Thread: Contact lost with Malaysia Plane.

I can't believe TD CSI have failed to crack this one.

Originally Posted by Norton

Oh well. Let's search the same area all over again.

No....just a bit to the left this time.

Yes, near there....now up a bit......

Originally Posted by Latindancer

No....just a bit to the left this time.

Yes, near there....now up a bit......

Sounds like the wife when she needs a back scratch.

^
Sounds like my love-making skills.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The beacons are next to useless in water that deep.

We learned that from AF447.

Do try and keep up.

Which beacons, the life raft, 4 and the planes water landing beacon go off 45 seconds after a water landing. So a controlled water landing is out of the question, would not sink in 45 seconds.

Try a and find one of these alleged experts, be it controlled ditching, out of gas, spiral or turned back, can explain why none of the rescue beacons activated.

Yes, they don't work under water, plane needs to go down fast, but no wreckage in the search area.

Originally Posted by jamescollister

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The beacons are next to useless in water that deep.

We learned that from AF447.

Do try and keep up.

Which beacons, the life raft, 4 and the planes water landing beacon go off 45 seconds after a water landing. So a controlled water landing is out of the question, would not sink in 45 seconds.

Try a and find one of these alleged experts, be it controlled ditching, out of gas, spiral or turned back, can explain why none of the rescue beacons activated.

Yes, they don't work under water, plane needs to go down fast, but no wreckage in the search area.

The liferafts are in the fucking doors, and they have to be opened by people who aren't dead. That was easy for him to take care of. Just turn off the cabin air and suffocate everyone.

The beacons could have been going for ten fucking days before it sank, they weren't looking in the Indian Ocean until then.

And if a controlled water landing is out of the question, how the fuck did Sully land that bastard on the Hudson with no engines then?

I'll even give you a clue: Full flaps deployed for maximum lift at low speed.

Which is supported by the fact that the debris they have found is consistent with the flaps being in that configuration.

You read too many conspiracy websites that are short on fact, and not enough news, or you'd have at least known they didn't start looking in the current search area for ten days.

Everything in your post is rubbish. Start reading some factual sites instead of fairy stories, we have enough whackjobs on here as it is.

Originally Posted by jamescollister

The last place you would put the aircraft, if you didn't want it found , is in the water.

^This guy's a f'kin hatstand troll.



fyi

COSPAS SARSAT beacons harry satellite world wide emergency coverage, no searching involved.

Signal SOS sent, satellite relays it to the emergency monitoring stations, just like skiers, hikers, small boats etc. use.

Aircraft ones can be set off manually and automatically upon contact with water, so way no beacons.

Originally Posted by jamescollister

COSPAS SARSAT beacons harry satellite world wide emergency coverage, no searching involved.

Signal SOS sent, satellite relays it to the emergency monitoring stations, just like skiers, hikers, small boats etc. use.

Aircraft ones can be set off manually and automatically upon contact with water, so way no beacons.

I don't even know what that drunken ramble is supposed to mean, it makes no sense whatsoever.

The underwater locator beacons on commercial aircraft are not satellite communications devices, they emit an unltrasonic ping every second on 37.5Khz to a maximum range of around 3km, so in water that deep you'd have to be almost on top of them to pick it up.

Stop using Google if you don't know how to do it properly.

Originally Posted by Gazza

^
Sounds like my love-making skills.

If you're gonna use these fancy terms, whatcha expect? It's called a shag.

The planes main emergency location transmitter is on top of the aircraft, it can't be shut down in flight, it goes off on impact, be it land or water.

It didn't send any signals to the satellite monitoring system, so how did the suicidal pilot know it wouldn't give the location away.

It doesn't work under water, meaning the plane had to be submerge within 50 second of hitting the water.

No controlled water landing to keep the plane intact, nose dive, but no wreckage found in the search area.

^ Jim, are you ruling out a controlled water landing?

I can't accept that a suicidal pilot would perform a controlled water landing.


"Ok....here I am in the middle of the Southern Indian ocean, 4,000 Ks from anywhere. Planes's floating on water now, and I've suffocated all the passengers.

Hmm...think I'll just step out for a spliff and wait for the big waves to drown me".



I really can't see that having happened....

Originally Posted by jamescollister

The planes main emergency location transmitter is on top of the aircraft, it can't be shut down in flight, it goes off on impact, be it land or water.

It didn't send any signals to the satellite monitoring system, so how did the suicidal pilot know it wouldn't give the location away.

It doesn't work under water, meaning the plane had to be submerge within 50 second of hitting the water.

No controlled water landing to keep the plane intact, nose dive, but no wreckage found in the search area.

Again, you're making no fucking sense.

"It goes off on impact"
"It doesn't work underwater"

Why the fuck do you think it's called an Underwater Locator beacon?! And with a range of 3km, who the fuck is going to be listening in on that frequency in the arse end of nowhere?

You're suffering from what is known as Confirmation Bias. You are actually making shit up to try and fit your own bizarre theory, rather than looking at the hard evidence.

Originally Posted by Bettyboo

It's called a shag.

I refrained from using that word lest I be accused of being stuck in the '70's.

Originally Posted by Gazza

Originally Posted by Bettyboo

It's called a shag.

I refrained from using that word lest I be accused of being stuck in the '70's.

Or an Austin Powers movie.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

...who the fuck is going to be listening in on that frequency in the arse end of nowhere?

ECHELON and every other nosey bas2rd going.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Austin Powers....

Horrible c^nt.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

I can't accept that a suicidal pilot would perform a controlled water landing..

For the second or third time in our posting history, I agree with you entirely on a point.

A controlled landing somewhere between 5 and 24 degrees South East of Australia.

Includes regions from Seychelles, Maldives, Diego Garcia , Cocos and Xmas Isles.

The amount and types of sea life found on various retrieved debris indicate a more northerly point of possible ditching of MH370.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Why the fuck do you think it's called an Underwater Locator beacon?! And with a range of 3km, who the fuck is going to be listening in on that frequency in the arse end of nowhere?

It's not called an underwater location beacon, that's the so called black boxes.

Cut and paste for you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerge...beacon_station

When manually activated, or automatically activated upon immersion or impact, such beacons send out a distress signal. The signals are monitored worldwide and the location of the distress is detected by non-geostationary satellites doppler trilateration and in more recent EPIRBs also by GPS.[2]

The basic purpose of a distress radiobeacon is to help rescuers find survivors within the so-called "golden day"[3] (the first 24 hours following a traumatic event) during which the majority of survivors can usually be saved.

Mal 370 sent no auto SOS, so it wasn't floating in the sea and it had at lest 4 more, other than the primary one.

HP, no one except you has suggested the plane didn't have ELB, the only question raised by the experts and the families, is why they didn't activate.

Boeing has confirm, plane was delivered with the 4 standard ELB, are you suggesting that Malaysian airline deliberately removed, or deactivated them

Originally Posted by jamescollister

HP, no one except you has suggested the plane didn't have ELB, the only question raised by the experts and the families, is why they didn't activate.

Boeing has confirm, plane was delivered with the 4 standard ELB, are you suggesting that Malaysian airline deliberately removed, or deactivated them

You seem a bit hung up on this bit of kit.

I can think of all sorts of reasons. Chief of which are (and both likely):


They didn't replace the batteries (we know their record on that).
250 tons of plane sank within 50 seconds.

Do you actually remember AF447?

Originally Posted by ENT

A controlled landing somewhere between 5 and 24 degrees South East of Australia.

The amount and types of sea life found on various retrieved debris indicate a more northerly point of possible ditching of MH370.

Should read, between 5 and 24 degrees South, west of Australia.