Printable View
You clearly didn't follow what happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
But of course you do have understanding of it all?
Obama had no stand on the Syrian red line decision, he simply ran his mouth on something he had no desire to back up.
Ultimately, the threat resulted in Assad handing over all of his chemical weapons.
You are obviously just another "Bomb Anything" merchant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaYou clearly didn't follow what happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
But of course you do have understanding of it all?
Obama had no stand on the Syrian red line decision, he simply ran his mouth on something he had no desire to back up.
Ultimately, the threat resulted in Assad handing over all of his chemical weapons.
You are obviously just another "Bomb Anything" merchant.
You know nothing about what I stand for, I have never said anything about bombing, there were many other things that could have been done for Obama to stand his ground on the line in the sand. He did nothing to back up his talk, nothing, all he did was make himself a laughing stalk in front of the whole world.
Maybe this will help you understand the situation more clearly.
Syria's Chemical Disarmament Mirage - WSJ
www.wsj.com › articles › syrias-chemical...
no most of the world believes Obama has done a good job turning around the mess left by the GOP and Bush. Most of the world now thinks Americans are idiots based on the possible GOP candidates for president. Cruz and Trump, no way I could ever explain that to my non US friends. Many of my conservative America friends dont believe it themselves. In all honesty JPeters you are one of two people I know who could support either of those candidates.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
No, I don't support either of those candidates. Trump has won a lot of support from the American people only because he is not an insider in D.C. and I can sympathies with them but Trump is not the man for the job. I think Cruz is quite capable as he has experience in the government and has enough smarts but I don't think he would take on the status quo of how D.C. works. If the democrats had not decided to move the U.S. towards a socialistic government and we're not so anti Christian I could probably support a moderate candidate from them. It could not however be Hillary she carries to much baggage and I think most of that baggage is true. The truth is I am stuck somewhere in between, I would like to see someone take on the mega corporations and at the same time preserve the freedoms that we Americans have always had.scary days ahead for the America I grew up in and love.Quote:
Originally Posted by aging one
Perhaps one day you might learn to post a fucking link.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaYou clearly didn't follow what happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
But of course you do have understanding of it all?
Obama had no stand on the Syrian red line decision, he simply ran his mouth on something he had no desire to back up.
Ultimately, the threat resulted in Assad handing over all of his chemical weapons.
You are obviously just another "Bomb Anything" merchant.
You know nothing about what I stand for, I have never said anything about bombing, there were many other things that could have been done for Obama to stand his ground on the line in the sand. He did nothing to back up his talk, nothing, all he did was make himself a laughing stalk in front of the whole world.
Maybe this will help you understand the situation more clearly.
Syria's Chemical Disarmament Mirage - WSJ
The Wall Street Journal & Breaking News, Business, Financial and Economic News, World News and Video › articles › syrias-chemical...
You know, like this:
Link
Sanders gets a different kind of protester.
The guy on the right is thinking "Best.Rally.Ever".
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1013.jpg
WOW! Not a post I would have expected from you. You get a well earned green.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65No, I don't support either of those candidates. Trump has won a lot of support from the American people only because he is not an insider in D.C. and I can sympathies with them but Trump is not the man for the job. I think Cruz is quite capable as he has experience in the government and has enough smarts but I don't think he would take on the status quo of how D.C. works. If the democrats had not decided to move the U.S. towards a socialistic government and we're not so anti Christian I could probably support a moderate candidate from them. It could not however be Hillary she carries to much baggage and I think most of that baggage is true. The truth is I am stuck somewhere in between, I would like to see someone take on the mega corporations and at the same time preserve the freedoms that we Americans have always had.scary days ahead for the America I grew up in and love.Quote:
Originally Posted by aging one
What ever they worked before.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaPerhaps one day you might learn to post a fucking link.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaYou clearly didn't follow what happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
But of course you do have understanding of it all?
Obama had no stand on the Syrian red line decision, he simply ran his mouth on something he had no desire to back up.
Ultimately, the threat resulted in Assad handing over all of his chemical weapons.
You are obviously just another "Bomb Anything" merchant.
You know nothing about what I stand for, I have never said anything about bombing, there were many other things that could have been done for Obama to stand his ground on the line in the sand. He did nothing to back up his talk, nothing, all he did was make himself a laughing stalk in front of the whole world.
Maybe this will help you understand the situation more clearly.
Syria's Chemical Disarmament Mirage - WSJ
The Wall Street Journal & Breaking News, Business, Financial and Economic News, World News and Video › articles › syrias-chemical...
You know, like this:
Link
Good one Harry :smileylaughing:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
None of which has actually occurred in reality (or anywhere outside of the right-wing echo-chamber).Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
I was so shocked that he said he would consider voting for a Dem that I completely overlooked that idiotic sentence.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Death, taxes, and Repeater posting something dumb.
The only certainties in this life. :D
The "Don" apparently has a very murky past!
A Mafia Don with a Pompadour | New Eastern Outlook
Why would you be shocked that I could consider voting for a democrat, I have stated more than once that I have no political party affiliation.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnubI was so shocked that he said he would consider voting for a Dem that I completely overlooked that idiotic sentence.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
You are only kidding yourself if you think modern day democrats are not pushing for a socialistic, or as you prefer to say, democratic socialist government.
It is quite obvious, with all the law suits involving Christians and their beliefs, the modern day democrats are at least somewhat anti Christian.
The lawsuits are almost 100% to stop militant god bothering bigots imposing their religious beliefs on others.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
No one gives a shit what Christians want to believe in, but they do give a shit when Christians think they can tell others what they should do.
Name one instance.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
What utter paranoid blather.
What you fail to address is that the law suits are mostly about forcing Christians to do things that violate their beliefs.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaThe lawsuits are almost 100% to stop militant god bothering bigots imposing their religious beliefs on others.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
No one gives a shit what Christians want to believe in, but they do give a shit when Christians think they can tell others what they should do.
Fining a baker in Washington state for refusing to participate in an activity that violates her Christian faith.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrG
You call it paranoid blather because you are a non believer.
We have had this discussion in the past, we disagree I was stating my thoughts on the supporting candidates for the presidency. You have your ideas and I have mine, move on.
From Democrats Abroad:
The results are in! In an unprecedented turnout, up 50% from 2008, 34,570 voters cast their ballots from over 170 countries all around the world, through in person voting, by fax, email, and post, and the results are as follows:
Bernie Sanders received 69% of the vote in the Democrats Abroad’s Global Presidential Primary, Hillary Clinton 31%.
Sanders picks up 9 pledged delegates as a result of the primary, while Clinton secures an additional 4 delegates.
What you fail to understand is that in almost every case it is to stop god botherers discriminating against people on the basis of a book of ancient fairy tales.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65What you fail to address is that the law suits are mostly about forcing Christians to do things that violate their beliefs.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaThe lawsuits are almost 100% to stop militant god bothering bigots imposing their religious beliefs on others.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
No one gives a shit what Christians want to believe in, but they do give a shit when Christians think they can tell others what they should do.
In which bit of the Bible does it say a baker can't make a fucking cake for a couple of gays getting married then?Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Fining a baker in Washington state for refusing to participate in an activity that violates her Christian faith.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrG
EXCRETUS 3:16?
There was a simple solution. Stick to making cakes for her god botherer friends and don't open a public store.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracudaIn which bit of the Bible does it say a baker can't make a fucking cake for a couple of gays getting married then?Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Fining a baker in Washington state for refusing to participate in an activity that violates her Christian faith.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrG
EXCRETUS 3:16?
There was a simple solution. Stick to making cakes for her god botherer friends and don't open a public store.
I thought even your limited brain power would have been able to figure it out, I was wrong. God,through his words from the bible,prohibit homosexuality thus participating,or being part of a homosexual wedding would be a violation of her Christian faith. How can that be so hard to understand. The lady was forcing nothing on the two men, nothing at all, she in know way tried to stop them from marrying, choosing not to be part of that wedding.
What makes you think she or any of her friends are God botherers, she has done nothing to interfere with anybody's plans,
What you are saying is, because of her beliefs she has no right to own a bakery making you the real God botherer.
Do you believe that people who work on a Sunday should be put to death?Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
Exodus 35:2
Quote:
New International Version
For six days, work is to be done, but the seventh day shall be your holy day, a day of sabbath rest to the LORD. Whoever does any work on it is to be put to death.
New Living Translation
You have six days each week for your ordinary work, but the seventh day must be a Sabbath day of complete rest, a holy day dedicated to the LORD. Anyone who works on that day must be put to death.
English Standard Version
Six days work shall be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a Sabbath of solemn rest, holy to the LORD. Whoever does any work on it shall be put to death.
New American Standard Bible
"For six days work may be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a holy day, a sabbath of complete rest to the LORD; whoever does any work on it shall be put to death.
King James Bible
Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you an holy day, a sabbath of rest to the LORD: whosoever doeth work therein shall be put to death.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
For six days work is to be done, but on the seventh day you are to have a holy day, a Sabbath of complete rest to the LORD. Anyone who does work on it must be executed.
International Standard Version
For six days work is to be done, but on the seventh day you are to have a holy day, a Sabbath of complete rest in dedication to the LORD. Anyone who does work on that day is to be executed.
NET Bible
In six days work may be done, but on the seventh day there must be a holy day for you, a Sabbath of complete rest to the LORD. Anyone who does work on it will be put to death.
GOD'S WORD® Translation
You may work for six days, but the seventh day is a holy day of worship, a day when you don't work. It is dedicated to the LORD. Whoever does any work on this day should be put to death.
JPS Tanakh 1917
Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you a holy day, a sabbath of solemn rest to the LORD; whosoever doeth any work therein shall be put to death.
New American Standard 1977
“For six days work may be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a holy day, a sabbath of complete rest to the LORD; whoever does any work on it shall be put to death.
Jubilee Bible 2000
Six days shall work be done, but the seventh day shall be holy unto you, a sabbath of rest to the LORD; whoever does work therein shall die.
King James 2000 Bible
Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day it shall be to you a holy day, a sabbath of rest to the LORD: whosoever does work on it shall be put to death.
American King James Version
Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you an holy day, a sabbath of rest to the LORD: whoever does work therein shall be put to death.
American Standard Version
Six days shall work be done; but on the seventh day there shall be to you a holy day, a sabbath of solemn rest to Jehovah: whosoever doeth any work therein shall be put to death.
Douay-Rheims Bible
Six days you shall do work: the seventh day shall be holy unto you, the sabbath, and the rest of the Lord: he that shall do any work on it, shall be put to death.
Darby Bible Translation
Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you a holy day, a sabbath of rest to Jehovah: whoever does work on it shall be put to death.
English Revised Version
Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be to you an holy day, a sabbath of solemn rest to the LORD: whosoever doeth any work therein shall be put to death.
Webster's Bible Translation
Six days shall work be done; but on the seventh day there shall be to you a holy day, a sabbath of rest to the LORD: whoever doth work therein shall be put to death.
World English Bible
'Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day there shall be a holy day for you, a Sabbath of solemn rest to Yahweh: whoever does any work in it shall be put to death.
Young's Literal Translation
Six days is work done, and on the seventh day there is to you a holy day, a sabbath of rest to Jehovah; any who doeth work in it is put to death;
She can have a bakery but she has no right to refuse offering a customer service because of her belief.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
It's the law. Upheld by courts in her state and all others.
Nothing to do with Democrat's.
^ Well it is, as anti discrimination laws based on sexual orientation needed to be put in place, and these trump religious freedom laws, so this is why Christians feel under siege.
both groups need to look for compromises IMO for a truly diverse society.