Thread: What Will It Take To Get Rid Of ISIS?

Originally Posted by raycarey

access to education (for males and females) modern health care, and legitimate economic opportunity.

A bit lie Afghanistan prior to the USA getting involved there. A bit like Iraq. A bit like Syria. A bit like Libya. A bit like Iran still is today.

Hmm YES USA USA USA Way to go. Bloody idiot Ray.

Originally Posted by Dapper

America created the taliban.

Then they created Al CIAda.

And then they created ISIS.

Not fucking rocket science folks.

OK, Tony Blair helped out. The filthy fucking Judas.

Yup - that's about the size of it.

Stop ISIS? Stop the Axis of Evil and take our countries back. Simples.... except here comes the fools like harry, ant etc to go Yeah but yeah but like the rest of the corporate media loving fools

Originally Posted by OhOh

Does the UN as a whole decide the list or do the UNSC? Does the UN as a whole overrule the UNSC in this matter?

Even if it got that far America would Veto it to protect their pet terrorists, and Israel would insist on it being vetoed as well... Never going to happen.

Originally Posted by OhOh

I$I$

ftfy

Originally Posted by OhOh

Once the Genie has escaped the bottle, it becomes very difficult to put the Genie back in.

Which is why I asked if the UN general Assembly overides the UNSC and whether anybody has a veto over the UNGA's decisions.

Even if a discussion is started outside the UN, some will define a list of what constitutes a terrorist. The list must include any entity "assisting" the terrorists.

For example the I$S$ terrorists lleged "leaders" were attacked in Syria, even though the terrorist activity took place in France and Belgium , were organised, armed and staffed by "locals" living and working in those countries.

seems odd really - going all that way. Especially as all France and Belgium had done was recognize the state of Palestine. Weird that ISIS should travel to another continent to get all angry on them. Also strange how ISIS used to be ISIL until the people realised that the L stood for LEVANT which includes Israel, and if people were to believe they actually wanted an Islamic state, the first place would attack would be rogue criminal jewish state Israel. But they never have! Very weird.

Why haven't ISIS attacked Israel? The Americans and Saudis have given them some really advanced weapons that they could easily pile a load into Israel, shoot one of their planes out of the sky, blow up ships and stuff. Loads of ways they could attack the country that should be their main enemy, but they don't seem to go there other than to get medical treatment and instructions.

ISIS has their hands full trying to wipe all the muslim non-believers first, than on to Isreal and the rest of the world.

Originally Posted by rickschoppers

ISIS has their hands full trying to wipe all the muslim non-believers first, than on to Isreal and the rest of the world.

Blimey - so before getting to israel, their neighbour, they are firstly going to travel the whoe world then? Singapore, Malaysia, south Thailand? Most of Indonesia? Urumchi melon country in China? A bit cold for the rag heads up there. Surely you would think that rather than trying to kill 1,000,000,000 non believing muslims around the world, they might spare a thought for the country ethnically cleansing their brothers just along the road. No? Wouldn't they think this?

Ohhh ok.

Yup. That's why they will never succeed.

so no chance then that there are other reasons? Would their mossad israeli commander in chief agree that they will never succeed?

Possibly. You would have to ask him Pseudo.

Originally Posted by rickschoppers

Possibly. You would have to ask him Pseudo.

I would but I don't speak yiddish (the germanic language that the zionists speak)

I am sure you could find an interpreter.

Probably could, but the problem is that if they speak yiddish, they are likely to be a zionist, and basically the would lie to protect the scam. So thats a dead end then.

Possibly, but maybe they will tell the truth to you.

Originally Posted by rickschoppers

Possibly, but maybe they will tell the truth to you.

might do

Do you have any idea why ISIS, who are dedicated to setting up an Islamic State in the Levant, in the middle of which is israel, have never made a move against israel, but only concentrate on the countries that the US and israel want to enforce regime change upon?

Is this a trick question?

Nope - no one seems to know why not. It never enters into the mind of the fear mongering media to ask it, and politicians avoid it like the plague. I am certain that some of our resident know it all folk would know the reason why. Harry? Ent? (same same those two - multinik I reckon), Ant? they must know.

I think it is because they do not want to risk damaging the hospitals that ISIS fighters get treated in - so protecting their own. Yes that must be it.

Well, not being a 'know it all', I am not able to answer your question. It does make for interesting fodder for those who do think they know it all however.

It's actually quite simple. They chose areas of land where the governments were weak due to war and divisions.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by rickschoppers

Possibly, but maybe they will tell the truth to you.

might do

Do you have any idea why ISIS, who are dedicated to setting up an Islamic State in the Levant, in the middle of which is israel, have never made a move against israel, but only concentrate on the countries that the US and israel want to enforce regime change upon?

IS are not stupid.

Israel do not play by the West's bizarre Queensberry rules.

They will just scorch the fucking earth and not give a shit about collateral damage.

And IS know it.

Originally Posted by Neverna

It's actually quite simple. They chose areas of land where the governments were weak due to war.

What - Paris? Brussels?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Do you have any idea why ISIS, who are dedicated to setting up an Islamic State in the Levant, in the middle of which is israel, have never made a move against israel, but only concentrate on the countries that the US and israel want to enforce regime change upon?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Neverna

It's actually quite simple. They chose areas of land where the governments were weak due to war.

What - Paris? Brussels?

Got a link for that, Pseudo?

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Do you have any idea why ISIS, who are dedicated to setting up an Islamic State in the Levant, in the middle of which is israel, have never made a move against israel, but only concentrate on the countries that the US and israel want to enforce regime change upon?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Neverna

It's actually quite simple. They chose areas of land where the governments were weak due to war.

What - Paris? Brussels?

Got a link for that, Pseudo?

ISIS bomb-maker behind Paris and Brussels attacks was member of Jihadi John's beheading gang | Daily Mail Online

From the mainstream press - ISIS apparently. Of course, the right minded sensible people know that these were false flag attacks, but continue the charade if you like.

So anyway, of all the millions of muslims, sure that might like a bacon sandwich occassionally but a muslim, do the praying and stuff, why do they attack them and not the criminal rogue israeli state that has never been attacked ever?

Sure, israel chucks a few of their own missiles at israel sometimes to keep the settlers shit scared and happy to watch the Palestinians being slaughtered (mostly because the thick as pig shit murikan twats) but that is not ISIS doing it. So why are they not ever attacking israel?

I was referring to your claim that "the US and israel want to enforce regime change upon" Paris and Brussels. Do you really believe that?