More like her intelligence and power . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Hitlary? Really? Smacks of a very low-level of intelligence . . . as for the rest - a misogynist of the worst kind - is he attracted to Trump?
Printable View
More like her intelligence and power . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Hitlary? Really? Smacks of a very low-level of intelligence . . . as for the rest - a misogynist of the worst kind - is he attracted to Trump?
Hey, Y'all! See where it's over 60 classified emails uncovered so far?
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2015/08/991.jpg
The Hilldog is going down! :D
http://www.zombietime.com/really_tru...larysmall1.jpg
Number of Hillary Clinton's emails flagged for classified data grows to 60 as review continues - Washington Times
I'm trying to decide which I dislike more - criminals or Demtard hypocrites. She's both.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Allegedly.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaker
Sounds good to me, divide the dems.Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
Using "Demtard" definitely gives gravitas to your political opinions, you should stick with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaker
Of course, every scandal is bigger than Watergate (until the next one), and Hildebeast is going down because she's a biatch, a democrat, a lesbian, and a clinton. A nice big, juicy bone for the feverswamp dwellers to masturbate on and masticate over- or is it the other way around? But now for the real world. "Among the first 60 flagged emails, nearly all contained classified secrets at the lowest level of “confidential” and one contained information at the intermediate level of “secret,” officials told the Times". (Taken from booners moonie owned rag above, hardly the epitome' of quality journalism.) They'll need more than that, a lot more, to derail the Hillary bid. The lowest level of "Confidential" is a joke- heck, you can even read so called confidential information on a board like this. Lets see if they can uncover any actual "Secret" classified stuff from her Emails- this 'scandal' may yet have legs.
What part of "confidential" do you not understand?Quote:
Originally Posted by sabang
In US government parlance, that means unless you are cleared to at least a "confidential" level, you aren't supposed to have access to it.
Her entire server was not cleared to the basic "confidential" level. That alone was a violation of US security regulations.
This isn't going to be swept under a Persian rug in upstate New York.
================
Judge orders State Department to probe Hillary Clinton’s ‘personal’ emails
By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - Thursday, August 13, 2015
A federal judge ordered the State Department on Thursday to work with the FBI to get access to the 32,000 emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said were personal and that she didn’t return to the government, as the courts get more deeply involved in the Democratic presidential front-runner’s email practices.
One judge is trying to decide how the government is going about determining what classified information is included in Mrs. Clinton’s messages, while another is exploring the email practices of Mrs. Clinton’s top aides, as the State Department deals with a backlog of requests for her communications, which she only recently returned to the administration.
Responding to a judge’s order, the State Department instructed Mrs. Clinton and aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills to save all “federal documents, electronic or otherwise, in her possession or control,” and to assure the government that none of them will be deleted.
Those instructions were sent Aug. 10 — a day before Mrs. Clinton announced through her campaign that she would turn the server she used for email during her time as secretary over to federal investigators, who were already looking into whether classified information was being stored in an insecure manner on the server or a flash drive held by her personal lawyer.
Judge orders Hillary Clinton to preserve all records; she misses deadline to certify compliance - Washington Times
Please do note that UK taxpayers pay for that fun ride and do have some eQuote:
Originally Posted by VocalNeal
It is not free. Someone always pays
Levin: ?Sect. 793 of Penal Code ... Is What Hillary Clinton Has to Worry About?
“Section 793 of the Penal Code, Subsection (f)...is what Hillary Clinton has to worry about,” nationally syndicated radio show host Staff Mark Levin said on his
Wednesday broadcast during a legal analysis of Clinton’s use of a private server while she was secretary of state.
“My point is when you set up an unsecured server in your barn adjacent to your home in Chappaqua, New York, you have intentionally – forget about negligence – you have intentionally bypassed the security process for that server,” said Levin, a former chief of staff at the Justice Department.
Here is the transcript of what Levin had to say:“I want to read to you Section 793 of the Penal Code, Subsection (f), because this is what Hillary Clinton – among other things, but this in particular – is what Hillary Clinton has to worry about.
"Here’s the law: ‘Whoever being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note or information relating to the national defense …”
"By the way, this is part of what’s called the Espionage Act.
“Subset one: ‘... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust or to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed ...’
“Got that? I’ll get to the next section later. I’m hearing on TV: ‘It depends on her intent, it depends on her intent.’ No it doesn’t, not with respect to this, Subsection (f).
Or two, “… having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust or lost or stolen or abstracted…” and so forth.
“So here’s her problem. Subsection one: “… through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody …’
“The entire server was not supposed to be – it turns out it’s in her barn. She has a barn on her property. So any classified information, including top-secret information, which is the highest of the classified information, Code Black top-secret information.
“I was read into these programs. I was trained. I can’t remember everything, I don’t have them now and by the way, it’s a lifetime requirement that you keep this information secret. It’s not like you leave the administration and you go blabbing about it. No. You can’t. You can never talk about it unless it’s been declassified.
“But let me underscore this again. It really is in plain English. Section 793, you can Google it yourself, of the Penal Code, Subsection (f): 'Whoever being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book…' and so forth and so on.
“… through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust or to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed.”
“And I want to stop there because my point is when you set up an unsecured server in your barn adjacent to your home in Chappaqua, New York, you have intentionally – forget about negligence – you have intentionally bypassed the security process for that server.
“Now, that’s a higher standard. Let’s move it to the lower standard, which is still a crime.
"Let’s say you didn’t think or didn’t know that you were intentionally bypassing the process that is used to secure that server and that information, which seems absurd to me, but let’s play along.
“Okay, if you do it through gross negligence, you permit the same to be removed from its proper place. So I would argue to you, when that server was removed and information was flowing through it, including classified and especially top-secret information, boom. You did it.
“And every time that happened, ladies and gentlemen, that’s considered a count. You don’t aggregate at all. Every time that happened, that’s considered a violation of the statute.
“Now what’s the penalty if you’re found guilty? ‘Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years or both.’ I didn’t check the fine, but I’m sure it’s substantial. Ten or 20 grand a violation.
“Now this is why typically the Justice Department, through the Public Integrity Section or the U.S. attorney’s office, would direct the FBI to get involved because of the potential criminality of what took place regardless of who the person is.”
What part of simple reading comprehension do you not understand chucky? My post is self explanatory. If the investigation fails to unearth anything more than the lowest (and mostly farcical) security rating of "Confidential", I predict it will fall flat on it's face ultimately- at least in terms of it's impact on the Presidential race. If however she has sent information over an insecure network with existing higher security classification, her candidacy could be in peril. I await with bated breath, yawwn. In the meantime, there's always benghazi. I would quite like to see Hilly toppled, incidentally- the next President will be a Democrat regardless. Might be a good time for Joe Biden to announce a tilt.
In her position, she should have known better. Couldn't trust a president who is open to blackmail. This is also epic fail for her security people. More I know about it, more unreal it sounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by sabang
Are you talking about me? I was offered huge money by George Soros and The Illuminati to come here and start posting. They said they didn't care what I posted as long as I made fun of the libtards on this site.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
They think the libtards here are an em-bare-ass-ment to the movement, being so unedumencated and all. They want you Hillary and Barry lickers shut down.
Conservative: Because not everyone can be on the dole.
Conservatives: propagating baseless and crass stereotypes since forever.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaker
Right. Conservatives. The ones who got London into the mess it's in with its unchecked immigration and benefits for every freeloader who waltzes up to the border. The same ones who have managed the failed NHS while driving taxes through the roof for real workers. The ones who gave away national sovereignty to an unelected group.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
The ones who got Australia into the mess it's in by giving the store away to China and by failing to develop its own manufacturing to use its own natural resources to create jobs. The ones with the huge unemployment and worthless money due to liberals running the store.
Wait. I think that was liberals with their pipe dreams and their own talking points.
You clearly are failing to do your job then.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaker
What discussions? You regurgitating cliched talking points is not much of a discussion.Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckd
Clearly you know nothing other than what fox news told you about the occupy movement.Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckd
Conservatives: blaming everyone else for problems since forever.Quote:
Originally Posted by JBakerRight. Conservatives. The ones who got London into the mess it's in with its unchecked immigration and benefits for every freeloader who waltzes up to the border. The same ones who have managed the failed NHS while driving taxes through the roof for real workers. The ones who gave away national sovereignty to an unelected group.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
The ones who got Australia into the mess it's in by giving the store away to China and by failing to develop its own manufacturing to use its own natural resources to create jobs. The ones with the huge unemployment and worthless money due to liberals running the store.
Wait. I think that was liberals with their pipe dreams and their own talking points.
Of course. They love to forget about the havoc that they have created. Trickle down economics, massive Bush era tax cuts that are still ballooning the debt (that they love to try to blame Obama), starting the most disastrous war in American history that so far has destabilized the entire middle east and is the soul reason that ISIS was created.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Is there even one conservative success story? I sure cant think of one unless you are a member of the 1%.
Fox news watching geriatrics who's minds are constantly poured full of propaganda.
But also making sure our children have a futureQuote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Are you saying that my children's future will be owed to conservatives?Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Strategy
If so then you're quite mistaken.
You ask average Joe, he or she wants a job? Even if it is trickle down, it's money they would not have otherwise. Only euro socialist hellholes pay for failures so go there and eat sand or whatever they do.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
THE STORY OF SOCIALISM in one Bernie Sanders T-Shirt.
Bernie Sanders T-Shirts :: The Future of Capitalism
Heh...no shit, Sherlock...:chitown:
A completely failed economic policy that actually did the exact opposite of what Reagen claimed it would do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Strategy
Don't be stuck on Stupid your entire life there bstub. Ronald Maximus brought down the Berlin Wall. He eliminated Jimmy Carter's 18% interest rates/inflation and brought forth the best recovery America has ever seen.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
What has Choomboy done, eh?:chitown: