Thread: President Donald Trump

^^ ok. Here goes.

Oh yes it is.

^ I thought it was real, it was you dummies who convinced me it was not possible.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Bring him down,as how?

Remember Watergate?

Your kidding
of course,even you cannot be this stupid

Originally Posted by Humbert

Remember Watergate?

Talk about living in liberal lalaland, sheezzers!

Winding up the liberal lemming press over some inconsequential inaugural facts hardly constitutes criminal behavior.

Whereas inciting violence and sedition against a duly elected government is a crime.

Threatenning the President and his familly is a crime.

Yet the liberal press panders these acts of violence and rioting as legitimate protest.

Wrong!

Waky waky Dumbert this is not "war criminal" tricky Dickey, or LBJ who bombed the fuck out of Cambodia and Laos.
That was nearly 50 years ago!

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by koman

Naturally, the wall is on everybody's complaint list because it's nice and simple.....

Funny, you and your pals were saying the Wall was just a metaphor a couple of months ago, congratulating yourselves on how clever you were. Now it looks like he is serious, like we thought, and you are congratulating yourselves because he is filling his campaign promise. The hypocrisy of you lemmings is mind blowing.

Just a couple of months ago you were laughing at Trumpie; telling yourself and everyone else that he was a joke and could not possibly win the election.....gloating over the poll results showing Clinton way ahead..... Then you started predicting that he would not do any of the things he talked about in the campaign, and that his cabinet appointments were going to get shot down....and..... on and on.

FFS, if this guy doubled the GDP and unemployment was down to 1% in six months....you would still be complaining.....probably about something really important like his dancing or taste in window coverings......

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Threatenning the President and his familly is a crime.

if you are a seppo in the united states of drumpfland

have you thought about attending drumpf university ?

I saw this and it gave me a laugh...not that a similar idea had crossed my mind....
Someone Bought AlternativeFacts.com and Is Oddly Redirecting Traffic to NYT's Story | Adweek

Now it's going to an even better site....

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Remember Watergate? Talk about living in liberal lalaland, sheezzers!
Winding up the liberal lemming press over some inconsequential inaugural facts hardly constitutes criminal behavior.

Things to come.
The man's character or lack of it is set in stone. A habitual liar.
He will stumble and fall that is a certainty.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Remember Watergate? Talk about living in liberal lalaland, sheezzers!
Winding up the liberal lemming press over some inconsequential inaugural facts hardly constitutes criminal behavior.

Things to come.
The man's character or lack of it is set in stone. A habitual liar.
He will stumble and fall that is a certainty.

If he does no big deal, the Supreme Court will be set to be conservative for the foreseeable future and Pence is a more than qualified backup.

Originally Posted by koman

Then you started predicting that he would not do any of the things he talked about in the campaign

Please, koman, I tolerate a lot of your lies but this one is laughable. It was you and your cult who said that we should take Trump figuratively instead of literally and you ridiculed us for believing him.

I am a bit disappointed that Trump is following on all his campaign promises

Originally Posted by RPETER65

A: Anyone who isn't a complete fucking moron. First of all it is yet to be seen how the wall will end up being payed for

So the liar in chief and congress will appropriate 20 billion dollars to build a wall with no plan for how Mexico will reimburse the US? The fiscally conservative Republican congress will take that kind of risk? How stupid you Trumpites are.

Originally Posted by Humbert

for believing him.

Shouldn't we be able to believe the president? When the president says he lost the popular vote due to voter fraud, then shouldn't the president be putting up evidence to back up his claim?

Trump said he saw 1 to 1.5 million people on the mall...pictures show he's wrong.

Amongst us here on TD, we ask for links and explanation. Shouldn't the president be forced to prove his declarations of illegal actions? Shouldn't he be held to the same level of scrutiny as student who tells his teacher the dog ate his homework, again?

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Amongst us here on TD, we ask for links and explanation. Shouldn't the president be forced to prove his declarations of illegal actions? Shouldn't he be held to the same level of scrutiny as student who tells his teacher the dog ate his homework, again?

Obama's birth certificate was forged.
Ted Cruz's father was part of a plot to kill JFK.
Thousands of Muslims celebrated in NJ over 9/11.
Five million votes in the election were fraudulent and they were all Democratic.
Etc. Etc. Etc.

He's a habitual liar.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Remember Watergate? Talk about living in liberal lalaland, sheezzers!
Winding up the liberal lemming press over some inconsequential inaugural facts hardly constitutes criminal behavior.

Things to come.
The man's character or lack of it is set in stone. A habitual liar.
He will stumble and fall that is a certainty.

I just realized where you're getting this from, Matt Bai, yahoo news!



You will just run off the cliff with the rest of the libtard lemmings.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-wil...100041553.html

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

I just realized where you're getting this from, Matt Bai, yahoo news!

No, never heard of him. I think it's pretty obvious where we are headed with Drumpf.

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by koman

Then you started predicting that he would not do any of the things he talked about in the campaign

Please, koman, I tolerate a lot of your lies but this one is laughable. It was you and your cult who said that we should take Trump figuratively instead of literally and you ridiculed us for believing him.

Bullshit.....did you think that applied to everything he said?..... something like "draining the swamp" was supposed to be taken literally?....like he was actually going to drain a fucking swamp.....that's what we were talking about.

On opening up NAFTA....yes that could be taken literally because it's a clear statement of intent, and easily doable. Nearly everything that is said in an election campaign is subject to a range of interpretations, so stop waffling and calling people liars. So far you have managed to get just about everything wrong and you just get more and more pissed off about it.

The trick in this kind of game is to be able to recognize the difference between simple and colorful campaign rhetoric and actual statements of intent. Clearly you can't tell the difference....which at this stage should not be a surprise to anybody.

Originally Posted by koman

and actual statements of intent.

Could you please give us examples?

Originally Posted by koman

The trick in this kind of game is to be able to recognize the difference between simple and colorful campaign rhetoric and actual statements of intent. Clearly you can't tell the difference....which at this stage should not be a surprise to anybody.

And how did you characterize the Wall a few weeks ago?

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Originally Posted by koman

and actual statements of intent.

Could you please give us examples?

I just did....don't you read the post you respond to before asking questions like this? NAFTA...reopen= statement of intent....

Originally Posted by koman

I just did....don't you read the post you respond to before asking questions like this? NAFTA...reopen= statement of intent....

Aren't treaties approved by the Senate? They're law, aren't they?

He can state intent....but let's face it, it's just intent.

If Americans had anything about them they should be using this opportunity to start up new credible political parties to break the 2 party stranglehold, will never be a better opportunity. As a basically closed 2 party system is hardly a great advert for democracy.

The building the fence and keystone pipeline executive "orders" are nothing more than BS.

Originally Posted by Liar

"When they do the Keystone Pipeline -- I want it approved, I want all those jobs -- I like a lot of oil flow, because right now we're low."

And here's what the announcement that Trump would re-open the process looked like in a presidential memo issued this week:

Sec. 2. Invitation to Submit an Application. I hereby invite TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. (TransCanada), to promptly re-submit its application to the Department of State for a Presidential permit for the construction and operation of the Keystone XL Pipeline, a major pipeline for the importation of petroleum from Canada to the United States.

Can't presidents issue pipeline permits?

Originally Posted by DoucheBagInChief

"I will build a great wall -- and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me -- and I'll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words."

In the executive order Trump signed on Wednesday, he delivered the following, rather soberer instructions to the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security:

(a) In accordance with existing law, including the Secure Fence Act and IIRIRA, take all appropriate steps to immediately plan, design, and construct a physical wall along the southern border, using appropriate materials and technology to most effectively achieve complete operational control of the southern border;

(b) Identify and, to the extent permitted by law, allocate all sources of Federal funds for the planning, designing, and constructing of a physical wall along the southern border;

(c) Project and develop long-term funding requirements for the wall, including preparing Congressional budget requests for the current and upcoming fiscal years; and

(d) Produce a comprehensive study of the security of the southern border, to be completed within 180 days of this order, that shall include the current state of southern border security, all geophysical and topographical aspects of the southern border, the availability of Federal and State resources necessary to achieve complete operational control of the southern border, and a strategy to obtain and maintain complete operational control of the southern border.


So what his "executive" orders seem to be nothing more than bullshit.

Originally Posted by CSFFan

Originally Posted by koman

I just did....don't you read the post you respond to before asking questions like this? NAFTA...reopen= statement of intent....

Aren't treaties approved by the Senate? They're law, aren't they?

He can state intent....but let's face it, it's just intent.

koman doesn't understand the american political process. he's repeatedly shown that he knows less about the US constitution than trump, and that's no small feat.

he's good at making hockey metahphors, though.