Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

^ Couldn't make head or tails from your link.

Will play as soon as you prove Manning is detained because he "outed the slag."

As soon as you explain no outrage from the UN, also.

I have don't prove anything. He is being held with no charges still, and one of the key documents was showing Hillary breaking the law. Outing, basically, amongst other things.

I never said anything about the UN - that was in the text I quoted.

You don't need to play to even contribute - it is all in there, direct orders from her desk. Maybe it is better you stick to bite sized interpretations but I would suggest you take them from truthful publications as opposed to the Hillary campaign sponsoring press; cos they's alll be wrong.

Sounds like you support the idea of a criminal being president of the USA; turn a blind eye to her misgivings as long as the press like her heh?

if she decides to run in 2016, she won't face any real competition in the primaries.....she'll have the nomination wrapped up in short order.

republicans, however, will be at each others throats all the way to the convention.

IOW, she'll stroll into the white house in 2016 if she wants it.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Sounds like you support the idea of a criminal being president of the USA; turn a blind eye to her misgivings as long as the press like her heh?

That's basically the crux of it with the Clinton supporters.

The air of corruption & nefarious dealings surrounding both of the Clinton's from Whitewater to present day bespeaks itself.

Originally Posted by raycarey

if she decides to run in 2016, she won't face any real competition in the primaries.....she'll have the nomination wrapped up in short order.

republicans, however, will be at each others throats all the way to the convention.

IOW, she'll stroll into the white house in 2016 if she wants it.

No doubt

Mrs Clinton will get her support from the Latin community (I think they supported her more than Obama when they were running against one another), maybe even more than the 71% Obama received in the last election.

Mrs Clinton will get a greater number of women supporting her than Obama received, because of the GOPs continued War on Women which will be highlighted and magnified by the Clintons in her run.

Mrs Clinton should get the entire LGBT and Black vote because the GOP doesn’t have crap to offer those two groups (but talk).

Mrs Clinton will probably take more than the 73% of the Asian American vote than Obama collected in the last election.

Mrs Clinton will get most all of the male democrats pulling for her.

That leaves crazy old white people and bigots that will not support her run. What’s that? About 39% of the voting public that considers themselves tea party supporters/FOX news watchers/Limbaugh listeners/Drudge Report clickers.

Mrs Clinton will breeze right into the White House.

She is a Faux Democrat, doesn't have the vision of her husband, and she is just an ambitious bitch and she is simply there for the power ride

she reminds me a lot of GW Bush, another intellectual fraud and a "faux republican" who did it to please his father power ego

those 2 characters lack of vision and integrity makes them very dangerous leaders IMO,

They are all "faux" representatives of the people.

Do you not see it as a coincidence that the bush family had 5 terms in office (Daddy Bush had 2 terms with Ronnie as his front man, and one on his own and baby Bush two for himself) and now Clan Clinton gets to up their total? Will Mrs Obama be next? Bush's brother?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

They are all "faux" representatives of the people.

Do you not see it as a coincidence that the bush family had 5 terms in office (Daddy Bush had 2 terms with Ronnie as his front man, and one on his own and baby Bush two for himself) and now Clan Clinton gets to up their total? Will Mrs Obama be next? Bush's brother?

Well, one can only hope for a Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz as a change for the better.

I think US politics needs some transformational leadership to regain it's effectiveness. It has become a partisan quagmire, everything bogged down- even things as routine as civil service appointments. Senate = fillibuster, it is used routinely now. Currently, the US government is horsing around with it's third 'fiscal cliff' in as many years. No substantive legislation can pass through the houses of congress without being tampered with and diluted, to cater to special interests. Lobbyists throw unprecedented amounts of money at politics, and for good reason. It has become abundantly clear that, faced with an unrelentingly obstructionist 'party of no' type opposition, Congress is easily rendered dysfunctional. Some real changes need to be made.

Is Hillary that person? No way- quite the opposite imo. She's the bureaucrats choice. I'm quietly hoping the public gets bored of her, and someone more transformational steps up, who can and will, when required, bypass the mechanisms of the Beltway and get his/her commonsense proposals and vision directly to the public. Obama talks the talk, but amerka needs a bigger version with balls. Michelle?

^
The Mooch???

What you need in the US is to bring a rapid end to this situation



This can never happen. All the decent politicians (and yes there are plenty) will never get through the ranks to a position to be able to make change, and if somehow they do bluuf it to be one of the boys and then turns and bites the hand that is feeding them, they get shot



You need ban lobbying, and arrest for graft any politician who accepts contributions to a campaign from a person of a lobby group.

Elections need to be state funded and capped. Get business out of politics.

Don't laugh- she's the most popular person in US politics -
polling a 73 per cent approval rating in a CNN poll in December, and the publicity blitz shows that the White House has moved on from a time when she was regarded as a political liability.
Read more: Oscars 2013 | Michelle Obama presents Best Picture award

Don't believe much that CNN says though. Owned by this guy

Aviv Nevo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Originally Posted by sabang

Don't laugh- she's the most popular person in US politics -

That is not a resounding endorsement by a long shot. The only reason for those numbers is her name's been out there longer.

we can all hope that she will die by shoking from Bill huge cock,

unlikely to happen though, she would bite it off

she'll be 68 in 2016....a bit old after the recent trend of her husband, GWB and obama.

we'll probably know in about 18 months whether or not she's going to throw her hat in the ring.

btw, a SCOTUS appointment is another distinct possibility for her.

Originally Posted by raycarey

a SCOTUS appointment is another distinct possibility for her.

Indeed. Age about right. Ginsburg is 80. Will Hillary replace her?

kennedy and scalia are both 76.

4 years is a long time.

According to this paper by Ross M. Stolzenberg of the University of Illinois and James Lindgren of Nortwestern University Law School, the odds of a justice dying in office is slightly more than 5% per year, increasing steadily as justice age past 70. About 45% of all Supreme Court justices have died in office, while 47% retired.

Obama Victory Could Spell End Of Conservative Supreme Court - Forbes

Originally Posted by raycarey

kennedy and scalia are both 76.

4 years is a long time.

Ever wondered how these vastly rich and influential people always seem to live so long in full health? It's not unusual to have them working in their 80s. Kissinger is 90 in a handful of weeks, and he is still hanging about the corridors of power. How do they do it?

^They are reptilian. You've read David Icke haven't you?

Originally Posted by S Landreth

It’s a long time before our next presidential election, but it will be nice to rub the republicans face in the dirt for the next several years; with monthly updates, showing them how out of touch they are with the American public.

If you have any problems with the thought of President Hillary Clinton, please feel free: Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship

Contact: HillaryClintonOffice.com

rub

Wisconsin voters would pick Hillary Clinton over their state’s own Scott Walker or Paul Ryan for president in 2016, according to PPP’s latest Wisconsin poll.

Clinton leads Ryan 51% to 43%, Walker 54% to 41% and Marco Rubio 52% to 38%. She has a formidable +19 favorability rating, with 56% of voters holding a favorable opinion to 37% unfavorable. Clinton’s strong numbers stem from her popularity with moderates (71/20) and independent voters (58/34). Ryan’s favorability is evenly split at 46%.

In the GOP primary, Ryan leads with 35% support without Walker included, and Walker leads with 33% support without Ryan in the mix. In both cases Rubio is a close second (27% against Walker, 22% against Ryan) and Chris Christie is a distant third at 10%.

Clinton would beat Walker, Ryan in Wisconsin in 2016

tell me you republican/tea party butt lickers,.........how's that dirt tasting

Hillary Clinton would defeat three potential Republican presidential candidates if the 2016 presidential election were held today, with New Jersey Gov. Christopher Christie second in a field of three Democrats and three Republicans selected by Quinnipiac University for a national poll released today.

Vice President Joseph Biden and New York's Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo would not fare nearly as well, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds.

The Republicans tested also include Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.

Former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State Clinton wins easily against any of the Republicans, topping Christie 45 - 37 percent; leading Rubio 50 - 34 percent and besting Ryan 50 - 38 percent.

The GOP is outa touch

By an 88 - 10 percent margin, including 85 - 13 percent among voters in households with guns, American voters support background checks for all gun buyers. Voters also support 54 - 41 percent a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons and back 54 - 42 percent a nationwide ban on the sale of ammunition magazines with more than 10 rounds.

Originally Posted by S Landreth

if the 2016 presidential election were held today

But but it's not going to happen for 3 more years. Nice newsy info but until the eve of election day opinions will change. Not to say polls won't indicate she will win by even a greater margin on election eve.