Originally Posted by BobcockFrom SIT post above.Originally Posted by Sailing into trouble
Originally Posted by BobcockFrom SIT post above.Originally Posted by Sailing into trouble
In statements about the missing MH370 Boeing, officials omit how key agencies deliberately withheld critical information regarding a Boeing that flew in the same region just over one year ago. Latest information means MH370 could have made it to that same area where the other Boeing was able to come and go without telling officials: the Maldives.
The Maldives, a 1,190 island nation in the Indian Ocean, is southwest of Sri Lanka and 400 km (250 mi) southwest of India – a four- to five-hour flight from Kuala Lumpur. [Read the rest of that story here.]
Eyewitnesses in the Maldives agreed the jumbo was travelling north to south east heading toward Addu, the southern tip of the Maldives.
All the eyewitnesses commented on the very loud noise the craft made when flying over the island.All agreed the doors on the aircraft could be seen clearly.
“Some people got out of their houses to see what was causing the tremendous noise, too,” they said.
Island Councillor Mohamed Zaheem said other residents of Kuda Huvadhoo had spoken up about the incident.
Malaysia 370 Seen In Maldives Where Drug Dealers' Boeing Refueled Near Diego Garcia, Left Secretly, Caused Chaos | Events
Then this bit, where the Maldives military inform Malaysian military that the report was untrue;
"Malaysia on Wednesday dismissed reports of a possible sighting of the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 by islanders in the Maldives.
The Malaysian acting transport minister Hishammuddin Hussein told reporters in Kuala Lumpur that the authorities in the Maldives have told Malaysia the reports are "not true".
"I can confirm that the Malaysian Chief of the Defence Force has contacted his counterpart in the Maldives, who has confirmed that these reports are not true," Hishammuddin said.
Whilst the disappearance of the Boeing 777 jet, carrying 239 passengers has left the whole world in bewilderment, several residents of Kuda Huvadhoo told Haveeru on Tuesday that they saw a "low flying jumbo jet" at around 6:15am on March 8.
They said that it was a white aircraft, with red stripes across it – which is what the Malaysia Airlines flights typically look like.
Eyewitnesses from the Kuda Huvadhoo concurred that the aeroplane was travelling North to South-East, towards the Southern tip of the Maldives – Addu. They also noted the incredibly loud noise that the flight made when it flew over the island.
A local aviation expert told Haveeru that it is "likely" for MH370 to have flown over the Maldives. The possibility of any aircraft flying over the island at the reported time is extremely low, the expert added.
The Maldives police have also launched an investigation into the reported sighting of the aircraft.
HaveeruOnline - Malaysia denies reported sighting of MH370 in Maldives
Last edited by ENT; 11-04-2014 at 04:30 PM.
BBC News - Missing plane MH370: Abbott 'confident' over signalsAustralian leader Tony Abbott says authorities are confident that signals heard in the Indian Ocean are coming from the "black box" flight recorders of the missing Malaysia Airlines plane.
Speaking in China, he said teams had "very much narrowed" the search area.
An Australian vessel has on four occasions picked up signals consistent with flight recorders, officials say.
But a fifth signal picked up by a plane on Thursday is now thought unlikely to be linked to flight MH370.
The Malaysian plane vanished on 8 March, with 239 people on board. It was flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing when it lost contact with air traffic controllers.
Based on satellite data, officials believe it crashed into the southern Indian Ocean, west of the Australian city of Perth, far from its intended flight path.
Narrowed search
An Australian vessel, the Ocean Shield, has been using a US Navy towed pinger locator to listen out. Signals were detected twice over the weekend and twice on Tuesday.
This handout photo taken on 7 April 2014 and released on 9 April 2014 by Australian Defence shows Gunner Richard Brown (L) of Transit Security Element on the lookout on the forecastle of HMAS Perth in the search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 in the southern Indian Ocean
Ships and planes have been scouring a narrowed search area for signs of the missing plane
malaysian airliner search
File photo: An Australian RAAF P-3 Orion returns to Base Pearce after a day of searching an area in the Indian Ocean for the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, 8 April 2014
The possible signal heard by an Australia P-3 Orion is unlikely to relate to the missing plane, officials say
Speaking in China during an official visit, Mr Abbott said search teams needed as much information as possible from the acoustic signals before the black-box batteries ran out.
"It's [the search area] been very much narrowed down because we've now had a series of detections, some for quite a long period of time,'' Mr Abbott said.
"Nevertheless, we're getting to the stage where the signal from the black box is starting to fade."
He also said that officials were confident that they knew "the position of the black box flight recorder to within some kilometres".
"Still, confidence in the approximate position of the black box is not the same as recovering wreckage from almost 4.5km (2.6 miles) beneath the sea or finally determining all that happened on that flight."
On Thursday an Australian aircraft picked up an audio signal in the same area as the four previous detections.
But the Australian Joint Acoustic Analysis Centre had analysed the data and confirmed that the signal was "unlikely to be related to the aircraft black boxes", said Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, who heads the agency overseeing the search.
Continue reading the main story
MH370 - Facts at a glance
8 March: Malaysia Airlines Kuala Lumpur-Beijing flight carrying 239 people disappears
Plane's transponder, which communicates with ground radar, was switched off as it left Malaysian airspace
Satellite 'pings' indicate plane was still flying seven hours after satellite contact was lost
24 March: Based on new calculations, Malaysian PM says "beyond reasonable doubt" that plane crashed in southern Indian Ocean with no survivors
What we know
The search for flight MH370
He said that there had been "no major breakthrough in the search for MH370".
ACM Houston has cautioned that search work using the towed pinger locator will continue until officials are sure that the black-box batteries - which last about a month - have run out.
At that point the Bluefin 21 submersible drone will be sent down to search for wreckage on the sea floor, but this could be a laborious and pain-staking task made more difficult by the presence of silt.
On Friday, up to 15 aircraft and 13 ships were involved in the search, which was targeting a reduced area of 46,713 square kilometres.
As the Ocean Shield continues to listen for acoustic signals, ships and aircraft are combing another area for possible debris from the plane, based on analysis of ocean drift.
"Yesterday there were no sightings reported by search aircraft or objects recovered by ships," the co-ordinating agency said in a statement on Friday morning.
Investigators still do not know why MH370 strayed so far off course, after disappearing over the South China Sea between Malaysia and Vietnam.
The backgrounds of both passengers and crew have been scrutinised as officials consider hijacking, sabotage, pilot action or mechanical failure as possible causes.
MH370 mystery
Ocean floorOcean maps problem
The region of ocean floor where Malaysia Airlines MH370 is thought to have come down was mapped by satellites that inferred the shape of the seabed from the shape of the water surface above.
Costs of the search
Recovery hope boost
Searchers hear signals
What we know
Checking pulses
Search logistics
Black-box answers
10 questions
Mourning the missing
The debris
Who are the pilots?
Salvage challenges
Day of searching
Armchair hunters
The passengers
I think they will find, the hidden nazi gold, the holy grail, and the original ten commandments before they find that plane. I hear a pinging in my kitchen. Is it the missing plane of my microwave telling me my reheated coffee is hot?
CNN) -- Elevated hopes that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 might soon be found were tempered Friday, when the joint search agency said the latest signal probably isn't from the missing plane.
The most recent acoustic signal detected by an Australian aircraft in the search Thursday is "unlikely to be related to the aircraft black boxes," Australian chief search coordinator Angus Houston said in a statement Friday.
"On the information I have available to me, there has been no major breakthrough in the search for MH370," Houston said.
"Further analysis continues to be undertaken by Australian Joint Acoustic Analysis Centre."
But Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott told reporters in China on Friday that authorities are "very confident" the signals picked up by acoustic detectors are coming from the black box of missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, CNN affiliate Sky News Australia reported.
It's unclear whether Abbott was referring to four signals detected earlier this week.
5th signal detected 'not likely' from MH370 black boxes, officials say - CNN.com
This is from the India Times
Missing Malaysian jetliner: Maldives islanders saw 'low flying plane' - The Times of India
NEW DELHI: As multiple nations search for the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 frantically, reports are emerging that the plane was spotted by some people near the Maldivian islands.
Maldivian news website Haveeru reported that residents of the remote Maldives island of Kuda Huvadhoo in Dhaal Atoll said they saw a "low-flying jumbo jet" around 6.15am (Maldivian time) on March 8, the day when the flight disappeared. It also said the residents reported that that it was a white aircraft, with red stripes across it like the planes operated by Malaysia Airlines.
READ ALSO: Mystery deepens as new timeline revealed
Haveeru quoted an eyewitness as saying: "I've never seen a jet flying so low over our island before. We've seen seaplanes, but I'm sure that this was not one of those. I could even make out the doors on the plane clearly."
The eyewitness said many other people on the island have also seen the plane.
This is a report when the Malaysian Government discounted the islanders reports.
Hope this helps
Malaysia rejects reports of possible MH370 sighting in Maldives - Channel NewsAsia
So we have an oil rig worker who has seen a plane descending in flames plus people on the maldives seeing a low-flying plane overhead. With all these planes dropping out of the sky it seems air travel isn't as safe as we were previously given to believe.
I see fish. They are everywhere. They don't know they are fish.
^
I remember commenting on a quote, from a Malaysian official I think, where he stated that searching for this plane was like looking for a needle in a stack of needles, at which I commented that this indicated there were so many crashed planes that this one didn't stand out. Maybe he was nearer to the truth than I thought.
The relatives must be as angry as hell. A plane bound for China now seems to have ended up just about anywhere and nobody appears to have much of a clue. In this age of technology I find it all totally ridiculous.
Last edited by Thormaturge; 12-04-2014 at 09:28 AM.
Authorities have been telling HUGE porkies about MH 370's fuel capacity and range.
A Boeing 777 200 ER can carry enough fuel to fly from Malaysia to London or Oslo or LA, it could have made the flight to NZ and back to Malaysia.
It's range is given as 7,700 nautical miles or 13,300 kilometres.
The plane could have easily been flown to anywhere across Africa, west coast the limit.
So why all the guff about the plane running out of fuel and crashing?
Especially since MA knows exactly how much fuel MH 370 was carrying and refusing to publish the info.
Have a squiz at this site.....
http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/com..._singapore.pdf
KL to Beijing is only 2,700 miles, 5 hours 10 mins flying time, about one third of its 7,700 n.miles maximum range.
The authorities did indeed give their "estimate", but that's all they gave.
The captain could have added more fuel before take off at his discretion.
This from another source;
"Mr Hansford pointed to the amount of fuel likely on board the Boeing 777-200, at nearly full capacity with 31,000 gallons instead of the 45 per cent loading required to pilot a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, as being a strong indicator that MH370's disappearance was not accidental."
Read more: Straight line from last contact to 'debris' site suggests 'on-board emergency knocked out crew' | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
That little snippet, "nearly full capacity" is what the captain asked the plane to be topped up to, unnecessary for the Beijing trip.
Why?
That little snippet was preceded by "likely" - the amount of fuel likely on board the Boeing 777-200. Mr Hansford did not state as fact the plane was at nearly full capacity, did he?
Still plenty of speculation: suggests, likely, I think, possibly, thought to be, could have been, could conceivably, likelihood, possible debris ...
^ BTW, that Daily Mail article is 3 weeks old.
Last edited by Neverna; 12-04-2014 at 11:07 AM.
Because fuel is cheaper in Malaysia than China, even when you take into account the cost of 'ferrying' the return fuel load with you.Originally Posted by ENT
Fuel ferrying?
Anyone care to do the maths and work out how much the price difference would have to be to make it worthwhile.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...64542518,d.Yms
Captain has to sign for the fuel request and the delivery is recorded so authorities will know the exact amount of fuel on board the aircraft.
Spot on, Troy.
MH370 co-pilot made mid-flight phone call: report
April 12, 2014
KUALA LUMPUR - The co-pilot of missing Malaysian airliner MH370 attempted to make a mid-flight call from his mobile phone just before the plane vanished from radar screens, a report said Saturday citing unnamed investigators.
The call ended abruptly possibly "because the aircraft was fast moving away from the (telecommunications) tower", The New Straits Times quoted a source as saying.
But the Malaysian daily also quoted another source saying that while Fariq Abdul Hamid’s "line was reattached", there was no certainty that a call was made from the Boeing 777 that vanished on March 8.
The report -- titled a "desperate call for help" -- did not say who he was trying to contact.
Fariq and Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah have come under intense scrutiny after the plane mysteriously vanished en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people on board.
nationmultimedia.com
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)