Thread: Another US Embassy Under Siege

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It was important 9/11/12.

It was?

In the words of the immortal Myron Cohen "everyone's got to be someplace".

^What is Obama's job again? POTUS. The country was under attack.

Apparently he wasn't doing his job.

^And what does his location have to do with this? Your point was about his location. He's not a drill press operator is he?

Originally Posted by Humbert

^And what does his location have to do with this? Your point was about his location.

Obama abandoned those men to get a good nights sleep before jetting off to Vegas, baby!

You see, he needed his rest to campaign, not to do his job...

^then we would know what he a was doing. His location was well publicized when he invaded Pakistan and assassinated OBL.

But what was he doing exactly about the terrorist attack on Benghazi? It's in his job description to deal with such crises. If he wasn't doing his job, what was he doing?

So, somehow his location determines if he was doing something that meets some bar you have set for engagement? Strange obsession you exhibit here Earl. What should his location have been? You are making the assumption that he was not handling the crisis appropriately because he was in a location that you have not been made aware of. Very odd.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Obama abandoned those men to get a good nights sleep before jetting off to Vegas, baby!

I guess he should have donned his Ironman costume and flown off to Libya to deliver a knock out punch to those nasty villains himself. Funny, the cartoonish image the right has about such things are handled.

In line with fairness, we need a pic of Obama when the Benghazi attack took place.

Where he was and what he was doing will clearly show if he was doing his job as POTUS.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

The the question of what Obama was doing that night, and the subsequent whitewash blame America for the attack only further indicates how out of control the Federal Government had been and currently is still running wild with next to no accountability.
Very odd anyone in his right mind would subscribe to such abuse of power.

I thought you asked where he was? Now you seem to be swatting everywhere Earl. Still hoping something will stick?
Why don't you give us a list of possible locations that prove abuse of power to you.

Originally Posted by Humbert

I thought you asked where he was? Now you seem to be swatting everywhere Earl. Still hoping something will stick?
Why don't you give us a list of possible locations that prove abuse of power to you.

Obtuseness doesn't travel here. Where he was and what he was doing that night are relevant whether or not he was doing his job.

The subsequent Ambassador Rice blame America whitewash narrative on the Sunday talk shows was an outrage to anyone with a brain. Since Obama himself perpetuated this narrative in front of the UN, we must assume he's behind it. He is the the commander in chief after all is said and done. He should take responsibility for the misleading of the public.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Originally Posted by Humbert

I thought you asked where he was? Now you seem to be swatting everywhere Earl. Still hoping something will stick?
Why don't you give us a list of possible locations that prove abuse of power to you.

Obtuseness doesn't travel here. Where he was and what he was doing that night are relevant whether or not he was doing his job.

The subsequent Ambassador Rice blame America whitewash narrative on the Sunday talk shows was an outrage to anyone with a brain. Since Obama himself perpetuated this narrative in front of the UN, we must assume he's behind it. He is the the commander in chief after all is said and done. He should take responsibility for the misleading of the public.

You're missing the point here Earl. Campaigning in Vegas is a much higher priority with Barry than supporting his Ambassador. That is what this boils down to besides the ongoing coverup(s).

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Obtuseness doesn't travel here

Absolutely, so I must insist that you refrain from it in all your future posts. And please add stupidity and obfuscation to the list.

Well, awfully sorry to launch an ad-hominen attack on a certain group of people with a certain political outlook, but the same bunch of people that believe everything about Benghazi is a concerted cover up, are the same bunch of people telling you/us to believe this, just a few short years ago-

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

"We do know, with absolute certainty, that [Saddam Hussein] is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon."

"Mohamed Atta, who was the lead hijacker, did apparently travel to Prague on a number of occasions. And on at least one occasion, we have reporting that places him in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official a few months before the attack on the World Trade Center."

Case Dismissed. Prosecution lacks credible witlesses.

Originally Posted by sabang

Well, awfully sorry to launch an ad-hominen attack on a certain group of people with a certain political outlook, but the same bunch of people that believe everything about Benghazi is a concerted cover up, are the same bunch of people telling you/us to believe this, just a few short years ago-

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

"We do know, with absolute certainty, that [Saddam Hussein] is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon."

"Mohamed Atta, who was the lead hijacker, did apparently travel to Prague on a number of occasions. And on at least one occasion, we have reporting that places him in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official a few months before the attack on the World Trade Center."

Case Dismissed. Prosecution lacks credible witlesses.

Rightwingers are certainly the dumbest people on the planet.

Seems the Republicans have been caught out misrepresenting what those White House e-mails actually stated regarding the State Department "cover up". Oops.

WH Benghazi emails have different quotes than earlier reported - CBS News

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Obtuseness doesn't travel here

Absolutely, so I must insist that you refrain from it in all your future posts. And please add stupidity and obfuscation to the list.

Indeed it's plain stupid, especially after recent testimony from Gregory Hicks and others who were on the ground that night, not to see the attack in Benghazi as a terrorist attack as the original CIA report said. It's even more idiotic to refuse to see the subsequent coverup involving Ambassador Rice as the mouthpiece for the blame America narrative. Lies from the State dept and the White House make it impossible to not see.

It simply boggles the mind how any sensible person can subscribe to these outrages.
Especially when you factor in the ongoing IRS/AP/DOJ scandals.

It looks like the 'benghazi emails' are another right wing blogosphere hoax, this being very much the stock in trade of Breitbart & Daily Caller in particular.
It doesn't matter to them you see- it's only about stoking bubba's sense of helplessness and racial entitlement, and directing his frustration to all the wrong places.
The fact that it leaves them looking like fools, and lands the middle ground straight into the waiting arms of the Democrats, does not appear to factor in their equation.
So the GOP is pretty much assured of the monkey vote- now all they have to do is change the average American into a simian.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

During a serious national crises like a terrorist attack on US sovereign territory, ( a US consulate)

Consulates are not normally sovereign territory unless they are sharing a building with an embassy.

^^If they had any sense at all, they would take a look at how they have been mislead and move on to something of importance.

Already been whipped into a frenzy and can't disengage.

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

During a serious national crises like a terrorist attack on US sovereign territory, ( a US consulate)

Consulates are not normally sovereign territory unless they are sharing a building with an embassy.

U.S. embassies and consulates abroad, as well as foreign embassies and consulates in the United States, have a special status. While diplomatic spaces remain the territory of the host state, an embassy or consulate represents a sovereign state.

What is a U.S. Embassy?

It's unlikely Thai Military could march into the US consulate in Chiang Mai without a serious shit-storm taking place.

Originally Posted by misskit

^^If they had any sense at all, they would take a look at how they have been mislead and move on to something of importance.

Like APGate perhaps?