot of elderly and sickly relatives with them. Guess who gets to support them?

House Speaker Paul Ryan’s driving obsession (besides being the Koch brothers’ lickspittle) is “entitlement reform,” i.e., cutting benefits or raising the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare.

I have another idea. How about we stop bringing in immigrants who immediately access government programs, who bring in elderly parents who immediately access government programs, or who run vast criminal enterprises, stealing millions of dollars from government programs? (I illustrated the popularity of government scams with immigrants in Adios, America! by culling all the news stories about these crimes over a one-month period and listing the perps’ names.)

Point three: Contrary to emotional blather about the horrors refugees are fleeing, a lot are just coming to visit their kids or to get free health care. One of the Times’ baby seals — an Iraqi with diabetes and “a respiratory ailment” — was returning from performing his responsibilities as an elected official in Kirkuk.

That’s not exactly fleeing the Holocaust.

While it’s fantastic news that most Muslim refugees aren’t terrorists, the downside is: They’re not refugees, they’re not brilliant, they don’t have a constitutional right to come here, and they’re very, very expensive. Until politicians can give us more government services for less money, they need to stop bringing in the poor of the world on our dime.



Ann Coulter: Give Me Your Tired Arguments...

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Trump is here to finally keep bad people out of the country!

I hope he keeps the bad people in the country too. Governments of civilised countries should be frenetically drawing up a questionnaire for wannabe American entrants.

First question being "Are you a Trump supporter?".
Second question "Do you have a God given right to carry a gun?".
Third question- "Are you serving US military?"

Every nation owes a duty to it's Citizens to keep out undesirables.

"Trump administration 'officially putting Iran on notice', says Michael Flynn"

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...lynn-on-notice

Amateur hour again. Becoming routine with this administration. "On notice". WTF does that mean? Sounds like my first grade teacher scolding me after I dipped Mary Schmid's pigtail in the ink well.

Originally Posted by Norton

"On notice". WTF does that mean?

If you take the time to read the whole article, there are a few clues. ....but in plain English it would likely mean......If you are going to keep doing this shit, we are going to take action against you....be warned....or something along those lines.

Trump put the entire world "on notice" that he intended to place restrictions on migration from certain countries.....and is now being blasted for not advising them before he implemented the restrictions, leaving a few people stuck in airports for a day or so. Seems they did not take him seriously.

Maybe Iran will pay a bit more attention now that he has demonstrated that "on notice" means he might actually do something. They are not used to that.

Just guessing of course....after all, according to some elements in the frantic news media, just yesterday he was going to start a war with China; today he is going to invade Mexico and he has insulted the Aussie PM.....tomorrow??

Somebody is leaking White House transcripts.

However, this is a **BS alert**

Here is Trump Telling Mexico's Enrique Pena Nieto about using the US military as the Cartels are in the US and it's true the Mexico has not or can not deal with this alone.

But Mexico denies this, Nieto's response is not included and this could be **fake **news.



Trump to Mexico: Take care of 'bad hombres' or US might

By VIVIAN SALAMA
20 minutes ago, February 2, 2017

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump threatened in a phone call with his Mexican counterpart to send U.S. troops to stop "bad hombres down there" unless the Mexican military does more to control them, according to an excerpt of a transcript of the conversation obtained by The Associated Press.

The excerpt of the call did not detail who exactly Trump considered "bad hombres," nor did it make clear the tone and context of the remark, made in a Friday morning phone call between the leaders. It also did not contain Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto's response. Mexico denies that Trump made the threat.

Still, the excerpt offers a rare and striking look at how the new president is conducting diplomacy behind closed doors. Trump's remarks suggest he is using the same tough and blunt talk with world leaders that he used to rally crowds on the campaign trail.


A White House spokesman did not respond to requests for comment. The Mexican Foreign Relations Department told The AP: "The negative statements you refer to did not occur during said telephone call. On the contrary, the tone was constructive."

The phone call between the leaders was intended to patch things up between the new president and his ally. The two have had a series of public spats over Trump's determination to have Mexico pay for the planned border wall, something Mexico steadfastly refuses to agree to.

"You have a bunch of bad hombres down there," Trump told Pena Nieto, according to the excerpt given to AP. "You aren't doing enough to stop them. I think your military is scared. Our military isn't, so I just might send them down to take care of it."

A person with access to the official transcript of the phone call provided only that portion of the conversation to The Associated Press. The person gave it on condition of anonymity because the administration did not make the details of the call public.

The Mexican website Aristegui Noticias on Tuesday published a similar account of the phone call, based on the reporting of journalist Dolia Estevez. The report described Trump as humiliating Pena Nieto in a confrontational conversation.

Mexico's foreign relations department denied that account, saying it "is based on absolute falsehoods."

Americans may recognize Trump's signature bombast in the comments, but the remarks may carry more weight in Mexico.

Political analyst and former presidential spokesman Ruben Aguilar notes Pena Nieto had enjoyed an apparent spike in his low approval levels, as Mexicans rallied around him for publicly challenging Trump in the border wall dispute.

The latest remarks could undercut that, if Pena Nieto is viewed as "weak," he said.

Trump has used the phrase "bad hombres" before. In an October presidential debate, he vowed to get rid the U.S. of "drug lords" and "bad people."


"We have some bad hombres here, and we're going to get them out," he said. The phrase ricocheted on social media with Trump opponents saying he was denigrating immigrants.

Trump's comment was in line with the new administration's bullish stance on foreign policy matters in general, and the president's willingness to break long-standing norms around the globe.

Before his inauguration, Trump spoke to the president of Taiwan, breaking long-standing U.S. policy and irritating China. His temporary ban on refugees and travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries, aimed at reviewing screening procedures to lessen the threat of extremist attacks, has caused consternation around the world.

But nothing has created the level of bickering as the border wall, a centerpiece of his campaign. Mexico has consistently said it would not pay for the wall and opposes it. Before the phone call, Pena Nieto canceled a planned visit to the United States.

The fresh fight with Mexico last week arose over trade as the White House proposed a 20 percent tax on imports from the key U.S. ally to finance the wall after Pena Nieto abruptly scrapped his Jan. 31 trip to Washington.

The U.S. and Mexico conduct some $1.6 billion a day in cross-border trade, and cooperate on everything from migration to anti-drug enforcement to major environmental issues.

Trump tasked his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner — a real estate executive with no foreign policy experience — with managing the ongoing dispute, according to an administration official with knowledge of the call.

At a press conference with British Prime Minister Theresa May last week, Trump described his call with Pena Nieto as "friendly."

In a statement, the White House said the two leaders acknowledged their "clear and very public differences" and agreed to work through the immigration disagreement as part of broader discussions on the relationship between their countries.

https://apnews.com/0b3f5db59b2e4aa78cdbbf008f27fb49

Originally Posted by Farangrakthai

apparently, melania wishes to remain in ny

Allegedly the white house water, from the golden fountains, leaves a bad taste in her mouth and is difficult to remove the carpet stains.

Originally Posted by OhOh

Isn't that POTUSE through and through. Everyone can take his sloppy outbursts as they "guess".

Of course. Outside of the inner circle it's all guessing based on "information" or "reports" from "sources" that are often questionable at best. Then we have the "interpretations" of every utterance made, spinning right and left depending on who is doing the interpretation.

We have the super-hyped "Muslim ban" which does not actually ban most of the worlds Muslims at all. We have the imminent invasion of Mexico now, because of some words supposedly spoken in a two way phone chat.

Trump bashing is in high gear and every flicker of his eye will bring forth new threats as the doomsday clock ticks away the final days of life on earth. No doubt all of Iran is on high alert and Mexican troops are digging in along the border.....

Early Trump is like early Duterte was...you tune in just to see what impossibly stupid thing he has said or done while you were sleeping. Superb entertainment!