Printable View
^In defense of his purchasing branded apparel abroad, yesterday Trump made the claim that he could not source baseball caps made in the USA so he had to have them made in China. A quick Google search of baseball hat manufacturers shows that claim to be totally false.
According to one poll. CNN has polled his support at 8%. Believe what you want but once Sanders stops hammering her and starts campaigning against Trump that number will shrink further and only the pea brained misfits and crackpots will end up supporting him.Quote:
Originally Posted by longway
Here on earth, Trump's baseball caps are made in the USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Sorry to say but you've confused integrity with an opinion that you don't like. You're better off not trying to be clever.Quote:
Originally Posted by wjblaney
Anyone heard of this? And don't shoot the messenger.....
CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel
CNN Money’s “fact-checkers” Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel ended up with egg on their faces on Wednesday after they rated as “false” a well-established and proven Clinton Cash fact involving Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. approving the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to the Russian government, as nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.
Under the guise of “fact-checking” Donald Trump’s Wednesday speech, Alesci and Frankel purported to verify whether “Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20% of America’s uranium holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.”
CNN?s Clinton Cash ?Fact-Check? Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel - Breitbart
^Bullshit. Read the summary I posted. You really are a superficial idiot. Breitbart indeed.
https://teakdoor.com/speakers-corner/...dates-240.html post #5986
Already debunked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Clinton had absolutely no input to the decision.
Clinton Cash is just another part of the right wing benghazi/whitewater/emails ongoing smear campaign.
I'm not challenging you - but it's fair for you to put up a link to show your claim.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaAlready debunked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Clinton had absolutely no input to the decision.
Clinton Cash is just another part of the right wing benghazi/whitewater/emails ongoing smear campaign.
I do want to know what the truth is.
^ Read up in the thread. Do you expect others to do your homework?
How about you fact-check your own links for a change instead of just slavishly cut 'n pasting them and then expecting everyone else to do your research for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Then I would suggest you read up on topics to establish the truth before you post bullshit, you stupid twat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold PizzaI'm not challenging you - but it's fair for you to put up a link to show your claim.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaAlready debunked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Clinton had absolutely no input to the decision.
Clinton Cash is just another part of the right wing benghazi/whitewater/emails ongoing smear campaign.
I do want to know what the truth is.
No, I should not share my opinion, esp. when I imply or claim it's the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrG
Its all just pure coincidence. People who give her foundation huge amounts of money cant be doing so because they think it helps their cause, even when they give it shortly before their names will turn up in a committee where she is the ranking member and a word from her could blow the whole deal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold PizzaI'm not challenging you - but it's fair for you to put up a link to show your claim.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaAlready debunked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Clinton had absolutely no input to the decision.
Clinton Cash is just another part of the right wing benghazi/whitewater/emails ongoing smear campaign.
I do want to know what the truth is.
And even though its been happening for years, and involves hundreds of millions of dollars from all sorts of lobbying and special interest groups. It cant be because they want something from her. C'mon that would mean she can be bought, and that's just not possible is it? After all, thats what she said, and she would never lie.
^The committee was headed by treasury. It was also approved by the Canadian government. Please give some proof of conspiracy. You are drawing a conclusion that you cannot prove.
^ it's not a one off, is it? It's a pattern lasting years, with many many people, who want something, that give money to her foundation, and then get it.
^That's Peter Schweizer's agrument but even he admits that all these suspicions cannot be proven. They remain speculation. Many countries, companies and individuals have given to the Clinton Foundation, that in itself is not proof of influence peddling. You can have legitimate concerns about the account keeping of the Clinton Foundation prior to Donna Shalala coming onboard but the books are open to anyone's scrutiny now. What cannot be proven is that Hillary Clinton's decision making as Secretary of State was influenced by donations to the Clinton Foundation despite concerns by some arising about where the money came from.
Bernie still not withdrawing from the campaign. I think he can bring most of the Bernie or Bust voters on for Clinton by explaining what a disaster electing Trump would be for America.
Sanders Says He Will Vote for Clinton
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders told MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Friday that he will vote for Hillary Clinton in the upcoming November general elections.
The senator said stopping Donald Trump from entering the White House as president is one of his goals.
“Yes. The issue right here is I’m going to do everything I can to defeat Donald Trump. I think Trump in so many ways would be a disaster if he were elected president,” he said.
Sanders continues to campaign and speak at rallies across the nation even though Clinton secured early in June the number of delegates needed to become the Democratic Party nominee. He dismissed the idea that he should withdraw before the Democratic Convention.
“Why would I not want to do what we can when I want to fight to make sure that we have the best platform that we possibly can,” Sanders said insisting that his presence aimed to involve the American people in the political process.
Sanders Says He Will Vote for Clinton
As well he should. His platform appeals to the young. To get support from this important sector of the electorate, the DNC must adopt some of Bernie's messages. Not just for the Presidential race but perhaps more importantly for Congressional elections. Clinton becoming Pres without gaining a Dem majority in the house or senate will only result in an other 4 years of political gridlock.Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaAlready debunked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Pizza
Clinton had absolutely no input to the decision.
Clinton Cash is just another part of the right wing benghazi/whitewater/emails ongoing smear campaign.
You have proof Clinton had no input in the decision,she was the head of the state department. Do you really think she had no influence on the state department employee who voted?
The State Department voted for the sale, isn't it obvious. What conspiracy does that prove. You really are an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
I never said it was proven, I pointed out a pattern lasting years.
And if you want to sell your influence in a way that makes it very difficult to prove any wrongdoing then her foundation is a good design.
Let's just introduce a few facts and then you can fuck off with your bullshit story.
Quote:
Even if Clinton had wanted to make sure the sale was approved, it wouldn't have been possible for her to do it on her own. CFIUS is made up of not only the Secretary of State, but also the secretaries of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, and Energy, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor are non-voting members, and CFIUS's work is also observed by representatives of other agencies like the National Security Council and the Office of Management and Budget. The idea that Clinton could have convinced all those officials and all those departments to change their position on the sale, even if she had wanted to, borders on the absurd.
Furthermore, the official who was the State Department's representative on CFIUS at the time, Jose Hernandez, told Time magazine that Clinton did not participate in the evaluation of this deal: "Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter," he said.
^Yes, but the idea that The Clinton Foundation is a devious machine designed to line the Clinton's pockets by selling influence is a lot more exciting.:rolleyes:
It's Repeater and wrongway...facts are irrelevant.
She doesn't need to change their position dimwit, she just has to decide against it and she can tell the president veto it.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Not so much a strawman, more like your head is filled with straw.