Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Hmmm politicians who lie.

Fucking hard to name, eh?

Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush - "Read my lips"
Clinton - "I did not have sex with that woman"
Bush Jr. - "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction"
Obama - "You can keep your doctor"

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

Do any politicians really ever tell the truth? There are levels of telling a lie and I think Bill showed his colors and got caught when he dropped his trousers in front of an intern. Of course he said he never had "sex.", bur that depends on what definition you use of sex. Hillary does exactly the same whenever she opens her mouth. One just needs to understand at any given time, her words could be at level 1, or at level 99.

Personally, I think both the Clinton's are pathological liars.

Originally Posted by rickschoppers

Do any politicians really ever tell the truth? There are levels of telling a lie and I think Bill showed his colors and got caught when he dropped his trousers in front of an intern. Of course he said he never had "sex.", bur that depends on what definition you use of sex. Hillary does exactly the same whenever she opens her mouth. One just needs to understand at any given time, her words could be at level 1, or at level 99.

Personally, I think both the Clinton's are pathological liars.

Ahh yes Pathological , this is the very word I was looking for , cheers and of course it goes without saying that the usual Hilarious Clinton fans will not comment cos after all they will simply refuse to watch it

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Hmmm politicians who lie.

Fucking hard to name, eh?

Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush - "Read my lips"
Clinton - "I did not have sex with that woman"
Bush Jr. - "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction"
Obama - "You can keep your doctor"

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

Not really, we are talking about the integrity of a women who has put herself forward as the POTUS , and please be aware that I have thus far said nothing whatsoever against Bernie Sanders cos all it will be with Hilarious is old wine in new bottles

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by Troy

^ As Bernie has already stated, it is a matter for the courts and should not be politicised.

It may resurface when Clinton is nominated but that will be in a different thread...

Should not be politicized? A would be president being investigated for possible treason should just be brushed under the rug?

Treason?

You've been listening to Glenn Beck and Alex Jones again, haven't you?

No not protecting classified government documents can in certain instances be an act of treason.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So you think Hillary using an unsecured non government server to transmit emails marked secure to be a non issue.

Well it seems the "Clinton sending emails marked top secret" lie can go back to bed, so why do you insist on repeating it?

"State Department spokesman John Kirby said the documents, totaling 37 pages, were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but are being upgraded at the request of the Intelligence Community because they contain sensitive information."

Because marked secret then or now being the head of the department she should we'll have known the sensitivities involved with the emails. I also find it curious that they stated one of the emails too sensitive for congress to see would not have been classified secret or higher at the time it was sent. You go ahead and live in a fantasy world if you choose, but any right thinking person who has studied the Clinton history should have no problem seeing through the shield that covers the life of lies and corruption they have lived.

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963 the women could not tell the truth (like her Hubby) if her life depended on it

Hmmm politicians who lie.

Fucking hard to name, eh?

Nixon - Watergate
Reagan - Iran-Contra
Bush - "Read my lips"
Clinton - "I did not have sex with that woman"
Bush Jr. - "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction"
Obama - "You can keep your doctor"

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

If it was only lying I suppose it could be overlooked but the history of the Clintons shady deals goes way beyond lying, from the time Bill was the attorney general of Arkanas to the present.

It's only my opinion, but I think that the nomination of either Party leader should have nothing to do with attacking the opposition all to do with explaining the policies that you want to introduce as well as showing the strength of character /Statesmanship you have that is required to be President of the United States.

In most respects, Bernie is head and shoulders above the rest.

However, on policies that you want to introduce, the voting public within the party need to decide if they are a) achievable and b) will they be acceptable to opposition voters during the presidential election.

Many people would appear not to understand a lot of the things that Bernie is saying nor his ideologies.

I see time and time again the question of Bernie and the Black vote or Hispanic vote or Minority vote but to him they are all the same,,,there is no difference between a white man and a black man nor any other man...about time America grew up and understood this.

Let the Courts decide if Ms Clinton has done anything wrong. Let the people decide which of the two candidates will make America the place they want it to be.

Originally Posted by piwanoi

RP I suggest you watch the video in my post 3963

Good God, he's starting that outside the DH as well now . . .

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Funny how it's only an issue when it's a Democrat, eh?

The vitriol is astounding, first it was a black guy and now a woman is being pilloried based on I heard/watch this vblog etc . . . Add black and 'or woman to democrat ad the knives come out with 'Buckwheat', 'TheVagina' etc...

Originally Posted by RPETER65

No not protecting classified government documents can in certain instances be an act of treason.

BUT NOT THIS ONE WHICH IS WHAT THE DISCUSSION IS ALL ABOUT. STOP DEVIATING FROM THE ARGUMENT SO YOU CAN SHOW THAT YOU ARE RIGHT

Thank you

Originally Posted by Troy

Let the Courts decide if Ms Clinton has done anything wrong.

She's already been found guilty by piwanoi and rpeters - and millions of like-minded low-information people

It would appear that Megyn Kelly is the Darling of certain TD members when she was asking The Donald awkward questions , well here she is revealing certain inconsistencies with the Clinton foundation of which there are quite a few question marks attached to its credibility

The Rethug snow machine is off to a flying start, as usual.

Republican Clinton Cash Scandal Collapses Before The Book Is Even Released
By Jason Easley on Sat, Apr 25th, 2015

The scandal that Republicans hoped would take down Hillary Clinton has already sputtered and fizzled as the media has largely debunked the book Clinton Cash as strong on allegations, but weak on facts.

The main allegation is that Hillary Clinton was influenced by donations to The Clinton Foundation to use her position as Sec. of State to block the purchase of uranium mine.

Time magazine noted that the allegation first reported in The New York Times was not supported with evidence, “The suggestion of outside influence over U.S. decisionmaking is based on little evidence — the allegations are presented as questions rather than proof. The deal’s approval was the result of an extensive interagency process that required the assent of at least nine different officials and agencies.”

NBC News backed off of the Clinton Cash story too, “Indeed, upon reflection, that Times article doesn’t hold up that well 24 hours after its publication. But if there’s a legitimate criticism of the Clintons here — especially when it comes to the other articles about the Clinton Foundation and Bill’s speaking fees (here and here) — it’s that they were sloppy, bordering on being greedy.”

ABC News, which received an advance copy of the book, blunted called out the lack of facts, “The book offers no proof that Hillary Clinton took any direct action to benefit the groups and interests that were paying her husband.”

The author of the book, Peter Schweizer, worked as a foreign policy adviser to Sarah Palin. He was a fellow at the Koch-funded Hoover Institute, a former speechwriting consultant for George W. Bush, and he has a history of botched hyper-partisan reporting.

The New York Times and Washington Post latched on to Clinton Cash potentially because they were led to believe that a companion book was coming out about Jeb Bush. However, Schweizer’s publisher said that there is no Jeb Bush book coming out.

When boiled down, the Clinton Cash scandal is nothing more than a series of empty allegations. Clinton Cash is equal to the Benghazi scandal and every other conspiracy based witch hunt that Republicans are engaging in.

The book has not been released yet, but instead of blowing up into a major story that will rock the 2016 election, Clinton Cash is poised to join the dusty pile of failed Clinton conspiracies of years past.

Rand Paul has been talking up Clinton Cash as the game changer that would disqualify Hillary Clinton from office, but what the episode demonstrated is how out of touch with reality Republicans are, and how eager some in the mainstream press are to enable the GOP’s delusions.

Republican Clinton Cash Scandal Collapses Before The Book Is Even Released

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by Troy

^ As Bernie has already stated, it is a matter for the courts and should not be politicised.

It may resurface when Clinton is nominated but that will be in a different thread...

Should not be politicized? A would be president being investigated for possible treason should just be brushed under the rug?

Treason?

You've been listening to Glenn Beck and Alex Jones again, haven't you?

No not protecting classified government documents can in certain instances be an act of treason.

You may choose to read this article RP of course the usual's will just completely disregard it Blog: More 'classified' Hillary emails released

^
I read it. More unsubstantiated accusations, but PeaNuts still continues to post this shit as if it meant something.

Originally Posted by MrG

^
I read it. More unsubstantiated accusations, but PeaNuts still continues to post this shit as if it meant something.

What it does is sows the seeds of doubt against Hilarious Clinton You will be telling us next that you have every faith in the integrity of Bill Clinton too

Originally Posted by MrG

[...] More unsubstantiated accusations...

Originally Posted by piwanoi

What it does is sows the seeds of doubt against Hilarious Clinton

Only for people whose level of intellectual inquiry is "unsubstantiated accusations" - i.e. winguts who would believe practically anything that was said anyway.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

If it was only lying I suppose it could be overlooked but the history of the Clintons shady deals goes way beyond lying, from the time Bill was the attorney general of Arkanas to the present.

You are such a clueless retard you will believe anything as long as it fits into your narrow false reality.

Ken Star had his head so far up the Clintons ass for years and he could come up with not one prosecutable offense. A witch hunt that cost millions of taxpayer money and was a colossal failure. Yet morons like you still insist in bleating on.

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas. Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

you just keep living in your bubble.

Says rpeter

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

If it was only lying I suppose it could be overlooked but the history of the Clintons shady deals goes way beyond lying, from the time Bill was the attorney general of Arkanas to the present.

You are such a clueless retard you will believe anything as long as it fits into your narrow false reality.

Ken Star had his head so far up the Clintons ass for years and he could come up with not one prosecutable offense. A witch hunt that cost millions of taxpayer money and was a colossal failure. Yet morons like you still insist in bleating on.

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas. Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Innuendo Innuendo Innuendo.

Why don't you look that word up in a dictionary?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

If it was only lying I suppose it could be overlooked but the history of the Clintons shady deals goes way beyond lying, from the time Bill was the attorney general of Arkanas to the present.

You are such a clueless retard you will believe anything as long as it fits into your narrow false reality.

Ken Star had his head so far up the Clintons ass for years and he could come up with not one prosecutable offense. A witch hunt that cost millions of taxpayer money and was a colossal failure. Yet morons like you still insist in bleating on.

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas. Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Innuendo Innuendo Innuendo.

Why don't you look that word up in a dictionary?

Why don't you watch the video in post 3984?

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

If it was only lying I suppose it could be overlooked but the history of the Clintons shady deals goes way beyond lying, from the time Bill was the attorney general of Arkanas to the present.

You are such a clueless retard you will believe anything as long as it fits into your narrow false reality.

Ken Star had his head so far up the Clintons ass for years and he could come up with not one prosecutable offense. A witch hunt that cost millions of taxpayer money and was a colossal failure. Yet morons like you still insist in bleating on.

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas. Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Innuendo Innuendo Innuendo.

Why don't you look that word up in a dictionary?

Why don't you watch the video in post 3984?

I watch Fox News you idiot, how else would I know what ridiculous nonsense you keep blathering about?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

You are such a clueless retard you will believe anything as long as it fits into your narrow false reality.

Ken Star had his head so far up the Clintons ass for years and he could come up with not one prosecutable offense. A witch hunt that cost millions of taxpayer money and was a colossal failure. Yet morons like you still insist in bleating on.

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas. Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Innuendo Innuendo Innuendo.

Why don't you look that word up in a dictionary?

Why don't you watch the video in post 3984?

I watch Fox News you idiot, how else would I know what ridiculous nonsense you keep blathering about?

Now now Harry getting personal again , you was a Fox News's Megyn Kelly fan not long ago when she was tearing a strip off the Donald when he took the hump and refused to be questioned by her

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas.

Tinfoil conspiracy theories for weak minded lemmings like yourself. If there was any truth to it the repubtards would have strung the Clintons up in the trees by now. You are a gullible old fool.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Thanks for once again taking my words and repeating them back to me you brainwashed lemming.

Originally Posted by MrG

^
I read it. More unsubstantiated accusations, but PeaNuts still continues to post this shit as if it meant something.

To you and your libtard buddies, who insist on ignoring the truth, it may mean nothing, to right thinking people it says a lot.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas.

Tinfoil conspiracy theories for weak minded lemmings like yourself. If there was any truth to it the repubtards would have strung the Clintons up in the trees by now. You are a gullible old fool.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Thanks for once again taking my words and repeating them back to me you brainwashed lemming.

Did you not post you read nothing from right thinking conservative people?

^ If I did not read them how would I know how full of shit they are? I enjoy a good laugh from time to time.

Most of the crap you post here is commentary, false assumption and outright distortion. It almost always is completely lacking in facts to back up the claims made. That is why it has been said many times that the right lives in a bubble. I have posted countless articles including some from written by Republicans who are shocked at the direction the right has taken.

A decline into insanity.