Thread: Contact lost with Malaysia Plane.

Read all that elsewhere, previously.

The articled statement of Freescale's doesn't mention that the same chips, Kinetis KL02 made by Freescale Kuala Lumpur and the new Freescale Kinetis kl03 can be used for military purposes. Why would they? There's no magic difference between chips used in either military or civilian scenarios.

It's their application that counts.

Strange how Freescale got the full patent rights for the Kinetis kl03 chip shortly after MH370 disappeared, with reportedly 4 scientists, all patent holders of that chip.

Originally Posted by ENT

Strange how Freescale got the full patent rights for the Kinetis kl03 chip shortly after MH370 disappeared, with reportedly 4 scientists, all patent holders of that chip.

Utter nonsense.

Employees of companies - and in particular tech firms - are obliged to assign any and all intellectual property created during the course of their employment to their employer.

There's no way a patent would have even been filed listing them as the inventors/owners.

ent?

More than two years and 3,000 posts and you guys haven't solved this yet?

^^^ Only going by what's reported.
I agree with what you say about patent ownership as applicable to employees of Freescale, if they're contracted to develop or produce/create something for them.

If the creators of the chip did so independently, prior to becoming employed by Freescale, and then contributed their work to Freescale as partners in a specific contract, they would be entitled to claim a share of the patented applied for that, their own work.

If my mothers fathers friends next door neighbors dog was actually a goat...

You'd be a millionaire if you could steal it and get away with it.

Originally Posted by ENT

The articled statement of Freescale's doesn't mention that the same chips, Kinetis KL02 made by Freescale Kuala Lumpur and the new Freescale Kinetis kl03 can be used for military purposes.

As can thousands of other chips.
Those two Kinetis chips are just low power version of a common microprocessor design, their main usage is for battery powered portable equipment.
Or to be more specific, they are intended for smartphones and tablets.

The Australian newspaper today reported that the PM said the rogue pilot theory will not be followed,with just 10,000km of the designated area left to be covered.
Critics here of the search have attributed the government's refusal to publicly embrace the
rogue pilot theory to the wish to spare Malaysia the embarrassment of having to acknowledge its citizen took part in a act of terror.

Originally Posted by reddog

The Australian newspaper today reported that the PM said the rogue pilot theory will not be followed,with just 10,000km of the designated area left to be covered.
Critics here of the search have attributed the government's refusal to publicly embrace the
rogue pilot theory to the wish to spare Malaysia the embarrassment of having to acknowledge its citizen took part in a act of terror.

Act of terror?

Critics = stupid.

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

More than two years and 3,000 posts and you guys haven't solved this yet?

We're working on it.

FINALLY....

Malaysian officials have confirmed that the captain of Flight MH370 had plotted a course on his home computer to the southern Indian Ocean area where the plane is believed to have have crashed.

Malaysia confirms MH370 pilot had plotted Indian Ocean route

That info came up two years ago in the early stages of the search.

That it took Malaysia this long to put their hands up and acknowledge the fact only highlights the ducking and diving going on about what really happened.

The Oz search in the Indian Ocean was just a red herring designed to distract while garnering geological and ocean studies info for Australia and whoever else it was that paid for the exploration and bathymetric survey.

The million dollar question though was, and still is,

Which route did the pilot take?

Originally Posted by ENT

That info came up two years ago in the early stages of the search.

That it took Malaysia this long to put their hands up and acknowledge the fact only highlights the ducking and diving going on about what really happened.

The Oz search in the Indian Ocean was just a red herring designed to distract while garnering geological and ocean studies info for Australia and whoever else it was that paid for the exploration and bathymetric survey.

The million dollar question though was, and still is,

Which route did the pilot take?

Malaysia has never officially admitted this until now.

And they're still doing their best to say it is not significant.

The search in the Indian Ocean was for the plane, you fucking idiot. If they wanted to search the sea bed for any other reason there has never been anything stopping them.

Do you have a brain tumour or something?

Getting upset again harry?

Oz's so called 'search' for missing MH370 was bound to failure from the start, pea-brain, it was claimed to be based on INMARSAT's bogus maths, which we all now know to be total fairy dust, designed to keep the search away from the western side of the South Indian Ocean.

You're wrong about there never having been anything preventing the bathymetric survey undertaken.
The cost was prohibitive. The bogus search for MH370 not only drew a red herring across the ocean, but provided the excuse for funding the two year long survey for oil and minerals.

You actually know very well what the huge costs of an exploratory petrological survey could amount to, that's on land. Under the oceans its astronomical!

More news will seep and filter through, and more evidence will be found pointing to a ditching closer to Diego Garcia than any establishment types would care to acknowledge.

Originally Posted by ENT

You're wrong about there never having been anything preventing the bathymetric survey undertaken.
The cost was prohibitive. The bogus search for MH370 provided the excuse for funding the two year long survey for oil and minerals.

You actually know very well what the huge costs of an exploratory petrological survey could amount to, that's on land. Under the oceans its astronomical!

ENT has a point here. Everyone's wanting to find more oil and minerals, and the Indian ocean has been relatively unexplored. This was a good excuse to kill two birds with one stone.

The point itself is valid. And he probably only Googled it anyhow.

Or in his case, gurgled

Originally Posted by Latindancer

The point itself is valid. And he probably only Googled it anyhow.

Envious little 12th grader.
Google it yourself, see if you can find where the oil is.

Originally Posted by peterpan

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

You're wrong about there never having been anything preventing the bathymetric survey undertaken.
The cost was prohibitive. The bogus search for MH370 provided the excuse for funding the two year long survey for oil and minerals.

You actually know very well what the huge costs of an exploratory petrological survey could amount to, that's on land. Under the oceans its astronomical!

ENT has a point here. Everyone's wanting to find more oil and minerals, and the Indian ocean has been relatively unexplored. This was a good excuse to kill two birds with one stone.

plse don't encourage the loony one LD it will just stimulate him onto more nonsensical ramblings.

Go take a pill PP, it's getting late, you need your rest, you're getting dozy.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

The point itself is valid. And he probably only Googled it anyhow.

Or in his case, gurgled

It's bollocks anyway.

Sure it's useful information to have, but they got it anyway while searching for the plane.

Both areas are outside their control.

They can't just decide they are going to go and mine the sea bed in international waters.

Of course now our resident conspiracy twat will rush to find out why and then come back and change his story.

They need help from Madame Arcati to find this missing plane.

MH370: It wasn't an FBI report so why was it given a false label?

If you are going to lie about something you need to have a very good recollection as to what you previously said, and Kuala Lumpur said back in early 2014 a great deal of what is causing so much amazed outrage in certain media.

There is no FBI report into the data retrieved from the home flight simulator of dead MH370 captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah.

But there is a lengthy Malaysian Police report misrepresented as being from the FBI concerning the findings made by a forensic computing contractor for them, covering investigations which began in March 2014, days after MH370, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200ER disappeared on its way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people on board earlier that month.

That report is dated in May 2014. The search for data in the home simulator, and its potential value to the criminal inquiry into the mystery, was referred to by Malaysian officials at the regular MH370 briefings held in Kuala Lumpur at that time, and reported at various times in the general media and Plane Talking.

Nothing material arising from that investigation was announced or leaked, except in the vaguest of terms. The reports about this investigation began appearing in news archives late in March 2014.

The classified as secret police report does contain some positions in one game flight simulator path that indicate a track down over the southern Indian Ocean which wasn’t mentioned at the time, and many others that included routes that were either on the Malaysia Airlines network, or consisted of alternative or diversionary airports for such flights.

The ATSB guidance on that data, that it doesn’t indicate the location of MH370, or provide other assistance in refining the search, may be correct.

However, the important question arises, why was this presented to the gullible as an FBI report (the FBI has no interest in locating the sunk wreckage) when it was a Malaysia Police report?

One possible explanation is that this has allowed the Malaysian Government to correctly deny that there is any FBI report about the flight sim in the captain’s home, thus covering up the fact that there IS such a report, produced internally.

(There were also acknowledged, at that time, checks on the backgrounds of people on the passenger manifest in which the help of the FBI and other national criminal investigation agencies were enlisted, as they often are, and for many often routine reasons.)

The trouble with the possibility of Malaysia seeking to leave a false trail on this is also known as the liar’s challenge. If you are going to lie about something over a period of time you need to have a very good recollection as what you have previously said, and Kuala Lumpur basically said back in early 2014 a great deal of what is now causing so much amazed outrage in some media.

Let’s revisit that early but forgotten period in the MH370 mystery. Kuala Lumpur was very careful not to speak about either pilot as being suspected of a crime. But it was very quick to argue, and most observers would concede, correctly, that MH370 was intentionally diverted from its route shortly after it was established on its filed flight path to Beijing and over the Gulf of Thailand.

Based on revelations made on May 1, 2014, by acting transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein senior government figures knew on the morning of March 8, 2014, that MH370 had been seen by military radar flying west across the Malaysia Peninsula.

This means that the Malaysia government and Hishammuddin Hussein lied to the media when they denied early reports that such tracking had taken place. It also means, as Plane Talking often reported that Malaysia, from its PM down, lied to Australia and the other early search partners, when it urged them to press deeper into the South China Sea, and across to India, and even deep into central Asia, in searching for wreckage when it would have known none would be found in any of those regions.

Malaysia knew what many of the less technically versed conspiracy theorists still deny, that the jet did indeed fly into the southern Indian Ocean, exactly where being the crucial question.

Why did Malaysia lie to us and others? One possibility is that it was engaged in a cover up concerning adverse intelligence about a Malaysia Airlines pilot that had been ignored, until the terrible night when the 777 vanished. Was it fearful of an early discovery of floating bodies and other clues as to events on MH370?

This suggestion, which this observer and others, including in other airlines, have discussed for more than two years, remains unproven, but definitely possible.

On Sunday night the Nine network will air a significant report on MH370. The promotional material has included the claim that the wife of Prime Minister Najib Razak said ‘the captain took the jet’.

This claim takes those who have followed MH370 from the outset back to the earliest months of the mystery in 2014, when the fingers of suspicion pointed at Zaharie Ahmad Shah were many. It doesn’t take us any closer to finding out where the jet is or if he really committed such a heinous crime.

https://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetal...n-false-label/

You'll post any old muppet's blog won't you?

"crikey.com"

I look forward to "strewth.org" and "bloodyoath.net".

The promotional material has included the claim that the wife of Prime Minister Najib Razak said ‘the captain took the jet’.

Which is no surprise as that's probably what happened.

How about the Haliburton Echo instead?


You could read all THE TRUTH in there harry..