Well duh, obviously its a tactic, but it goes well beyond appealing to Cruzbots, its all part of chipping away at her identity, she is being taken apart piece by piece and she still doesn't realise it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Printable View
Well duh, obviously its a tactic, but it goes well beyond appealing to Cruzbots, its all part of chipping away at her identity, she is being taken apart piece by piece and she still doesn't realise it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Well you won the strawman argument, congratulations on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
I have made an insurance bet on Biden becoming the nominee, and also one of Warren being VP. If Shillary gets the nomination, I will increase my stakes on Trump, depending on her VP pick; Shillary needs a major change in strategy to counter Trump, but it looks like she is hellbent at throwing herself face first into his traps currently.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
Alternatively you are betting with your heart and not with your head.
Bernie is such a sore fucking loser. He's millions of votes behind, hundreds of delegates behind, and now he's doing a Trump and threatening everyone.
Methinks he's shot his bolt.
If I wanted the easy way out I'd offer to pray for you as that is literally the least thing one can do.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
I was pointing out that refuting your drivel with factual analysis is a fool's errand and I'm not going to waste any more time on it. I shall point and laugh instead as I watch you and your mendacious ilk become ever less relevant.
Not where money is concerned. :sexy:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
What Shillary and her surrogates have done to Sanders is nothing short of incredible in its wanton self-destructiveness. Very short sighted and arrogant. I watched the videos of Nevada convention, a Senator Boxer made a very condescending speech to the people there and then went to CNN can claimed to be very frightened.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n9J0OIWAJs
Watch this video of her leaving the convention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVgNrqnoVX8
When they are going to such lengths to alienate people they need; I just don't know what to say, but I do see an opportunity to make some cash. They seem to be try to goad him into staying in the race, its all so twisted.
Maybe to you and your buddies but you may see it differently come novemberQuote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaI'd say that since he's a conservative god botherer, it's just a shitty opinion piece and is about as worthless as a Focks News "poll".Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65That's all you have. Can you refute the talking points, maybe even try?Quote:
Originally Posted by slackula
That really should be enough.
Not my drivel, I only posted an opinion by Wayne Allen Root, that seems to get closer to reality everyday, one only need look at the current polls, and the results of the recent democratic primaries to see the democrats are finally coming to there senses. People like you are at a point you are desperately grasping at straws to find something to keep your hopes up.Quote:
Originally Posted by slackula
Exactly. Just a cut 'n paste opinion piece that you add nothing to, expect others to refute, and offer nothing yourself other than your continuing disingenuous and spurious 'questions'.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
A laughable buffoon. Fitting that you would be quoting his BS. The man is a clown but I guess that is why you follow him. Like minded clowns.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
Clinton wins Washington State.
Come on Bernie, you're done for, just get behind the nominee you silly old fool.
Maybe she'll give you Wasserman-Schulz's job.
^
I guess Snub did not vote then, or maybe he did for Shillary. :)
I hear that a State Dept. inquiry has sharply criticized Clinton for using her personal computer for official business.
How significant is this ? A game-changer ? A chance for Sanders ?
^ Nothing more than an admonition, slap-on-the-wrist, don't-do-it-again, I should think.
The State Department watchdog, in an extensive and detailed report, accused Hillary Clinton of flouting federal records rules and cybersecurity guidelines with her exclusive use of personal email for government business while secretary of state.
ADVERTISEMENT
The forthcoming audit, a copy of which was obtained by FoxNews.com, faults Clinton and her predecessors for poorly managing email and other computer information.
The report says the department was "slow to recognize and to manage effectively the legal requirements and cybersecurity risks associated with electronic data communications." It cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" related to communications that started before Clinton's tenure.
But the report singles out Clinton’s failures as more serious. The report includes numerous revelations, including that her server was at one point “attacked,” that Clinton declined to be interviewed for the audit and that Clinton never sought approval to use her personal account for government work.
The audit comes as Clinton, now the Democratic presidential front-runner, tries to wrap up a grueling primary battle and pivot to a general election fight -- the audit could provide her Republican foes with fresh ammunition.
Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said in a written statement that her political opponents “are sure to misrepresent this report for their own partisan purposes” but maintained the report shows “how consistent her email practices were with those of other Secretaries and senior officials at the State Department who also used personal email.”
But while the report said there were many examples of staff using personal accounts for official business, they could only find three cases where officials used non-department accounts “on an exclusive basis for day-to-day operations”: former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Ambassador to Kenya Jonathan Scott Gration and Clinton.
In the case of Gration, the department initiated disciplinary action against him before he resigned. The IG report said of Gration, “the Department’s response to his actions demonstrates how such usage is normally handled when Department cybersecurity officials become aware of it.”
The report noted that by the time Clinton took the helm of the department, internal guidance was “considerably more detailed and more sophisticated.”
Yet, the report said, “Secretary Clinton used mobile devices to conduct official business using the personal email account on her private server extensively, as illustrated by the 55,000 pages of material making up the approximately 30,000 emails she provided to the Department in December 2014.” The report said investigators found “no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server.”
The report specifically accused Clinton of violating department policy by not giving over emails when she left office.
The report says: "Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records ... At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department's policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."
The report touched on the security risks of this set-up as well, saying that in January 2011, a “non-Departmental advisor to President Clinton who provided technical support to the Clinton email system” told a department official he had to shut down the server because he thought someone was “trying to hack us.” The adviser later wrote that same day, “We were attacked again so I shut [the server] down for a few min.”
While some officials said they were unaware of the extent of Clinton’s personal email use, the report said they found evidence “that various staff and senior officials throughout the Department had discussions related to the Secretary’s use of non-Departmental systems, suggesting there was some awareness of Secretary Clinton’s practices.”
The review came after revelations Clinton exclusively used a private email account and server while in office. Clinton is now the likely Democratic presidential nominee.
The audit comes as the FBI is thought to be nearing the final phases of its own investigation into Clinton’s email use as secretary of state.
Republicans seized on the report to challenge Clinton’s repeated claims that she was only following precedent.
"Although Clinton has long claimed her practices were like those of other Secretaries of State and allowed, the report states she was in clear violation of the Federal Records Act,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement.
Democrats, though, jumped to her defense. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., top Democrat on the House oversight committee, said in a statement: “The Inspector General confirmed what we have known all along – that Secretary Clinton followed the practice of her predecessor when she used a personal email account. … Republicans need to stop wasting taxpayer dollars singling out Secretary Clinton just because she is running for President.”
The OIG made eight recommendations, including “enhanced and more frequent guidance on the permissible use of personal email accounts to conduct official business.”
The report, further, said Clinton “declined OIG’s request for an interview.” The office was able to interview others including Powell and sitting Secretary of State John Kerry.
The report said the department issued “numerous warnings” about security risks across multiple tenures.
In March 2009, after unsuccessful efforts to supply Clinton with a secure government smartphone, a top official sent her a classified memo about her use of the BlackBerry. Clinton told the official she “gets it,” while apparently continuing to use it.
State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the agency is "already working" to improve its email and records management system.
Toner said "it is clear that the department could have done a better job preserving emails and records of secretaries of state and their senior staff going back several administrations." He said the State Department also agrees that compliance with its rules has been "inconsistent across several administrations."
On another front, Romanian hacker Guccifer – who recently claimed he breached Clinton’s server – pleaded guilty in federal court on Wednesday to separate hacking charges.
Under a deal struck with the federal government, he has agreed to cooperate with federal authorities in the future. The plea agreement does not mention the FBI investigation of Clinton's email practices or his claims that he accessed her private server in March 2013. Such agreements typically do not stipulate how a defendant will aid the government.
Fox News’ Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
To you anyone who does not spew the same garbage as you is a laughable baffoon, nothing new from you.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
Do you think the super delegates will still vote for her if she continues to slump in the polls against Trump? That's the only thing that gives her such a big lead at the moment. Their votes don't matter until the convention. Bernie is smart for staying in the race.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
The Democrats caucus in Washington state and Bernie won that in a landslide and that is where all the delegates are assigned. The primary is meaningless.Quote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppers
As far as choosing delegates you are correct, however the primary shows a much closer look at the will of the people of Washington, 230,000 voted at the caucus as opposed to 650,000 in the primary.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
The ballot was split by party lines. Democrats could give a shit about the primary it doesn't count. I used my ballot as kindling to start my BBQ. Retard. So what that a bunch of clueless stumbling fox news Neanderthals where able to pull themselves off the couch and mail in a ballot. A far cry from actually taking part in a Caucus.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
What you just posted is meaningless not many democrats are into Fox News so how is tha relevant,what was said is in the primaries mail in democrats were in favor of Clinton. Not talking about dems. and republicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
Poor snubby will be in tears when Bernie finally fucks off with his tail between his legs.
^ It aint over yet, Sanders is neck and neck with Clinton in California.
If Sanders wins California it will be a game changer for Hillary.:yup:
Bernie Sanders Closes In on Hillary Clinton Ahead of California Primary
You're not very bright are you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Earl
It's not a winner take all state.
It simply means Clinton edges nearer to the nomination, and Bernie's miniscule chances of winning recede even further.
You can have a bet if you want.
Bernie is 10/1 against and Clinton 1/25.
Not much of a two-horse race.
:chitown: